And no nerf on PGZ09 lol
it should be 8.7
1 Like
Please do not raise the BR of the G8N. Its payload is way too small, so why are we taking it to 6.3?
Do you guys ever actually lower the BR of Japanese aircraft? I’m sick and tired of this pattern; you guys never actually look at the performance of the planes you are uptiering (Zeros, J6K, Ki-84…). And don’t mention some plane like the Ki-109; it’s thankfully niche enough that it went down a few times. But forbid it gets popular, lest Gaijin increase it.
6 Likes
Vehicle: T-62/T-62 No.545
mode:ground simulation
8.7→8.3
8.7 BR tanks have more external armor, and the T-62 does not move fast
5 Likes
I agree with you too.F4EJ ADTW has really bad rader .She should be put into 10.7 RB.
4 Likes
J6K1 6.7 (RB) → 6.0/5.7
The fact that the J6K1 is at 6.7 is a travesty. This is my most played plane, and it pains me to play it at all after what you guys did to it. I am constantly fighting jets which out-accelerate and out-speed me. I am fighting superprops that do both and also outclimb me. The J6K1 is an extremely average plane with poor protection at 6.7 that only manages to decently turn fight. It compresses extremely easily, so you can hardly dive above 400 mph in it. It has a meh climb rate. It has poor rudder authority, average roll rate, poor survivability, and poor dive speed. Lets’s not forget this plane used to play better at release, but then you guys nerfed its flight model. Since then (2019), the J6K1 has only GONE UP in BR despite the performance nerf. This plane might have powerful armament, but that’s it. And not to mention, it’s not the only plane with multiple autocannons (duh). The J6K1 is outclassed by virtually every single plane at its BR, but it keeps going up because only collectors and veteran players use it. Inexperienced players who manage to buy it on the market are discouraged from playing it. I wonder why?? Please for the love of all that is good, move the J6K1 to 5.7/6.0
15 Likes
From my pov the plane scores simply way too much fighter kills for gaijin’s taste. It is not uncommon to see them with 2-3 fighter kills in a match.
Especially if they face (almost) pure German teams in the 6.0 - 7.0 bracket a lot of them go actively fighter & bomber hunting. And i saw some of them more or less farming Me 262s & Hornets…but at 7.0 matches against US teams they got rather easy clapped by A2D-1s…
1 Like
I suppose the question is more like. How does the JH-7A compare with aircraft like the Tornado IDS or F-111F (at 11.7) or Mirage F1C-200 (at 12.0) or Mirage 2KD or Tornado Gr4 (at 12.3) rather than looking at fighter aircraft like the F-4S or Mig-23MLD
Or am I mistaken that the JH-7A is a ground attacker
I’m tired boss. Gaijin only ever looks at numbers. If I ask the devs, they probably don’t even know how many bombs it carries
4 Likes
Equally worse.
I’d personally be fine with it. These vehicles would do just fine at 8.0, the guns they mount were practically designed to fight this sort of armor. If they struggle a bit more, it’d be only fair. WW2 era heavies shouldn’t have to face these things.
ARB, FFA P-16. 9.0 > 8.7. Direct Comparison to similar 8.7/9.0 vehicles, not good at anything - average-to-below average - other than payload, no countermeasures.
1 Like
Air RB. F-14A IRIAF. 13.0 > 12.7
The F-14A IRIAF will be outclassed/out equipped by nearly every opponent it faces at 13.0.
4 Likes
Imho you gave the explanation for the high BR - veteran players.
The MM at its current BR places it often either vs US or German dominated teams and they score rather easily kills vs Me 262, F-80 & Co - at least up to 7.0. So if you have them in your team it is worth to protect them as they play similar to F 24 Spitfires more than often the decisive factor in the very few close matches.
From my pov gaijin is trapped in their way of thinking that increasing BRs of aircraft would reduce their efficiency.
Whilst this works in general - it does not work for good turning aircraft - as long as there is no real SBMM in place players tend to turnfight when under pressure, no matter what they fly.
With increasing the BRs gaijin simply increases their turning advantage - so in order to kill the efficiency they need to decrease the BRs to have more well turning enemies to fight them. Another example: Re 2005.
GRB. XM800T. 8.0 > 8.3.
Overpowered at 8.0.
1 Like
Why not? If the planes with no RWR launch warnings can dodge fakours like you said, you can also simply dodge R-27ER, AAMRAM, MICA in F-14. Those missiles also have giant smoke trails
2 Likes
ARB. F-20A. 12.7 > 12.3.
ABSOLUTELY outclassed by everything at it’s current BR, this vehicle is desperately needing a BR adjustment.
4 Likes
“WDYM Advanced ARH manoeuvre way better than Fakour does!” gangs are incoming to reply to your comment.
in five… four…
2 Likes
Well do I have a surprise for you…
Air RB/GRB. Mig-23BN (Germany). 9.7 > 9.3
While this recommendation is the one I am most on the fence about, it has no countermeasures and no offensive air capability what-so-ever / with moving the Mig-21’s to 10.3 - I believe the situation warrants further evaluation of this vehicle.
1 Like
NVM… Stockholm corrected me.