Yes, I know that, ntp, I understood it the first time, but at least they should upload it from br or make the fim-92k buff as they have reported with true files with 20g of rotation
yes
decompression is always welcome, but do it right zzzz
mirage2k5f having a bigger br than the f15(m) and Gripen C is crazy.
This plane is a 13.7 it shouldn’t climb from br.
F15E being 14.0 and f15C being 13.7 is another ready joke…
The f18 problem continues…
f18 A continues to destroy games in 12.3, the early f18C continues to be too strong for 12.7.
f18A should be 12.7 and f18C early should receive 9m to go up to 13.0.
f18C late Finnish without HMD should go down to 13.7.
But absolutely nothing has been done about it.
Problems with the f16…
Several f16s have a lot of inconsistencies in their br and I’ll give examples of how this doesn’t make sense:
Now the mlu, adf will receive aim120 and will go to 13.3 as well as the f16D barak II and this change is positive, now explain to me why the hell the f16AM and f16 OCU will continue on 13.7?
They are exactly like the MLU and ADF with Araam, why won’t they come down from BR?
…and why the f16A remains at 12.3 is the netz at 12.7?
1 Like
It was one thing when the BMP-3 had a fairly low BR and then yes, it would have been a threat, but now the BMP-3 has the reloading of tanks from the 1940s in battles against equipment from the 1980s
1 Like
They did though?
also the reports for the tiger IIs are for the tiger E? and the SLa 16 is just 2 pictures that makes no sense
Bkan deserves to be touched. It’s so annoying
2 Likes
what ? It has an autocannon bro thats what you are supposed to use. The atgm is the secondary which can take out tanks frontaly as a get out of jail free card.
F-15J(M) Changes
BR 13.7 > 14.0
I believe this change should ONLY happen if the F-15J(M) receives IRST and MAWS. The F-15E/I being the same BR as F-15J(M) despite being faster, better acceleration and IRST is criminal. Not to mention it has a plethora of A2G capability- which isn’t all that useful in ARB, but allows for F-15Es to destroy a lot of the AI ground troops.
GIving the F-15J(M) IRST would allow for it to be close to the F-15E in terms of capability- but having a better close range IR missiles, being lighter and better in close range.
Giving the F-15J(M) access to the J/APQ-1 MAWS would allow it to use its speed to escape other aircraft without having to worry about missiles from the rear, or not be snuck up on.
F-15J(M) w/ IRST Pod
1 Like
I do not like the changes that have been made towards the F-16A ADF, F-16AJ and the Italian F-16A ADF. I do not want the AMRAAMs (AIM-120 missiles) to be added and I do not want them to be at battle rating 13.3. ;D
Thank you very much :D
XM800T uptiered and moved after the M3 Bradley? Yikes, what even? This thing has a 20mm autocannon that only pens 66mm at most with its top belt and no ATGM, compared to the Bradley which does have ATGMs and a larger, much more penetrating autocannon. I don’t see why this should be after the Bradley, not unless it’s being reconsidered how similar autocannon only vehicles are balanced in general.
The BMP-3’s automatic cannon is approximately 2 times worse than that of the BMP-2.
1 Like
F-16AJ is not getting AMRAAMs, only the ADF (US + ITA) and Chinese F-16A MLU
Agree
Light tank in 11.7 just like CV90120 have near 600mm penetration and 5s reload.There is no reason to let ags get 522mm penetration.
HMaS Fremantle (3.0) → (2.7) [Realistic]
This ship at best is nothing but a sidegrade to the HMaS Arrow found at 2.7. It is essentially a bigger Arrow with 3 .50 cals (controlled by AI) instead of the 1 by the Arrow.
1 Like
Can somebody tell me why I should even bother crewing the MSC if its pushed up to 11.0? Like seriously? France’s 10.7 lineup wasn’t even FRENCH until the MSC came along and now its back to being only Leo 2s from the Netherlands. I might as well just skip straight to the production leclercs.
1 Like
Because the German vehicles are too cool and many people like them, it has resulted in these vehicles having a very high KD.
Another point is that they hate Germany
That shit is diabolical. Gaijin can’t decide whether vehicles should perform under historical circumstances or under ideal circumstances. My favorite 6.7 vehicles get an engine nerf due to wartime constraints yet the Yak-9K gets a bullshit APHE round for a cannon that IRL would break the airframe.
Given my luck, the next update will bring back the brittle armor debuffs that were removed because Gaijin decided to balance vehicles based on ideal circumstances.
6 Likes
No. Artificial stabilizer nerfs should not be used to balance vehicles. Stabilizers should be kept realistic to how they perform in real life, and the XM800T’s stabilizer would NOT only work at low speeds.
1 Like
USS Newport News 6.7 to 6.3 in realistic and arcade battles.
Reason: ship lacks adequate anti-air, armor is lower compared to other heavy cruisers, and is overall more of a sidegrade to its 6.3 counterparts in the United States. Furthermore, this ship struggles especially when facing 7.7 vessels such as Scharnhorst and her sister.