Mode: Air Sim
Vehicle: Ki-84 Ko
BR: 5.0 to 5.7
Extremely good kinematics for its BR, in top speed, manueverability, energy retention and acceleration with no downsides, like top speed. Stomping all non-meta props at 5.0.
At 5.7 it will be close to its successor Ki-84 Otsu at 6.0
The changes for the chinese and French TT are ridiculous, not one asked for it and it is not needed.
AMX-32 at 9.7 really ? MSC at 11.0 defeats the whole point of it existing, just delete it at this point… at least he will be able to line up with his insanely overtiered Super-Etendard i guess, but these are the only 2 French 11.0 that are somewhat playable, so good job shitting on france main another time Gaijin!
And the Chinese 11.0 lineup was very well balanced with plenty of vehicles to choose from with differents purpose/playstyle.
Maybe we don’t have the same definition of balanced tho, looks like gaijin understands it as :
“tank ok ? ok so tank too strong → get some higher br”.
Especialy vt-5 has no business going up in br, even, at 11.0 it’s not that fast, your only armor is your skill or luck, only really good thing about it is the 5 sec autoload.
You guys really blow my mind… War thunder is a really good game and it has literaly not competitor, why not making the game more enjoyable to those who spent thousands of hour on it, instead of adding new top tier premium each patch and destroying line-up.
No, YOU dont get it. this thing gets its turret lolpenned by everything at 9.3, youre just bad at the game.
Please don’t move the AMX-32 to 9.7. It really is not as good as the T-64B. And France does not have a 9.7 lineup. You guys are going to destroy the 9.3 lineup for no reason.
Please do not move the AMX-32 up to 9.7.
yeah I run 4x AMRAAMs and 2x AIM-9Ms
Why increase Namer’s BR?? It’s unreasonable to do so before fixing the issues with his armor and APS not functioning properly.
The only real thing you can do with the F-16A ADF would be to give it 9Ms (making it just a slightly worse F-16C at the same BR) or give it AIM-120C-5s, which will probably also increase its BR to 13.7 (we’re talking about Gaijin here).
T32E1
Reload rate aced → 12.0s
Pain
I could agree with that. I dont think the cl13b would “struggle” at 9.3, but id like to avoid another Shenyang f-5 (one of the worse 9.3 fighters). The problem is that 10.0-10.3 range. Which will be a large amount of games.
Vehicle: Type-90 (All)
Mode: Ground RB
BR: 11.3 to 11.3
Reason: Really? A second off the reload (compared to 11.3 contemporaries, like the CR2 or M1A1) already cost ~100mm in penetration (481mm of JM33 vs 560mm of L27 or 600mm of M890A1). It’s not like the Type-90 is massively faster than the M1A1 either, 28.2 hp/t vs 26.6 hp/t either. Nor is the Type-90s armour anything to talk about.
The Sevesky Soyuz needs to be nerfed. It is significantly better than every other top tier BB.
IS-4M
reload rate aced → 17.0s
Mode: Air Sim
Vehicle: Su-11
BR: 7.0 to 7.7
Significant upgrade over the TT Su-9 at 7.0. Its performance is dramatically above rival 7.0s. At 7.7 it will see a fair competition.
Vehicles & BR:
2S38 10.0 → 10.7
T80UD 10.3 → 10.7
Turm 3 8.3 → 8.7
BMD-4M 9.3 → 9.7 (Same as beglite)
BMD-4 9.3 → 9.7
BMP-3 9.0 → 9.3
Gamemode: Ground RB
We all know that these need to be put up in BR and the only reason they have stayed as is, is because quite a few of them are the most sold premiums and you dont want to hurt sales but come on people will still buy them even with the slight BR adjustments
Conqueror
reload rate aced → 12.0s
Yack 9k 4.7 > 6.0 minimum in ground.
Makes playing 4.7 a task as its just russia destroying your team as soon as they get control over the skies.
idk personally i think giving it AIM-120A and keeping AIM-9L will be enough, its an earlier variant of the F-16 so we don’t want it being too high in BR to where its fighting against the most modern F-16s in the air today
Ideally with decompression aswell, make the Type 90 and TKX (P) are a step away from eachother. The fact the TKX (P) with better mobility, thermals, left/right suspension thingy is the same BR as the Type 90 is crazy. The only downside to the TKX (P) is being slightly larger and having less capacity in the autoloader.
Object 279
Ground RB 9.0 → 9.7
the Object 140 going up means this thing that is so much better in every single way should also move up to its proper BR