mig-17AS,
9.0 → 8.7
air rb
its basicaly the same as the TT mig17 but with worse 9Bs,
2 Likes
- i didn’t throw a super anonyme source
- i wasn’t expecting ppl to believe me
- i searched for 15min in that website and i didn’t find anything relationated with tanks, even when i searched it in my own languague
F-4F early
10.7 (ARB) → 10.3 (ARB)
Just like F-4F this plane is borderline unplayable while vehicles of similar ability, characteristics and playstyle are usually placed at 10.0 or 10.3 such as F-1 for example.
1 Like
that might be the reason why you cant look at those reports rn
here the link that was provided in the BR changes table:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PROVKMs8LRSw
was it deleted or something?
im doing well in the f4f late, BUT in no means its a powerful aircraft
The reduction in the T30’s reload time must be accompanied by an increase in BR; it cannot remain at 6.7 with the armor it has and a reduced reload time. It was already a problem at that BR before, and now the situation is even more unbalanced.
its unfair, most heavy tanks have over +650hp but casually Gaijin wants to nerf the hp of the Tiger making it go below 600hp
is that the 2nd report for the tiger? im not able to look at that report since the br changes came out from the split second when it loaded tho it was about the tiger E for some reason even tho its abt the tiger II? any explanation?
idk you cant acces the tiger 2 reports tho for some reason, if i could i would have posted its sorces instead of a manual that might be unrealted to the reports
so is it not unfair for every single one of those tanks to have their historical engine performance but the tiger has better than it had historically?
What i don’t get about the Sla.16 report is the source. It’s just a picture of something. It doesn’t even say that it’s the Sla.16 engine in the graph. It could be any engine. Where does that picture come from? Maybe me the mods can see more than we.
if you want to actually research for anything in tanks and not do it via hand tell chatgpt with deep research mode to search about X topic in multiple languagues, And base it’s answer with 60+ sources if the subject has that many
talking about historical things in a virtual game is dumb as hell.
this game is everything but realistic
P-59A is faster than most of the PROPS it sees along with turning like a zero… And your telling me you want it lower?
just because it doesnt benfit you rn you are complaining about it
“realism is when i win, the more i win the more realistic it is”
2 Likes
i searched by my own hand, im not stupid and i know that ChatGPT doesn’t know nothing.
one time i was curious and i asked it to tell me what was better, Kurnass or MiG-23MLD and it said Kurnass had mach 5 missiles with 25G while Flogger had mach 5.6 with 20G and idk what more unlogical things more
What are the reasons for the Tiger II nerf?
Also, why increase the BR of the Begleitpanzer and not that of the BMP 3 or BMD4 vehicles, which have better performance than the Begleitpanzer?
1 Like
Base mig 17 should be 9.0 anyway, the mig 15 bis and bis ish should be 8.7. These planes are fantastic dog fighters and should not be seeing 7.7s let alone 8.0 jets.
Although I understand why he is upset and his reasoning behind “historical accuracy”.
We cannot ignore historical documents just because we want a vehicle buffed or nerfed. That is a flawed logic and will just cause more issues than it solves