Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: NF-5A
BR Change:10.7 → 11.0
Reasoning: better F-5E at lower BR
4 Likes
That still does not justify the clearly inferior other characteristics of the Kfir Gderot when compared to J-7D. I can outplay an A6M2 in the I-16 but the I-16 isn’t a competitor to the A6M2.
I rarely play it now because it gets thrown into 6.3 and 6.7 matches almost all the time.
Thats only against mig 21 pilots who dont know what their doing, which granted is quite a few of them. However, those games against the cunts who main them is pure agony in anything that isnt another mig 21.
wz can very easily manage at 8.0-8.7.
pgz-09 with its non-tracer rounds and no muzzleflash is way too broken still at 8.7.
if they made the mid air ahead explosions & muzzleflash visible to everyone and not just the guy using the pgz-09 it would be much more balanced.
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: J-7D
BR Change:10.7 → 11.0
Reasoning: MiG-21Bis sidegrade at lower BR
9 Likes
However, the radar advantage of the Su34 cannot bring more benefits to the R77, while the J11A can bring more launch opportunities and better launch angles to the R77 within 20km through helmet aiming, and bring more convenience to the aircraft’s energy conservation, because they do not need to move the fuselage, only need to use the helmet to aim instead of turning the fuselage, which can maximize the benefits of high maneuverability of the R77 missile, which the Su34 cannot do
Naval RB: Primauguet 5.0 => 4.7
Inadequate at its battle-rating
1 Like
aight now is it time to bring up MiG-29 9-12 and 9-13 to 13.0 and give them R-73 back
2 Likes
Naval RB: Jeanne D’Arc: 4.7 => 4.3
Inadequate at its battle-rating
1 Like
Game Mode: all
Vehicle:JAS39A, JAS39C, JA37Di, JA37Di F21, JA37D
Add: RB74 as AIM 9Li
Reasoning: With more options for Sweden most of these will end up being 12.0 or similar, something that the current aircraft are filling so adding the Li will increase the BR, make it realistic (Community Bug Reporting System) and add something to fill in gaps for the Danish or Norwegians planes to fill. The JA37C should also really move up and then there would just be huge gap followed by two planes and then huge gap, up until the J35J or others fill the gap.
With the JA37Di its currently the only 13.0 with amraams without an IRCCM missile. it also has the worst radar of the lot (its not bad just worse), its flight performance is somewhat sub par compared to a lot of other planes, although it is not quite the Phantom, the harriers can out turn and out sustain the plane with Viffing and the rest of the competition are just far greater in almost all cases. The Viggen also has a limited amount of missiles, 6 is below average and only 4 are amraams only beating the harriers.
With the Gripens it will make the stock grind far easier, especially the JAS39C, as competitors have better stock grinds
2 Likes
I guess they just forgot it.
The Panthers also remained at their BR after their mobility was nerfed to low tier levels. Which lead to the absurd situation that the best two Panthers (prototype one and Panther D) are at a lower BR than the nerfed ones.
The Type F120 Frigate Köln F220 & Lübeck F224, while they go up, it’s interesting that the Project 159 & Project 35 remain their current BR, even in their nerfed state they should at least go up in BR.
Suggestion,
RB NF
Project 159 & Project 35 to be increased from 4.3 to 4.7.
Reasoning they’re despite their nerfs still a powerhouse in battle if you keep track of your shell fire, This change would at least free up battles between the other SKR’s are 4.0 currently (the Project 50).
That’s the point though. It won’t make much difference to the MSC, but rip using it because what am I going to take with it? I either uptier it to 12.0 or bring the 10.7/10’s up it creates the same problem we had with the 10.7 lineup… there’s no lineup. The entire point of the MSC was to add to a 10.7 lineup and now that’s gone once again. We’re back to square one.
1 Like
Are you joking?
There are 1 or 2, at most 3 more planes which are probably on the same level as the Su-7, being on the same BR.
The Su-7 is the same BR as the Yak-38 which has R-60s. Or the MiG-21.
The MiG-21s are better dogfighters and have missiles at the same BR.
In fact 95% of the other planes at 9.3 BR have missiles and in fact better in almost all aspects.
Su-7 has NOTHING.
Planes at 9.0, even at 8.7 have missiles. Just having to dodge a missile (which you can barely do given the correct circumstances), is a dead sentence, since you probably bled enough energy and speed for the enemy plane to catch up with you.
1 Like
Lmao
Its already worse than every 6.7 heavy tank destroyer more on par with 6.0-6.3s soooo lets put it even higher like 7.0. WHats that Jagtiger is 6.7 ? Yk its german tho.
3 Likes
Vautour (ship) Naval RB: 4.3 => 4.0
Inadequate at its battle-rating
That’s what I wanted to end up reaching, but on top of that in 9.3!! It would be an unfair abomination in its br
1 Like
Tiger II, if this engine modification is correct and “historical,” I want to show this:
“an improved version, the BR-471B (Russian: БР-471Б), was developed in the spring of 1945, but only became available in large numbers after the end of World War II.” Therefore, I want the BR-471D removed from the IS2 and some tank destroyers. This is also a “report.”
Tiger II engine: " With the HL230 , engine bore was increased from 125 to 130 mm (4.9 to 5.1 in). It had a displacement of 23.1 L (23,095 cc; 1,409.3 cu in), or 1,925 cc (117.5 cu in) per cylinder from a bore of 130 mm (5.1 in) and stroke of 145 mm (5.7 in). The maximum power output was 700 PS (690 hp; 510 kW) at 3,000 rpm. Maximum torque is 1,850 N⋅m (1,360 ft⋅lb) at 2,100 rpm. Typical output was 600 PS (590 hp; 440 kW) at 2,500 rpm."
Because at 34km/h tiger II its a bad joke and some players already correct you. Thanks.
4 Likes
Gaijin “Yeah naval decompression was stupid idea. Lets just put it all back in”
1 Like