I guess they just forgot it.
The Panthers also remained at their BR after their mobility was nerfed to low tier levels. Which lead to the absurd situation that the best two Panthers (prototype one and Panther D) are at a lower BR than the nerfed ones.
The Type F120 Frigate Köln F220 & Lübeck F224, while they go up, it’s interesting that the Project 159 & Project 35 remain their current BR, even in their nerfed state they should at least go up in BR.
Suggestion,
RB NF
Project 159 & Project 35 to be increased from 4.3 to 4.7.
Reasoning they’re despite their nerfs still a powerhouse in battle if you keep track of your shell fire, This change would at least free up battles between the other SKR’s are 4.0 currently (the Project 50).
That’s the point though. It won’t make much difference to the MSC, but rip using it because what am I going to take with it? I either uptier it to 12.0 or bring the 10.7/10’s up it creates the same problem we had with the 10.7 lineup… there’s no lineup. The entire point of the MSC was to add to a 10.7 lineup and now that’s gone once again. We’re back to square one.
Are you joking?
There are 1 or 2, at most 3 more planes which are probably on the same level as the Su-7, being on the same BR.
The Su-7 is the same BR as the Yak-38 which has R-60s. Or the MiG-21.
The MiG-21s are better dogfighters and have missiles at the same BR.
In fact 95% of the other planes at 9.3 BR have missiles and in fact better in almost all aspects.
Su-7 has NOTHING.
Planes at 9.0, even at 8.7 have missiles. Just having to dodge a missile (which you can barely do given the correct circumstances), is a dead sentence, since you probably bled enough energy and speed for the enemy plane to catch up with you.
Lmao
Its already worse than every 6.7 heavy tank destroyer more on par with 6.0-6.3s soooo lets put it even higher like 7.0. WHats that Jagtiger is 6.7 ? Yk its german tho.
Vautour (ship) Naval RB: 4.3 => 4.0
Inadequate at its battle-rating
That’s what I wanted to end up reaching, but on top of that in 9.3!! It would be an unfair abomination in its br
Tiger II, if this engine modification is correct and “historical,” I want to show this:
“an improved version, the BR-471B (Russian: БР-471Б), was developed in the spring of 1945, but only became available in large numbers after the end of World War II.” Therefore, I want the BR-471D removed from the IS2 and some tank destroyers. This is also a “report.”
Tiger II engine: " With the HL230 , engine bore was increased from 125 to 130 mm (4.9 to 5.1 in). It had a displacement of 23.1 L (23,095 cc; 1,409.3 cu in), or 1,925 cc (117.5 cu in) per cylinder from a bore of 130 mm (5.1 in) and stroke of 145 mm (5.7 in). The maximum power output was 700 PS (690 hp; 510 kW) at 3,000 rpm. Maximum torque is 1,850 N⋅m (1,360 ft⋅lb) at 2,100 rpm. Typical output was 600 PS (590 hp; 440 kW) at 2,500 rpm."
Because at 34km/h tiger II its a bad joke and some players already correct you. Thanks.
Gaijin “Yeah naval decompression was stupid idea. Lets just put it all back in”
M36B2 (FR) Ground RB: 5.7 => 5.3
Inadequate at its battle-rating
Vehicle: SPz-12-3 LGS
BR Change: Keep 6.7
Compared to m50, it is slower and has less firepower. Its speed is also far inferior to that of the fiat 6614.
In the next update, the German Tiger II will be even slower, allowing American light tanks to more freely capture points and maneuver. What’s the justification for increasing the SPz’s battle rating?
Something something R2Y2 perhaps?
Merkava Mk.2D AB and RB 10.3 => 9.7
I will never ever buy any tank in the game.
I have bought Mekava 2D when it was 9.7. and now will be completely unplayable.
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Shenyang F-5
BR Change: 9.3 > 9.0
Reasoning: The Shenyang faces all aspect/high G IR missiles frequently (R60, 9G, 9J, 9L). Not to mention, the Lim/PF 17s are .7 lower with similar plane performance!!!
Due to it having missiles, 9.0 would but much more fair.
Suggestion,
RB NF
Restigouche class destroyer 4.0 - 4.3
When played currently the HMCS Terra Nova DDE-259 is a beast, it’s after the HE changes quite devastating with the forward 3"/70 QF Mk. N1 cannons, with the vessel only held back by the WWII vintage 3"/50 Mk.22 cannons on the stern (definitely should’ve been a gulf war refit with a 20 mm, than it would be a 4.7 easily).
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Mig-17AS
BR Change: 9.0 > 8.7
Reasoning: The 17AS lacks performance that of 9.0 aircraft. The LIM/PF 17s are substantially better in performance. While the AS does have missiles, i believe this advantage no longer warrants a .3 increase.
Super Etendard: Make Magic 1 available stock and remove modification
Ok, can I get my Refund on the Obj. 140 please? Bought excluseviley for my 8.3 line up which has been wrecked now.
Namer 30 11.3 > 10.7. As it stands currently, this vehicle does not perform well at its current br. If anything, it should go back down to its original BR and not up even more.
these are my stats in the Kfir C.1
these are my stats on the Mig-21 airframe (just showing these so you can see what experience I’m coming from)
imo the missiles on J-7D are the defining factor, flight performance-wise it’s not that special given the ok-ish engine and how quickly it bleeds energy. Kfir C.1, while it does have 2 fewer missiles will less capabilities has the engine power to stomp a Mig-21. I’ll have to do a few test to see how they perform at lower speeds (below 250mph)