can recomment to give it a try
the F-16A has better 1 circle performance than the F-2, but the F-2 has better 2 circle performance and more engine power which makes it better in a vertical fight
1 Like
Type 90 doesn’t need to go up. Stop punishing good players for correctly using a tanks strengths to it’s advantage. Taking away the fun one by one.
4 Likes
Strongly disagree with all the Reload Time reductions. Especially big ones like KV-2 and Pvkv II.
Long reloads and slow target acquisition is what makes low ranks unique and puts a great emphasis on positioning and the limited mobility.
Please don’t trun the game into an Arcade.
stomping 10.3 isnt exactly being a good player.
1 Like
Then maybe just MAYBE decompress GRB!!!??
it did, it r*ped 10.3 vehicles
1 Like
oh, on that I actually agree.
that is exactly what they are doing
they are decompressing 10.0/ 10.3
in one of the next changes they will probably decompress 10.7/11.0
Decompressing by just shoving more stuff up to 12.0
We need decompression by actually increasing the maximum BR
air has been at 14.0 for awhile now why hasnt ground gone up to match it?
1 Like
with the planned reload reductions for the KV-2 series tanks and the T30, is there any plan for the Lorraine 155 mle.50 to get a reduction in reload? The M44 tanks have a lower br and lower reloads than the Lorraine 155
1 Like
No they are not. They are singling out a specific country and playerbase (Which happens to be better than the average USA USSR or Germany main) and punishing them. The Type 90 on paper is a mediocre tank that only has a good reload and mobility. It will now be the same BR as the click bait which is a total joke.
1 Like
I’ve been able to outturn almost everyone around that rating but an f5 while keeping my speed very well. I don’t get what people mean by saying mig 23 turns poor.
1 Like
and 481mm pen shell.
and regularly facing as low as 10.3.
anyone can be good under such conditions.
Mode : Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle : T-64B
Change : 9.7 → 10.0
Reasoning : The T-64B has the same shells as the T-72AV and T-80UD, and its firepower is extremely superior. Its armor and maneuverability are comparable to those of the 10.0.
Therefore, the T-64B should be BR 10.0.
2 Likes
That just means you never played it before the FM nerf. It is really bad compared to what it was.
amx32 shouldn’t go to 9.3br
This is a vehicle that was mediocre or even lower-tier in 9.3. It has lower-tier mobility, average APFSDS, and lower-tier protection, but it has increased its weight, which is very unreasonable.
6 Likes
Was it fair?
LMAO you say 481mm like that is good for the BR. The M1A1 has a 600mm shell at the same BR. China has a 580mm shell at 11.0. Merkava gets a 600mm shell at 11.3. Give me a break!
2 Likes
None of this correlates with reality besides the 64B having the same ammo. The T-64B is already mediocre at 9.7.
1 Like
type 90 has better reload and mobility, your argument?