You sure about that? I have both vehicles and honestly the Kfir C.1 feels better overall with flight performance, especially with low altitude top speed.
Then whats the Gripen C for?
shilka with proxy 20g missiles is the strela all over again. now with guns!!!
3 Likes
It’s a clear upgrade over the A, Morvran.
How so?
What does the Gripen C get the Gripen A doesnt if the Gripen A got AMRAAM?
What are the differences?
There are worse 9.3 planes, and no supersonic plane should be below 9.3.
3 Likes
Why do you change the reload times of many tanks, including an unrealistic KV2 reload change, it should be even slower not this silly fast reload…
Sorry but 12 years I have been providing polity, well thought out and reasonable feedback just to be ignored while you cater to crybabies…so if you can not beat them, join them.
So what is your reason to do such an unrealistic change to the reload without any BR change to the KV 2 please ?
2 Likes
J-7D walks all over the Kfir Gderot in everything barring top speed at low alt, which it can counter by just firing a PL-5B at you that cannot be outrun. And the PL-5B is so fast if you don’t throttle down significantly and flare just after launch, it WILL hit you due to the “harrier disease” the Kfir suffers from.
2 Likes
What? Historically accurate would be AIM-9L for all LW Phantoms.
Also, the excel tab just seems to include air unit’s BR changes.
MiG-21MF (all), MiG-21SMT
10.3>10.7
Reasoning:
These should never have been moved to 10.3. 9.3s don’t deserve this and how are 9.3s-10.3s ever going to be moved up when people can point to the MiG-21s as “nuh uh”!
1 Like
su-7 flies like a bus??? what is bro talking about.
oh well, guess I’ll have to find something else to spend those spare chickens on
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Su-7B
BR Change: 9.3 → 9.0.
Reasoning: Compared to other planes with similar role, this one has NO smart weapons at all! It has only dumb bombs and S-24. The israely A-4E and Ayit at similar or lower BR have the AGM-62A TV guided missiles.
The fact that it also has only backwards facing RWR is not helping when it has to dive towards the enemy, since it cannot detect if its being locked up by radar SPAAs.
Plus it has the same issues as in Air RB - flies like a bus, no AAMs and flares.
idk in my experience Mig-21s aren’t really that scary, you’re right about having to throttle down significantly but thats mainly because of the direction the flares pop out at. You can out energy Mig-21s if you know what you’re doing
AIM-9L was introduced in the Peace Rhine upgrade, which also added countermeasures along with other changes. The “normal” F-4F is the post-Peace Rhine while the “early” is the pre-Peace Rhine. So yeah, all F-4Fs used AIM-9L eventually but only after an upgrade programme which is specifically modelled as a separate vehicle (a good decision)
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Su-7BKL
BR Change: 9.3 → 9.0.
Reasoning: Same situation as the Su-7B. While it has 2 more bomb and rocket pylons, those are for the same type of weaponry as the previous model. Compared to other planes with similar role, this one has NO smart weapons at all! It has only dumb bombs and S-24. The israely A-4E and Ayit at similar or lower BR have the AGM-62A TV guided missiles.
The fact that it also has only backwards facing RWR is not helping when it has to dive towards the enemy, since it cannot detect if its being locked up by radar SPAAs.
Plus it has the same issues as in Air RB - flies like a bus, no AAMs and flares.
1 Like
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: Su-7BKM
BR Change: 9.3 → 9.0.
Reasoning: Same situation as the Su-7B. While it has 2 more bomb and rocket pylons, those are for the same type of weaponry as the previous model. Compared to other planes with similar role, this one has NO smart weapons at all! It has only dumb bombs and S-24. The israely A-4E and Ayit at similar or lower BR have the AGM-62A TV guided missiles.
The fact that it also has only backwards facing RWR is not helping when it has to dive towards the enemy, since it cannot detect if its being locked up by radar SPAAs.
Plus it has the same issues as in Air RB - flies like a bus, no AAMs and flares.
1 Like
Welp it was expected to see it go up in BR finally the Destroyer JDS Ayanami DD-103, I will not oppose it but.
With the change, please finally give it a destroyer damage model.
Currently as rated a frigate it’s quite prone to damage, as rated a frigate all secondary & tertiary batteries of enemy ships can target & fire upon it, with being rated a destroyer this would stop.
As hey what’s the point in having it rated a destroyer when called out in battle with the multi menu, having the pennant numbers visible (DD-103) yet at the same time rated a frigate in regards to the tect tree & in battle gets melted by Light AA fire from bots, (player bots), late WWII player ships while surcumbing to extremely high repair costs & ammunition costs mmm - 40 000 sl battles on a daily basis.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic
Vehicle: T-64B
Current BR: 9.7 → Proposed BR: 10.0
Reasoning:
Strongest frontal armor at its BR, comparable to T-80B. Stops most 105 mm and early 120 mm APFSDS (DM23, DM33) except weak spots.
Decent mobility (17 hp/t) and average reload (7.1s), comparable to other 9.7–10.0 MBTs.
Fires 3BM42 Mango (457 mm pen), able to frontally destroy 10.0+ MBTs like Leopard 2A4 and M1 Abrams, while the opposite is not the case
Overall performance is closer to 10.0 MBTs such as Leopard 2AV or Shir 1, with composite armor, stabilizer, and 400+ mm APFSDS, but no thermals.
2 Likes
Naval RB: L90509: 2.7 => 2.3
Inadequate at its battle-rating