r73 is slow bro
Most have either all aspect ir missiles or decent radar missiles and they have good airframes aswell.
You said that players are good as long as they arent from mainland china that is straight up racism bro what is there to explain
r73 is slow bro
I know, it’s the worst irccm missile in the entire game, was just testing people’s opinion.
Most have either all aspect ir missiles or decent radar missiles and they have good airframes aswell.
Only the F-4E ticks most of these boxes and it’s radar is abysmal. The MiG23MLD is the clear winner if it wasn’t for people using r60m’s only instead of r13m, which, like aim9j and pl5b, are able to kill tornadoes, phantoms and mig23s head on below 0.8km (lock-launch)
You said that players are good as long as they arent from mainland china that is straight up racism bro what is there to explain
Wrong, you just made up this assumption before i explained it, and are getting political about cn/taiwan about this. Most china players are from China, most US players are from USA, most taiwan players are from taiwan, most france players are french, and so on, and it is EMPIRICAL that the nation mains from said nation are bad, because they’re the majority that play said nation.
No ?
That’s why they are separated by a whole BR.
Ja37c has insane radar+radar missiles and good fm. The mig21 bis has good fm + all aspect missiles. The j8b has aspides and pl5bs even tho the radar is horrid. So you cant have all 3 but you have 2 which is more than having 1 which is the case for the j7e
sorry but i’d take four pl5b’s over six r60m’s, thats why i only use r13m1’s which are close to pl5b in accel but smoke across most of their flight and have a pitiful pivoting threshold of the seeker.
thats bc they are better missiles duh ? Thats why the j7d is better than the mig21 bis
Okay and ?
Shout out to my RTH brothers in Christ
What does that have to do with anything ?
11.0 tanks should be at a disadvantage when facing 12.0s.
the seeker FOV of the PL-5B is 2.4°, thats exactly 0.1° smaller than most other rear aspect missiles, the low drag and fast strong booster just makes them have giga range while burned out and that’s it, the flare resistance is the exact same
also remember that it is basically a 21MF airframe (SPO-10 included), highest it could go is 11.0, you are just crying as usual because you’re getting clapped by it
1 Like
putting at 11.3 is just cope. Its straight up op in 10.7 but it would be balanced at 11.0
1 Like
Super Etendard: 11.0 => 10.7 (Ground RB)
5 Likes
So this is going to 7.0:
And this is coming to the game at 6.7:
Might as well send it up now, it’s not going to be 6.7 long.
Yuck. Can’t stand people who leave uptiers.
6 Likes
I don think Obj140 at 8.7 is a good idea. APHE is nice but 1 step BR less than the OBj 279? Also, slow reload, most rounds will punch through the armor.
Brother, they literally have the Object435 at 9.0. They’re seriously underrating the 279, despite the increasing wins, kills per death, and kills per spawn of the 279.
1 Like
Both AMX-30b2’s
GRB
8.7->8.3
Reason: lack of stabilizer is so disadvantageous at 8.7. another reason is the fixed 10.0X zoom optic.
4 Likes
All M4 Shermans are already OP at 3.3, 3.7, and even 4.0.
What? M4A1 is an absolute babymobile and I was getting 10 kill games in it even when I had an unexperted, sub-level 10 crew.
Oh god that’s BAD bad
5 Likes
I think everyone would agree that the Tu-4’s BR needs to be reduced, at least to 7.0.
I was thinking why does his name remind me of something and io behold, he had this absolute piece of thought to share
3 Likes