Tiger IIH,SLa16,P and jagdtiger but what about the 10.5 and kungstiger?
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: P-51D-10
BR Change: 5.0 > 4.7
P-51D-5 with some improvements, though not enough to stay at 5.0
3 Likes
The 10,5 uses an diffrent engine/Gearbox and is therefore not effected
They just forgot the Kungstiger
4 Likes
La-9 6.0 ->5.7
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: T30
Reloading rate: 29.9s → 20s
Reasoning:
Currently, the T30 does not have an advantage in shell penetration compared to its peers, the T34 and M6A2E1, at the 6.7 battle rating. Additionally, due to a significant shell drop, its performance at long-range engagements is poor. Furthermore, its low reload speed results in damage output that is well below the average for its tier. By increasing the T30’s rate of fire, its combat effectiveness can be significantly improved, making it more appealing and encouraging more players to try out this unique and interesting vehicle.
6 Likes
Mode: ARB
Vehicle: Yak-3U & VK107
BR change: 5.7–>6.0
The Yak-3Us are incredibly strong props, boasting a very good climb and turn rate.
It’s guns are a bit lackluster- 2x 20mms with 120 rounds each, which I believe is the justification for 5.7
However, its flight performance is criminally good for a 5.7, and the plane should sit at a higher BR for 6.0
The VK107 has a different engine but I believe overheats more?
9 Likes
What are you on about?
My pantsir plays perfeclty well,
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: B-17G
BR Change: 6.3 > 6.0
It is no better than the B-24D, nor even the Ju 288C
2 Likes
Leave the F-16A ADF at 12.7 with no AMRAAM. Add an F-16 Block 30 or smth to close the gap between the A and the C.
4 Likes
I’m leaning more towards a foldered F-16ADF (Late) with the AIM-120s. Therefore, everyone’s happy.
3 Likes
Mode GRB
Type 81 (C) 11.7 → 11.3
This thing is basically a Strela on steroid and that’s about it, it doesn’t have any radar and the missile have max range of like 5 km (although really good missile). Moving it to 11.3 would at least give it a proper line up among the Type 90s. Or let it stay at 11.7 but give it the SAHR missile.
Type 87 RCV 9.0 → 8.3
There is no reason for this thing to be where it is when it have no LRF, thermal or stab and it drive like a bus, yea yea skill issue or whatever but this thing is just way too overtier especially when the BMD-4s is at the same br, hell the Type 89 is at the same br and it is everything this thing wanted. 8.3 would also gave it a proper line up with the Type 74
4 Likes
Valentine I
2.3 → 2.7 2.3 → 2.3 (hold current BR)
The Valentine I not 2.7 worthy, is we compare it to the Matilda II also at 2.7,
the Matilda has:
- Same gun
- More armour (25% thicker, angles and volumetric makes the Matilda’s armour much more effective)
- equal mobility (lower HP/T but better handling)
- 5 degrees more gun depression
- HE shell (though is practically useless)
- 1 more Crew Member
- less smoke grenades
13 Likes
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: Yak-3 (e)
BR Change: 4.3 > 4.7
A single machinegun is not enough to varrant a lower BR over the regular Yak-3
6 Likes
Added 12.3 and 13.3 brackets to sim, cool.
Removed 12.7. WHY? Always one step forward two steps back.
1 Like
Mode: ARB
FW190D-9
5.0 → 4.7
Probably a skill issue on my part, but I found this plane incredibly weak for 5.0
It just doesn’t turn. the roll rate is great but it handles like an absolute truck. The guns are inconsistent but most of the time adequate.
you can energy fight in it, of course, its a 190. However, I found it to be an incredibly irritating experience.
3 Likes
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: J7W1
BR Change: 5.7 > 5.0
Flight performance is nowhere near any current 5.7 or possibly even lower in some cases
Low ammo amount, very difficult to fly and not spin out
8 Likes
hummm stange not seeing the yak-9k with the 45mm not being moved up in br for ground battles from 4.7 even tho it wipes out a bunch of tanks alot being one shots aswell with the pure aphe belt
i would suggest an increase to 5.0 or even 5.3
6 Likes
Yes, but if you lose one crew member (loader) 2A4 would have a much worse reload speed than MSC which has permanent 6s reload. I think this is a decent tradeoff.
I highly doubt they haven’t accounted the difference in skill levels between major and minor nations.
I do believe MSC should be one jump above certain 10.7s.
What you described is a mostly compression issue.
Mode: ARB
Ju-388J
4.3 → 3.7
The 388J is based off the existing Ju 88 frame, but has upgraded engines, and a gun pack.
However, the gun pack is offset and pointed at a downwards angle, which makes it ridiculously hard to aim, alongside the bomber airframe and rudder not helping you whatsoever.
It gets the Interceptor airspawn but it’s climbrate is abysmal and fighters will often beat you to altitude.
Also loves catching fire.
4 Likes
Z46&Z47 should not go 5.0 cuz they don’t even have a SAP or base fuze HE and that means they can not deal much damage to high tier ships