We need a downvote button
It doesnt stop
8 Likes
JF-17
13.3>14.0
Reasoning: decompression
ARB
Mirage 2000C-S4
BR: 12.3 → 12.7
It’s a C-S5 without the chaff pods.
This means it does NOT have 112 chaff given to it that the C-S5 has
However, this should not allow it to be a lower BR, as the C-S5 is already a very potent 12.7.
1 Like
just ay you don’t like decompression little bro
Mode : Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle : Merkava Mk.2D
Change : 10.0 → 10.0
Reasoning : Neither the maneuverability nor the armor of the Merkava Mk. 2D are commensurate with a 10.3, and it is clear that it is not on par with the T-72AV or T-80UD.
Its firepower is also average for a 10.0, and not particularly good.
It is impossible to raise it to 10.3 when BR 9.7 was appropriate for the vehicle in the first place.
3 Likes
Yeah, you gotta be ragebaiting at this point.
3 Likes
I concede, Kit is more important
The F-15A is similar in the 1v1 to an F-16 Block 15. The energy generation is second only to the F-15E/I, and it is extremely fast at altitude. It has a vulcan with 940 rounds. It has 240 regular calibre countermeasures. It has a strong radar and strong IR missiles for 13.0.
The ONLY thing that is not excellent about it is the AIM-7Ms. It quite literally excels in every other category, keep in mind that some of the vehicles it cannot out-turn it can energy-trap.
Fortunately for you, I think WalletWorrier is very likely to also suggest moving up the Su-27.
F-16D Barak II
13.3>14.0
Reasoning: decompression
Aircraft: A-7E
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
BR change: 10.7 → 9.7
Reason: much like the A-7D, the A-7E is extremely poor for its battle rating if not sitting at an even worse position. While it carries the better Aim-9G’s it is once again a very slow platform and unlike the A-7E has no long range air to ground munitions. And once again the A-7E is slower than the AV-8C sitting at 9.7 all the while sharing the same air to air armament
2 Likes
Tiger 2 Sla. shouldn’t be touched people paid for that… why did any Tiger II need a nerf to begin with?
2S38
10.3 → Reserve
Reasoning: Raising the K/D
5 Likes
Harrier GR1 9.7 → 9.3 br
3 Likes
Vehicle: CV 9030 FIN
Gamemode: Realistic
BR Change: 9.3 → 8.3
Reasoning:
while the CV 90 platform in it’s entirely is pretty good, the 9030FIN on the other hand is extremely lackluster at the 9.3 battlerating, being stuck with a 30mm bushmaster and no additional weaponry to support it. Vehicles of the same capability (example. Warrior and M3 Bradley) are at 8.3 and has a secondary weapon additionally from the main gun, which is also around 25-30mm.
While the CV9030’s armor is somewhat better than the Warrior and the Bradley, it still does not justify the vehicle being around the same battle rating as the BMP-3, BMD-4, BMD-4M and Begleitpanzer 57. If it is to stay around 9.3, then it should have a secondary weapon, which it doesn’t. It only features a 30mm bushmaster with lackluster dart performance.
2 Likes
I don’t think either of you realize this is all part of bringing top BR to 15.0 becasue you don’t read
2 Likes
This is the worst way to “decompress.” Littler bro.
read
careful the player stats might actually be bad enough for the Snail to consider it xD
Its compressed as hell that BR. F-18A should be 12.7
I didnt read it like that.But it is an aircraft that needs TLC
Its definetly stronger than the 9L only F-16s, but much weaker than the Aim-9M F-16s and Gripen A. So 12.7 is fine for RB, but SB, its dumb as hell to be 13.0
1 Like
Not gonna happen because the round doesnt exist per se.
The are no SAPHEI rounds for the 57/70 platform, other than the “57 mm smgr m/70 f k sar”, which is basically an HE/HC round with a ballistic + penetrator cap and a delayed-action PD-Fuze.
(Technically there are HCER and HCER-BB but these arent compatible with the Mk 1).
The only other round that could maybe (technically) work is the slpgr m/44, but this round wasnt made for the 57/60 or 57/70 and thus it’s questionable whether it’d be possible to move this projectile into the 57/70 cartridge (57x438R). The only other round this was done with, is the slpprj m/67 (APCBC-T), which was however made for the 57/60 platform with the soon to-be-introduced 57/70 platform in mind.
Is this post even gonna be counted since it includes two vehicles rather than separate vehicle suggestions?