Not that it needs it, but with the AGS moving could it receive M900 now that it’s 11.7?
5 Likes
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: Strikemaster Mk.88
BR Change: 6.3 > 6.7
Faster than any propeller plane, and even faster than some 6.7 jets while having better flight performance at the cost of a weaker armament, but that doesn’t matter if it just wins either way
I also don’t like the idea of jets below 6.7
4 Likes
I can’t believe it. Do the people who operate and develop this game really understand it less than the players? If the Begleitpanzer 57 deserves a BR increase, then I can’t think of any reason why the 2S38 and BMD-4M haven’t been raised—especially the BMD-4M. It’s single-handedly turning the 9.0 to 10.0 BR range into a complete mess, for both teams. Most people who bought this vehicle don’t even know how to play it properly—they just leave the game after losing it. And the so-called ‘statistical balance’ just seems to rely on raw in-game data comparisons, which is unfair. This will lead to a terrible outcome: the worse you perform, the more influence you have over the game’s balance. at this point, I’d rather believe development team is deliberately avoiding BR adjustments for these vehicles just to boost their sales.
2 Likes
1 Like
ah yea still the kungstiger
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Grand Vehicle: Begleitpanzer 57
BR change: 9.3→9.3 (with APDS added)
Reasoning:
First: Begleitpanzer 57 now has an only 600hp engine, which makes its mobility seriously bad, 20pwr is really bad for a light vehicle at 9.3
Second: its 57mm gun had only 47 pen at 60º . This makes it hard to pen tanks at a even a bit huge angle
Begleitpanzer 57’s missile is bad----only 630pen and not even Tandem ATGM. Honestly,it is quite useless at 9.3.
1 Like
Incorrect buzzer
P-59A is 6.7
1 Like
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: A-10C
BR Change:12.0→11.7
A10c nearly cant do any thing at ground RB for its SNAIL speed. The existence of the new Spaas and Air Superiors made so hard for a10c to get into the launch range of the agm65s.
6 Likes
instead of make SAAB-105G 8.3,i think it belongs to 9.0
2 Likes
Super props against early jets is everytime a standoff.
In my opinion, to relieve the battles between props and jets, it would make sense, to put an empty gap between 6.7 and 7.0 ish, so 1.0-6.7 stays and 7.0-x.x moves up one step (7.0–>7.3, 7.3–>7.7 and so on).
1 Like
5.7* for ARB.
1 Like
Itpsv+strv104
8.0 with ccip and 1000lb bombs and heatseeker fighting non radar gun aa seems super unfair bro
Vehicle: M3A3 Bradley
Mode: Ground RB
BR: 10.0 to 9.3
Reason: Overall a mid IFV. Mediocre main gun, okay missile, bad survivability, mid mobility, no proxy round, top-down ATGM used to be broken but nerfed to the ground and are now rather useless, no real upgrade for it to be so much higher BR than the previous Bradley (8.3).
3 Likes
Aren’t Lubeck and Koln already 4.3?
I think 9.7 would be more fair for it tbf. Can see it being reasonable at 9.3 though
1 Like
wassup
Yes, but if you lose one crew member (loader) 2A4 would have a much worse reload speed than MSC which has permanent 6s reload. I think this is a decent tradeoff.
Incorrect, If you lose one crew member (loader) the commander will replace it. The only time the 2A4 will have a worse reload is with 2 total crew members (which means 2 already died, something MSC cannot survive).
I highly doubt they haven’t accounted the difference in skill levels between major and minor nations.
They don’t, this is a very well known fact for War Thunder, they use vehicle statistics for BR, they do not take into consideration skill difference in players themselves. A very obvious example is the Panzer 3N from the Italian tech tree, identical to the German one, yet a higher BR.
I do believe MSC should be one jump above certain 10.7s.
What you described is a mostly compression issue.
Which 10.7’s vehicles is MSC superior to? Yes, some are victims of compression, that doesn’t mean MSC should go to 11.0 though. Other vehicles are victims of compression, but unless they’re better than 2A4, which is the king of 10.7, then the problem is not MSC, but the other vehicle performing worse. Compression is the issue itself in the bracket we’re talking about. The only 10.7 vehicle that I think is worse could be T-80B, which is slightly better than its 10.3 tech tree counterparts but not good enough as to be equal to other 10.7’s. Abrams is good at 10.7, Challenger 1’s too, and even Ariete (P) which is quite good. I don’t think MSC is especially better than any of these tanks other than T-80B.
4 Likes
Mode: ARB
Plane: NF-5A
BR: 10.7→11.0
The NF-5A (as it stands) is a straight improvement to the F-5C, and even better than the F-5E in some regards.
The BR changes sheet does indicate that its countermeasure count will be dropped, but I don’t feel that’s enough for the NF-5A
Put it at 11.0, alongside the F-5E
3 Likes
your comment lost all credibility when you said Su-30SM gets OP flight performance lol.
F-15E has very good flight performance and has the best BVR missile in the game. It deserves its place alongside euro fighters.
1 Like
And russias 9.3 zsu23m4 even gets IGLA S now, it was better than the ozelot from the start so yeah, why is the ozelot at a higher br.
2 Likes