the Tiger engine will probably still overperform unless gaijin limited it to 2500rpm
point 1.: the Max-RPM is limited to 2500 RPM
1 Like
i never said it doesn’t benefit me, i say that is unfair cuz if it gets that nerf (and sadly it will get it), then the stock hp of the tiger will be 519hp, and max will be 600hp.
tell u, ron_23, master of masters that has a goddamn Tiger II’s instructions manual, how bad could be/is the mobility of a tiger II (H) when it has 619hp? and how bad could it be if it had that “historical” 519hp/600hp?
Air Realistic Battles
J-10A
Battle Rating increase 13.7 → 14.0
With this planes insane flight performance, IRCCM missiles, and PL-12s, there is no excuse for this plane to be fighting 12.7s. No 12.7 plane has fox 3 missiles, and the vast majority don’t even have IRCCM missiles, there is no competition for the J-10A against these planes, and is therefore unbalanced. I can’t think of a reason why this plane would suffer at 14.0 given the current proposed BR changes.
tiger 2 is being nerfed for historical accuracy
BMP-3 and BMD-4 are being moved
I also find it a shame that the begleit is being moved up as well
it is possible that the reports had data from some testing institute, which i would value a bit higher than the manual for the tank driver
that is the reason why i want to look at the reports
It’s nice to see a it’s nice to see a lot of this plane going up in br. It’s nice to s it’s nice to see that you guys are decompressing the br. Let me start by saying someone who played this game for a long time on air rb who has played this game for a very long time. this isn’t gonna be enough to compress the br. What we need is at least 15 br to really decompress the BR. Is there a lot of plane still suffering at 12 br and even 13 br because they dont have aim 120 and multi-path is way too low to to even evade any missile that’s why I think 15 oh it’ll be the correct BR for 120 for a lot of a 120. Plus in air RB cloud and the timer needs to go.
Now, I see a lot of changes for high (br) vehicles, but not changes to props, which is really really disappointed to see the Spitfire mark 24 on the J6k1 going down on br. They have no business fighting jets or even 7.7 jets. Even at 67 they get to see jet matches all the time which is not right I don’t want no no fighting jets which will be a really nice change for the game and people who we still enjoy prop gameplay maybe if they put them at 6.3 that’ll be way more enjoyable together with a P 51H this is one reason that I think that needs to be extent even to 15.0 br so that way, early War (Korean )planes can go up on (br) what’s nextJ6k1 fighting make fitting mig 15 or even saber? the props needs some love, but even your being general needs to be decompress, especially props. Air rb the timer needs to be extend or taking out because if you have to carry the timer of the ticket will literally make you lose the match and also if it’s only one person camping the airfields, it needs to be a timer to keep them out of the airfield and it will no longer protect them. This is the changes that I would like to see in this update. Please listen to your community a lot of changes because the way is going is not good. Well, I think a lot of Japanese planes. They were poor because they’re guns and they’re gone down longer at work like before, it takes too many rounds to kill one target is not enjoyable at all so please please give mid tier some love and actually this time to really decompress the br once for all. Like I say, I don’t think any plane should be a tear for their guns.
if u’re so smart, search for T34’s and IS-2’s instructions manuals and tell me if they’re realistic/historical ingame.
if King Tiger will get nerfed, i wanna know its for a good reason
multipath is mostly a coping mechanism for bad players at top tier, IRL it should not be a thing for modern missiles
Hell I think the later AIM-7s had features that made them impossible to multipath them unless you were <10m from the ground
i mean this is from a museum with a tiger 2
- Engine: Maybach HL 230 P30, 12-cylinder V-twin, petrol, 700 hp
1 Like
Is that all you got?
The 268 has a very flat part that’s kinda hard to miss - with the 122-54 you play the lottery, not every shot to the cupola will kill anyone. I’d wager that surviving 70% of frontal encounters is better than dying.
Also, you mean to tell me that 17.1s, worse mobility is more deserving of 7.0 than a 122mm that reloads every 12.3 seconds, has APDS, HEATFS and APCBC?
How many aim120 will the F16A be able to carry? 2?
i think its valid, Begleitpanzer 57 has one of the best autocannons ingame, with the fastest reload and it also has strong ATGMs, thermals, laser rangefinder and stabilizer at 9.3, so i think its valid.
also there aren’t too much 10.7 tanks with ERA that can counter-rest the ATGMs, and that 137mm slap as hell
looked a bit through the manual and found this:
it seems like 38kph is the highest speed it can reach before the engine or gearbox is destroyed
the table lists the top speed for each gear at 2500rpm
and in the 8th gear it is 34kph
2 Likes
It’s unfair for the IS-2 not to have a 2.5-to-1 numerical advantage over Tiger I and II tanks. It’s also unfair that it doesn’t get battles at longer ranges, where its 122 mm gun actually shined in reality, because Gaijin doesn’t run actual WWII-style tank battles. It’s unfair for the IS-2 that Tigers in-game don’t have gearbox issues, and that their drivers are not required to have maximum driving skill level. But, you know… that’s just not how the game works, is it?
People forget how different WWII tank armor and combat were compared to reality. For example, the long-barreled Panzer IV would realistically be about 5.7 BR since it was made in 1942. You have to take the nerf and remember how bent reality is for tech trees to function. If we were truly realistic, the IS-7 would be fighting 6.7 BR tanks. And even if we went full “what-if” nonsense, the USSR would have far more tanks.
1 Like
and i have the tiger 2 manual saying it has 600hp
Please consider lowering the T29 from 7.0 to 6.7 as well as dropping the reload nerf.
This vehicle is nearly equal (but generally worse) than a Tiger II H. It should never have been moved to 7.0 and especially if its going to receive a reload nerf, it should be lowered back to where it belongs.
4 Likes
probably, or maybe it could be able to carry 6 just like the israelian F-16D or the american C
it can’t shoot the ATGM on the move, cannot pen anything frontally unless it’s an abrams or light tank and has gen 1 thermals, BMP-3 and BMD-4 have gen 3 thermals, ATGMs with a tandem warhead and better pen which they can shoot on the move and the BMD-4M is more mobile with IRST
Why F-16 ADF up to 13.3? Just give an F-16C Block 30/32 and keep the ADF in 12.7
1 Like
it should be 4 from what i heard