better*
the PD radar makes a huge difference
1 Like
-
2S38 uptier should apply to RB as well.
-
Also why do Tiger 2’s need a nerf?
Point 1 reeks of a half measure made appease people without really doing anything
Point 2 just seems asinine.
MSC, which is gaining strength thanks to Gaijin, has even less reason to play in French 10.7. We’re back to the situation before the update with only one tank in 10.7 and another in 11.0. Frankly, we can remove the 2a4 premium, it’s no longer useful in any line-up xD
Meanwhile, the Bmd 3 and 4, or even the 2S38, do not increase in Br. You really need to stop looking at the raw stats of vehicles and look at how many players are using them, because if one vehicle is played by only 1,000 players in one week and another by 10,000 players in the same week, the stats will be completely different. Imagine that the 1,000 players who have good games with that vehicle will have good stats, but if it is for the second vehicle, if only 1,000 players have good games and 9,000 do not have good games, this completely negates, or even reduces, the vehicle stats in the calculations and is simply not good and stupid in the current game.
3 Likes
F16A Adf (USA), F16A Adf (Italy), F16A (MLU)
Br 12.7 - Br 13.0
Aim 120 A has been added
br 13.3 is not going to work, if u add Aim 120 A and Aim 9M would be perfect at 13.3 but a plane with Aim 9L in Br 13.3 its crazy.
And we can agrre 120s shouldt be uptierd right?
Its has m60 hull and uts super slow
So better to give sabra 1sec more reload and leave it
You increased the max BR to 14.3 in the worst way possible.
Decompress by splitting 13.0 into 2 groups, by moving every 13.3+ up by 0.3, and moving the Flankers, F-2, F-15A, Tornado F.3 late, and the F-4F ICE up to the new 13.3 BR bracket. This will massively help the game and decompress where it’s needed.
Also rip tiger IIs.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Lvrbv 701
9.7 > 9.3
Reasoning: The Lvrbv 701 is severely outclassed by most other SPAAs at its BR, with its only advantage being range. However, it struggles to make use of said range, as it lacks any means of easily detecting aircraft. It is best used against helicopters, but at 9.7, it starts facing helicopters that can hover close to its maximum range. This wouldn’t be an issue if it carried a search radar or IRST, but having to visually identify targets makes it significantly harder to use. Additionally, it is entirely outranged by helicopters in any sort of uptier, which, at 9.7, is not uncommon.
When faced with planes, it once again suffers due to its inability to quickly spot them. The Lvrbv 701’s poor turret traverse and limited elevation angles make it ineffective against most aircraft it will face, as they either climb too high or stay too low and close to be targeted efficiently.
When compared to SPAAs at its BR it is mediocre at best, when compared to anything higher BR it is entirely obsolete. With several other SAMs already found at lower BRs, I do not believe lowering the Lvrbv 701’s BR will suddenly make it broken, simply slightly more useable. You will still have to rely on eyeballs mk1 to spot and engage targets. (Not to mention that the French Roland is ALSO at 9.7, and it is simply better in every way.)
Additionally, at 9.3 it would fit much nicer into a lineup, as currently the Strf 9040B is the only other 9.7 ground vehicle Sweden has access to, ignoring premiums.
2 Likes
100% identical seeker iirc. So they should be the same in that regard. Just that maybe the 9Ls keep the flares out of the seeker a little longer as its pulling less G if you lead the missile
Netz should be 12.7, its dumb. Especially with the F-16AM at 13.0 that clowns it, Let alone the Gripen A.
Kurnass 2000… Its tough, with far far weaker Phantoms at 12.0.
1 Like
by “kit” I thought you were referring to the missile set.
Of which the F4E has 2 more of the AIM-7E-2s.
still, I don’t think it should be 11.7 over 11.3.
J-8F
13.0>13.7, add PL-8B
Reasoning:
Decompression, moving ARH carriers away from 3rd gens, and adding a much-needed IRCCM
1 Like
No its not its good but not op and in fm is way less important then the kit
Strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
i really don’t understand the 9.0
i don’t believe it can be compared to tank like OF40 mk2, X803, M60 TTS, Leo A1, Class 3 P, 279, BMP3, the Chinese 9.0 gen 2 thermal gang other of the biggest offender of 9.0 the TAM
or be betther than the JAPZ.K A2 / and the SK-105 A2 that are 8.7 but have more tech (gen 2 thermal, drone, spotting, a turret ; ), and even a better round) with the same fire rate
the fact of the transmission always breaking while receiving shot no armor against APFSDS you’re dead if you get hit and at 30 degree sideways you can’t aim (even more hull aim is already a tragedy by itself) really compromise its performance and usability
5 Likes
Su-27/J-11
13.0>13.7
Reasoning: decompression and these are some of the better 13.0s.
Aircraft: A-7D
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
BR change: 10.3 → 9.7
Reason: at the current moment the A-7D is a very slow and poorly armed platform for its battle rating, only having 2 Aim-9J’s. The poor speed, poor ability to turn, and poor armament mean that the A-7D will never reach its targets. Another reason is that the Harrier is a much faster aircraft with similar air to air armament at a much lower BR
Su-33
13.0>13.7
Reasoning: decompression and one of the better 13.0s
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It’s definitely rough for the Kurnass 2000. I’m not sure if its weaker than something like the F4J UK (that thing should be 11.7 anyway), but there’s no reason the 2000 should be at the same BR as the EJ kai or the F-18A.
I think 12.0 is fair for it.
Going back over the “BR increase” I just realised how much it sounds like I want the Netz at 12.3
No, that’s a horrible idea.
Was just pointing out how stupid it is that the F-16A is 12.3
Try to guide multiple rockets on multiple weapons, you can’t unless you go trough a complex process of breaking the TWS lock but keeping the radar scanning.
Beside it also tends to lock on ammunition dropped by a plane.
Tunguska has a more stable tracking than it…
Mirage 4000
13.0>13.7
Reasoning: decompression and one of the better 13.0s
JAS-39A
13.0>13.7
Reasoning: decompression and one of the better 13.0s