That’s what I wanted to end up reaching, but on top of that in 9.3!! It would be an unfair abomination in its br
1 Like
Tiger II, if this engine modification is correct and “historical,” I want to show this:
“an improved version, the BR-471B (Russian: БР-471Б), was developed in the spring of 1945, but only became available in large numbers after the end of World War II.” Therefore, I want the BR-471D removed from the IS2 and some tank destroyers. This is also a “report.”
Tiger II engine: " With the HL230 , engine bore was increased from 125 to 130 mm (4.9 to 5.1 in). It had a displacement of 23.1 L (23,095 cc; 1,409.3 cu in), or 1,925 cc (117.5 cu in) per cylinder from a bore of 130 mm (5.1 in) and stroke of 145 mm (5.7 in). The maximum power output was 700 PS (690 hp; 510 kW) at 3,000 rpm. Maximum torque is 1,850 N⋅m (1,360 ft⋅lb) at 2,100 rpm. Typical output was 600 PS (590 hp; 440 kW) at 2,500 rpm."
Because at 34km/h tiger II its a bad joke and some players already correct you. Thanks.
4 Likes
Gaijin “Yeah naval decompression was stupid idea. Lets just put it all back in”
1 Like
M36B2 (FR) Ground RB: 5.7 => 5.3
Inadequate at its battle-rating
1 Like
Vehicle: SPz-12-3 LGS
BR Change: Keep 6.7
Compared to m50, it is slower and has less firepower. Its speed is also far inferior to that of the fiat 6614.
In the next update, the German Tiger II will be even slower, allowing American light tanks to more freely capture points and maneuver. What’s the justification for increasing the SPz’s battle rating?
7 Likes
Something something R2Y2 perhaps?
13 Likes
Merkava Mk.2D AB and RB 10.3 => 9.7
I will never ever buy any tank in the game.
I have bought Mekava 2D when it was 9.7. and now will be completely unplayable.
5 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Shenyang F-5
BR Change: 9.3 > 9.0
Reasoning: The Shenyang faces all aspect/high G IR missiles frequently (R60, 9G, 9J, 9L). Not to mention, the Lim/PF 17s are .7 lower with similar plane performance!!!
Due to it having missiles, 9.0 would but much more fair.
4 Likes
Suggestion,
RB NF
Restigouche class destroyer 4.0 - 4.3
When played currently the HMCS Terra Nova DDE-259 is a beast, it’s after the HE changes quite devastating with the forward 3"/70 QF Mk. N1 cannons, with the vessel only held back by the WWII vintage 3"/50 Mk.22 cannons on the stern (definitely should’ve been a gulf war refit with a 20 mm, than it would be a 4.7 easily).
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Mig-17AS
BR Change: 9.0 > 8.7
Reasoning: The 17AS lacks performance that of 9.0 aircraft. The LIM/PF 17s are substantially better in performance. While the AS does have missiles, i believe this advantage no longer warrants a .3 increase.
2 Likes
Super Etendard: Make Magic 1 available stock and remove modification
3 Likes
Ok, can I get my Refund on the Obj. 140 please? Bought excluseviley for my 8.3 line up which has been wrecked now.
3 Likes
Namer 30 11.3 > 10.7. As it stands currently, this vehicle does not perform well at its current br. If anything, it should go back down to its original BR and not up even more.
4 Likes
these are my stats in the Kfir C.1
these are my stats on the Mig-21 airframe (just showing these so you can see what experience I’m coming from)
imo the missiles on J-7D are the defining factor, flight performance-wise it’s not that special given the ok-ish engine and how quickly it bleeds energy. Kfir C.1, while it does have 2 fewer missiles will less capabilities has the engine power to stomp a Mig-21. I’ll have to do a few test to see how they perform at lower speeds (below 250mph)
Also sabra namer and now m51
Guess whats common to them?
1 Like
EBR 1951: Compared to the M24 Chaffee, it should not be sitting at 5.3 Move it down to 4.3.
10 Likes
If only the Namer Tsrikhon’s APS actually worked. It was added with a non-fuctional APS system which Gaijin… Trophy has not been working for nearly 1.4 years now. Its soon going to be two years before you fix trophy!
Suggestion,
RB NF
Ciclone class Torpedo Boat Ghibli 3.7 to 3.3/ or 3.0.
The vessel is still wilfully to high in BR, this ship should at least going down to 3.3 alongside better starter destroyer or go further an be placed at 3.0 akin to the SKR Groza the Project 2 which also started life as a torpedo boat.
It’s original BR was already terrible (also cost me chatting after a joke) & the reduction was an olive branch but it should still needs be lowered even more.
1 Like
Incredibly funny that the Merkava Mk.2D is moving up yet again
What was already a terrible vehicle is being shafted yet again for no discernible reason.
Being higher than the regular Merkavas for not much gain it was already quite weak at 10.0 and not meta, now it’s going to be one BR step lower than the Leopard 2A4? This is ridiculous.
It’s basically a huge middle finger to those that bought it.
3 Likes
If you can’t dodge an Aim-9B you are either not paying attention, or you’re playing a Tu-4.
What makes the Su-7s worse than the buccaneer at 9.3, or the Q-5 early? Why should they be the same BR as the J29F, A32A, or th Hunter F.1?
The Yak-38 also has the flight characteristics of a sausage, and you can blame BR compression for the rest.