If the AGS must go up, give it M900, it’s higher than the IPM1 at this point and even it has M900. If the shell is indeed too much for 11.7 then 12.0 would be a fine BR for it too. It will be in 12.0 games almost all the time anyway. The tank should be equipped for it.
That’s a pretty moot argument.
It already received M900.
Moving type 90 to 11.7 is fair, but it doesn’t solve the problem, it just moves it somewhere else. The solution is to increase the max br to at least 12.3, which has been needed for a long time.
The XM800t does not deserve 8.7. First of all, there is practically no lineup at this BR, so it will probably be played at 9.0. Secondly, good luck with penetrating, for example, Russian tanks, even from the side.
obj 906 should have returned to its BR of 8.3 a long time ago. A light tank, with 4s reload, stabilization, and HEAT shells. Alternatively, weaken its firepower.
If the T29 is weakened, you should also increase the reload time of the Tiger II 105.
Type 59, ZTZ 59A, and Type 69 should be moved to 8.3, because they have stabilization, and that makes a big difference in balance, where they even encounter vehicles from 7.0, including heavy tanks, which have no arguments in combat against them, worse mobility, dpm, and firepower.
In connection with the strengthening of DM33 shells, which have benefited German vehicles the most, I believe that selected German vehicles from 9.3 br, which should have had their BR increased long ago, and now, after the strengthening of these shells, vehicles such as tam2IP, c2a1, leo1a5, leo a1a1 l/44, m48 super should have their BR increased to 9.7 along with the begleitpanzer.
With the change in the penetration value of DM33 shells, what is the point of having DM63 105mm shells? The differences are minor, mainly in the weight of the shell.
As previously mentioned, I believe that the PZH2000 should be upgraded to 8.0 and the Vidar to 8.3—laser rangefinder, rapid reloading, mobility, overpressure, and VIDAR additionally equipped with thermal imaging.
Anti-aircraft vehicles such as Gepard, Falcon, ITPSV Leopard - all anti-aircraft vehicles on these BRs, equipped with stabilization, DPM, APDS, should be weakened because they completely destroy the balance and are foolproof. Their BR should be increased or their APDS should be taken away.
I have an idea for changing the Bradley vehicles. I know that in reality they have ATGM launchers that close when moving, but it would be possible to leave them open all the time, even when moving, which would speed up combat readiness and firing, and would be more balanced and enjoyable.
With the change in the past of T55 family vehicles from 8.3 to 8.7, their reload time was also reduced for balance purposes, so I believe that a vehicle such as the T95E1, which also went up in BR at that time, did not get anything in return. It has a caliber of only 90mm and no stabilization, so it deserves this change.
Instead of increasing the BR, of MSC you could weaken it so that it remains at 10.7 and stays at that BR. You have introduced a lot of Leopard 2A4 vehicles, which, surprisingly, do not upset the balance, but just one vehicle from a less popular nation and you are already weakening it, especially when France did not have a lineup on this BR for years and when it was finally created, you are destroying it. Sometimes it is better to weaken something’s parameters, e.g. firepower, than to change the BR, because lineups are more important.
Please keep the MSC at 10.7. Yes, maybe it may have an autoloader and decent armour, but it still isn’t a very survivable tank and it wouldn’t stand a chance against 12.0.
nope, not yet, top round for AGS rn is M833
the only vehicles in the American TT with the M900 round are IPM1 and M1128 Stryker, TCM AGS has been stuck with M833 for a while now
Why are the Seahawks going up? They’re horrendously slow even at their current BR and can’t catch anyone if they decide to run away and now they will be facing supersonics lol
Not good BR changes Overall. I regret searching the french TT just because of the nerfs, this is becoming unbearable, nerfs upon nerfs yet nothing changes for the planes and tanks that are nerfed to the ground or forgotten about.
Just SAD
KV-2 reload going down by almost 10 seconds … ah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-haaaaaaa…
fact
Nah, rafale got isolated from murdering 13.0, mirage from 12.7. Overall great for the game health.
2S6 still stays at 10.7?
imo the slightly longer reload and limited traverse makes up for the extra mobility and traverse speed
(G6 has 28.6 deg/s for both Horizontal and vertical, while M109 has 11deg/s horizontal and 7 deg/s vertical, literally 2.6x and 4.1x faster)
In addition to the Better HE shell and gun depression
G6

M109

also better optics (8-12x vs 4x fixed)
and Smoke Grenades
and its breech is a lot harder to disable due to it being a lot smaller
but of course it does have its own limitations, but its well worth it imo, 6.7 fits for it and last time i played it it did perfectly well


July 2025,this is why Strf is better than 2S38.
yeah in the 1 out of every 100 battle you are top br.
Realistic air combat
Mirage F1C-200 (and variants)
Change Br12.0 to Br11.7
Explanation: This is one of the worst representatives of 12.0. Only 2 infrared missiles, while opponents have 2 to 4 + 2/4/6 radar missiles. They seem to have protection against interference, but everyone who has played with them knows that it only works in clear 6 and no further than 1.5 km and not against everyone. So they are not bad, but they are not competitive with Aim7E2/F/M, R23/R24/R27R/ER. Matra Super 530F is not a competitive missile, any dipole reflector and the missile is lost, thus the radar is also useless. Any 12.0 is better in terms of flight characteristics. The maximum speed is good, but its acceleration is the slowest compared to its competitors due to the engine’s thrust relative to its weight.
wrong. Magic2s work like magic (pun intended) They are basicaly 2 guaranteed kills per match
So true king. Lets move the F1s to 11.7.
Why Aubl/74 at 6.7