Neg. Not enough flares
1 Like
thats bull, why would Gaijin intentionally force a worse organization of ideas?
Please move the FGR.2 a bit lower in br, 12.0 is too much of an overtier, along with the other phantoms, otherwise move certain fox 3 carriers to 13.3
1 Like
FGR2 should stay put but get buffs. FG1 though should move down. No point having 2x identical aircraft at the same BR
1 Like
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: J6K1
BR Change: 6.7 → 6.3
The J6K1 is yet another fairly manouevrable plane with excellent firepower which benefits from high winrates. The J6K1 is outlcassed at 6.7 in terms of speed and energy. The performance when compared to the Spitfire F Mk 24 at its own BR, and the P-51H-5 at 6.3 looks pretty mediocre. I understand why people do well in it, but its actual strength as a vehicle is limited.
3 Likes
A mod answered, its included with the Tiger 2p change
It’s not worse, it’s more orderly if they can go vehicle suggestion one by one rather than a whole post mixing up a bunch of vehicle suggestions.
Especially light vehicles at thst
This
Must be one of the most asked for change
“Gajin listens” and funks the f16.
Do something we actually want
I agree a lot with this, the FGR.2 is underperforming a lot due to the constant uptiers, it faces fox 3’s most of the time, I hope it gets moved to 11.7 or gets some buffs, and the fg1, I dont really see a reason on why it should be in 12.0.
Nice job GAYjin, ruining 2 french lineups making it no lineups anymore in single update.
Also keeping 2s38, bmp 3 bmd 4 or not raising anything that’s russian confirms that you guys really favour russian TT. I don’t care if bots are running them and destroying overal stats, those are OP vehicles.
3 Likes
Why does the XM800T keep getting perpetually raised in BR?
Cant wait to see it at 10.3 by the end of next year
2 Likes
Su-34 at 13.7
2 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: MSC
BR Change: 10.7 → 11.0/11.3
If this BR change is needed, a buff to the reload speed would be appreciated. I say 11.3 because the reload can go down to 3s max (I understand that the reload speed is a balancing tool). Anything better would be appreciated, even just 5s like the other Leclercs!
See this “accepted” report for the reload speed:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uakoAAOUVhKR
3 Likes
Jaguar A
Remove Magic 1 modification and make the missile stock.
Jaguar at 10.7 without a missile in Air RB is useless, not only that, british Jaguar Gr 1A gets Aim 9G stock.
11 Likes
+1
AGS not getting M900 on this spreadsheet is criminal given the future vehicles it’s gonna have to fight. T-90M can already shrug off M833 with its upgraded ERA package, making side shots a gamble unless you’re quick enough to aim below the side skirts
4 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: FGR.2 and FG.1
BR Change: 12.0 → 11.7
Both the phantoms sitting at 12.0 is an over tier, I believe it should be moved to 11.7 or they should be given buffs accordingly, they are seriously underperforming at the current BR they are at, constantly faces fox 3’s, and 4th gen aircrafts, its a fun aircraft, but I hate to see it get slaughtered due to the terrible BR it’s put at.
PS: Also, the FGR.2 and FG.1 and a lot of phantoms usually tend to fight aircrafts like gripen, which in my opinion is VERY unfair.
7 Likes
Vehicle: F-16A ADF, F-16A ADF (Italy) & F-16A MLU
Gamemode: All
Change: Add IRCCM IR Missiles such as Aim-9M or Aim-9Li
Reason: It would be extremely unreasonable to have any aircraft above 13.0 without IRCCM missiles, especially with the F-16D Barrak II at the same BR of 13.3 already gets Aim-9Ms
7 Likes
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: A-10C
BR Change: 11.7 → 12.0
Reason: While being a slow platform, the A-10C has more than enough to make up for it with MAW, HMD and four AIM-9M, which can be aimed with the HMD. Fairly maneuverable it can easily take on everything and never run out of ordnance. It simply doesn’t belong at 11.7 as the BRs in this game mode work differently and there’s barely anything to take on it considering what it’s equipped with.
2 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: AMX
BR Change: 10.7 → 9.3 and removal of AIM-9L
When the L-39ZA was introduced, it was explained that it would not carry AAMs despite being able to IRL in order to place the vehicle at a BR that is more appropriate for its flight model. This is fantastic logic, but I dont understand why it was just applied to the L-39 and not all the other subsonic attackers with high-powered missiles (think Su-25, A-10, etc.) The AMX has a unique flight model and carries a vulcan, it would be a welcome addition to the 9.3 region where I suspect it would play like hunter with a different set of quirks, I suspect it would be fun to play and rather balanced at around this BR. It is wasted sitting at 10.7 with AIM-9Ls