Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

oh yeah i can 100% support that, figuring out how the three F-16As would be formatted in the TT is a challenge tho.

  1. You could keep all the F-16As in a folder but it would mean you have to grind another Falcon to get the F-16A ADF (Late)

  2. Could move the ADF (Late) out of the folder but that would put another jet in between the Block 10 and Block 50

  3. This is extremely unlikely to happen but maybe bump the ADF Late up a rank and folder it with F-16C ← Forgot all the F-16s are the same rank lmao

Chieftain Mk3

Ground RB 8.7 → 8.3

It really has nothing going for it at its current BR

5 Likes

T-62

GRB 8.7 → 8.3

Pointless tank that is outclassed by everything around it

1 Like

ALL high explosive howitzers

GRB +1.0BR

1 Like

bkan at 7.7 is gonna get touched

1 Like

You are forgetting they did it once before with the Panther A
All panther in fact could reach 700 hp but were governed because sabotage/production issues preventing the cooling system from doing its job
but gayjin doing selective bias again

NAh… Big nah lmao.

1 Like

Please reduce the aced reload of the IS-4 to 15 seconds, to match that of the IS-6 and T-10A at the same BR

1 Like

If you’re going to mess with the Merkava Mk.1/2s then it’s time to buff their reload to 5s. It was passed as a suggestion in the past and should be revisited now.

2 Likes

Yes, I know that, ntp, I understood it the first time, but at least they should upload it from br or make the fim-92k buff as they have reported with true files with 20g of rotation

yes

decompression is always welcome, but do it right zzzz
mirage2k5f having a bigger br than the f15(m) and Gripen C is crazy.
This plane is a 13.7 it shouldn’t climb from br.

F15E being 14.0 and f15C being 13.7 is another ready joke…

The f18 problem continues…
f18 A continues to destroy games in 12.3, the early f18C continues to be too strong for 12.7.
f18A should be 12.7 and f18C early should receive 9m to go up to 13.0.
f18C late Finnish without HMD should go down to 13.7.
But absolutely nothing has been done about it.

Problems with the f16…
Several f16s have a lot of inconsistencies in their br and I’ll give examples of how this doesn’t make sense:
Now the mlu, adf will receive aim120 and will go to 13.3 as well as the f16D barak II and this change is positive, now explain to me why the hell the f16AM and f16 OCU will continue on 13.7?
They are exactly like the MLU and ADF with Araam, why won’t they come down from BR?
…and why the f16A remains at 12.3 is the netz at 12.7?

1 Like

It was one thing when the BMP-3 had a fairly low BR and then yes, it would have been a threat, but now the BMP-3 has the reloading of tanks from the 1940s in battles against equipment from the 1980s

1 Like

They did though?

also the reports for the tiger IIs are for the tiger E? and the SLa 16 is just 2 pictures that makes no sense

Bkan deserves to be touched. It’s so annoying

2 Likes

what ? It has an autocannon bro thats what you are supposed to use. The atgm is the secondary which can take out tanks frontaly as a get out of jail free card.

F-15J(M) Changes

BR 13.7 > 14.0

I believe this change should ONLY happen if the F-15J(M) receives IRST and MAWS. The F-15E/I being the same BR as F-15J(M) despite being faster, better acceleration and IRST is criminal. Not to mention it has a plethora of A2G capability- which isn’t all that useful in ARB, but allows for F-15Es to destroy a lot of the AI ground troops.

GIving the F-15J(M) IRST would allow for it to be close to the F-15E in terms of capability- but having a better close range IR missiles, being lighter and better in close range.

Giving the F-15J(M) access to the J/APQ-1 MAWS would allow it to use its speed to escape other aircraft without having to worry about missiles from the rear, or not be snuck up on.

F-15J(M) w/ IRST Pod

image

J/APQ-1 MAWS Accepted Bug Report

1 Like

I do not like the changes that have been made towards the F-16A ADF, F-16AJ and the Italian F-16A ADF. I do not want the AMRAAMs (AIM-120 missiles) to be added and I do not want them to be at battle rating 13.3. ;D

Thank you very much :D

XM800T uptiered and moved after the M3 Bradley? Yikes, what even? This thing has a 20mm autocannon that only pens 66mm at most with its top belt and no ATGM, compared to the Bradley which does have ATGMs and a larger, much more penetrating autocannon. I don’t see why this should be after the Bradley, not unless it’s being reconsidered how similar autocannon only vehicles are balanced in general.