That is interesting, although I still believe that the AIM-9L does not need any changes currently
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: Hunter F.1
BR change: 9.0-8.7
Reasoning: The British Hunter F.1 is at 9.0 with no missiles, but the swedish hunter (J34), another version of the Hunter also at 9.0 has access to missiles, leaving the British F.1 Hunter at unreasonable disadvantage at the same BR.
7 Likes
The American M60A3 TTS needs M833 ngl cause the M774 wont be cutting it compared to the taiwanese one if it gets DM33
it’s 5.7
DECOMPRESS GROUND RB to 12.7
Much needed to give some breathing room to lower tier vehicles especially at 6.7 and 8.0/9.0 range where many vehicles suffer too much in uptiers or have it too good in downtiers (heavy tanks vs heat slingers/ unstabilized,rangefinderless tanks vs stabilized, laser range finder, apfsds tanks)
4 Likes
14.0 or 15.0 ideally. So many compressed BRs. 12.7 will do close to nothing.
2 Likes
you said that already
If you mentioned the BMP-2, it has the almighty 2A42, which grinds everything alive. And the BMP-3 has a Chinese fake in the form of the 2A72, where half of the shells are immediately thrown into the trash due to the lack of damage.
What needs to happen is a total overhaul of how IR Signatures are modeled. With both exhaust temps modeled and directional exhaust.
We have some pretty major issues like F-5s on full reheat are colder than an F-117 and a Harrier is so hot that it can barely flare R-60Ms when at lower air speeds when the R-60M is fired from near their max range.
Its a total mess. Once that is fixed, rebalancing can go from there. For the most part. People will just have to be more proactive in defending by dropping out of reheat when defending, so shouldnt impact BRs excessively, but would go a long way to improve that aspect of the games health
2 Likes
oh wait, yep
wasn’t sure if it was sent as I got logged out as soon as I posted
I agree with higher brs for tanks, however that should not change the br of the current top tier SAMs and SPAAs, they are still very easy to defeat with 12.0 and 12.3 aircraft
Would much rather see ground BR decompression… instead of uptiering a bunch of vehicles into the zero line-up having abyss of top tier ! mainly referring to the MSC, what exactly was the point of adding the vehicle…? i hopefully would prefer to see an introduction for 13.0 br for ground soon perhaps i… i don’t know.
anyhoo, thanks for saving my sweet precious vfm5 :3
Welp i guess instead of moving the Type 81 (C) down they moved the entire 11.3 up instead. So i guess it stay at 11.7, but can we please get the SAHR missile? max 5km range and no radar is pitiful at 11.7 since 8/10 match would be 12.0 anyway so might as well use the Tan Sam Kai which suck but at least it have SAHR missile.
Im glad, because im always surprised that just because you try to provide a counterargument, people will just instantly go to call you a slur and think you are the second worst thing since the austrian painter.
it also depends on the loader not being spread around the tanks interior and other crew members :P
which, fair point, but its not like autoloader is without its advantages either. the aforementioned quicker reload out of the box and not being dependent on loader being alive. but i digress.
Ill admit im not qualified enough to comment on that, so i will just take your word for it.
well poor crew layout isnt unique to MSC. The driver-gunner-commander conga line of 2A4 also doesnt exactly scream great post pen survivability. Then again its not like MSC doesnt have this exact same problem.
thats why i said i was fine with MSC being 10.7. Just with the fact that 2A4s armor wont stop most common tank rounds at this BR either, id take slightly better firepower over slightly better armor.
Its clear that theres some consensus about this between us, so Im fine with leaving this issue as it is.
Air Realistic Battles
Tu-4 (all)
8.0 → 6.7
At its current BR Tu-4 constantly meets planes, that are way faster and often armed with air-to-air missiles. Tu-4 can’t win matches or play effectively, because if enemy team ignores you, you’ll never get any kills. Also, there are many fast planes with bombs and airspawns on close BRs, that can reach bases much faster, so bombing on Tu-4 is also worthless.
2 Likes
Air Realistic Battles
B-29A-BN
7.0 → 6.3
The main problem of B-29 is it’s turrets. Brownings M2 don’t deal enough damage to efficiently kill enemies. Tu-4, even with all its problems, at least can destroy or severely damage any plane, that’s trying to attack him. And if B-29 with its Brownings is attacked by something like La-200 or Me-163, it will die with 90% probability, without any significant damage to enemy.
1 Like
They would never do such a big jump, even 12.7 is big by their standards but i think it is within reach, obviously the more the better.
Considering an increase in BR for tanks would definitely also mean an increase in BR for CAS, This would be a non-issue. The fact the IRIS-T SLM is the same BR as the CS/SA5, Elde-98 and ITO is a crime.
Air Realistic Battles
Kfir C.2
BR should change from 11.7 → 11.3
Although the plane has good flight performance, it lacks a radar, and is limited to only 2 python 3 missile which are very easy to flare. This severly limits its capabilities as its current br range heavily focused on the use of SARH missiles, and even IRCCM missiles in that case of the Mirages found around this BR. At 11.3 it will be able to make better use of its flight performance without being a detriment to the BR range as it has similar flight performance to the Kfir Canard found at 11.0, they even share the same engine.
1 Like