if u’re so smart, search for T34’s and IS-2’s instructions manuals and tell me if they’re realistic/historical ingame.
if King Tiger will get nerfed, i wanna know its for a good reason
multipath is mostly a coping mechanism for bad players at top tier, IRL it should not be a thing for modern missiles
Hell I think the later AIM-7s had features that made them impossible to multipath them unless you were <10m from the ground
i mean this is from a museum with a tiger 2
- Engine: Maybach HL 230 P30, 12-cylinder V-twin, petrol, 700 hp
1 Like
Is that all you got?
The 268 has a very flat part that’s kinda hard to miss - with the 122-54 you play the lottery, not every shot to the cupola will kill anyone. I’d wager that surviving 70% of frontal encounters is better than dying.
Also, you mean to tell me that 17.1s, worse mobility is more deserving of 7.0 than a 122mm that reloads every 12.3 seconds, has APDS, HEATFS and APCBC?
How many aim120 will the F16A be able to carry? 2?
i think its valid, Begleitpanzer 57 has one of the best autocannons ingame, with the fastest reload and it also has strong ATGMs, thermals, laser rangefinder and stabilizer at 9.3, so i think its valid.
also there aren’t too much 10.7 tanks with ERA that can counter-rest the ATGMs, and that 137mm slap as hell
looked a bit through the manual and found this:
it seems like 38kph is the highest speed it can reach before the engine or gearbox is destroyed
the table lists the top speed for each gear at 2500rpm
and in the 8th gear it is 34kph
2 Likes
It’s unfair for the IS-2 not to have a 2.5-to-1 numerical advantage over Tiger I and II tanks. It’s also unfair that it doesn’t get battles at longer ranges, where its 122 mm gun actually shined in reality, because Gaijin doesn’t run actual WWII-style tank battles. It’s unfair for the IS-2 that Tigers in-game don’t have gearbox issues, and that their drivers are not required to have maximum driving skill level. But, you know… that’s just not how the game works, is it?
People forget how different WWII tank armor and combat were compared to reality. For example, the long-barreled Panzer IV would realistically be about 5.7 BR since it was made in 1942. You have to take the nerf and remember how bent reality is for tech trees to function. If we were truly realistic, the IS-7 would be fighting 6.7 BR tanks. And even if we went full “what-if” nonsense, the USSR would have far more tanks.
1 Like
and i have the tiger 2 manual saying it has 600hp
Please consider lowering the T29 from 7.0 to 6.7 as well as dropping the reload nerf.
This vehicle is nearly equal (but generally worse) than a Tiger II H. It should never have been moved to 7.0 and especially if its going to receive a reload nerf, it should be lowered back to where it belongs.
4 Likes
probably, or maybe it could be able to carry 6 just like the israelian F-16D or the american C
it can’t shoot the ATGM on the move, cannot pen anything frontally unless it’s an abrams or light tank and has gen 1 thermals, BMP-3 and BMD-4 have gen 3 thermals, ATGMs with a tandem warhead and better pen which they can shoot on the move and the BMD-4M is more mobile with IRST
Why F-16 ADF up to 13.3? Just give an F-16C Block 30/32 and keep the ADF in 12.7
1 Like
it should be 4 from what i heard
makes sense, it is a drivers manual after all. But still, regarding the top speed it could still be reasonable to make 38km/h the top speed for the tiger 2 ingame instead of 34.
ADF is getting AIM-120s, did you not see the Community Update?
How is possible that VBC (PT2) and VBCI-2 (MCT30) share the same BR?
The latter has:
- gen 3 thermals (both gunner and commander)
- better hp/t ratio
- better gun
- unmmaned turret
- IRST
- superduper fuel tank in the front
2 Likes
Did you guys hire an ex-WoT tank balancer or something sheesh.
2 Likes
Type 90 was enjoying some favorable matchmaking against 10.3 and 10.7 with even the premium variant, one that is much more accesible to new and therefore unexperienced players, having 1.4 K/D.
Its not going to solve issues of Type 90 stomping 10.7 but it will certainly give 10.3 some breathing room.
2 Likes
yep, I read it, and that’s why I said why not give another F-16 instead of modify the ADF loadout