Don’t get me started on the Mig-27’s they are both 11.7 in ASB for some unbeknownst reason.
Air AB, Mystere IIC. 8.7 → 8.3 : same issues than its big brother but with even worst flight performances, especially acceleration.
6 Likes
Air AB, AV-8A. 9.3 → 9.7 : almost untouchable if flighted well with its countermeasures, huge climb rate and (too much) good missiles for its BR.
2 Likes
Air AB, Yak-38 (the standard one and the M variant). 9.3 → 9.7 : insanely good missiles for its BR (R60s!).
2 Likes
Hello
Mode:GRB
Vehicle: Jaguar IS " Great Britain "
BR Change : 11.0 TO 10.7 in GRB
In great Britain you have so many setups for 10.7 it’s the same like American A-6E TRAM with less laser ammunition bombs almost same speed and feel totally unplayable in 11.0 or higher and cannot fit in any setup in British ground Battles
Please think about this change seriously thanks
1 Like
Air AB, Ki-84 hei. 7.7 > 7.0. : 7.7 is way too high for a prop plane with poor top speed.
3 Likes
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: Spitfire LF Mk9 (and all its subvariants)
BR Change: 5.0 > 5.7
There is a reason they are 5.7 in ARB, they’ve been sitting at 5.0 with OP flight performance due to the lack of BR changes
3 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Aircraft: SAAB-105G
Change: 8.3 > 8.0
After 8.7 setup got wrecked, 105G remains in a spot without a singular tank. Putting it down by .3 will make 8.0 tank setup a lot better
1 Like
Why raise PT-16 and Leopard 2AV?
Raising AGS without m900 is crazy!
8 Likes
Air AB All the Ki-49s. 3.3 > 3.0 & 3.7 > 3.3 : poorly armored bombers with small bomb loads and average speed compare to other nations at the same Brs.
1 Like
Ground AB, E.B.R. (1951). 4.3 > 4.0 : useless gun at its BR and no line-up to bring with it.
8 Likes
Ground AB & RB, MEPHISTO. 8.7 > 9.0 with the addition of HOT-3 missiles it historically carried : really similar to the chinese AFT-09 which is literally a copy of it. Moving it also at 9.0 allows it to be a good support for the 9.3 lineup. There are already 4 ground vehicles at 8.7 at the moment and none at 9.0 in the french tree.
6 Likes
Mode: ARB
Plane: Harrier GR.7
Battle rating: 12.3–>12.0
The GR.7 is a Harrier II airframe, notably lacking the stronger engines found on the AV8B Plus and AV8B NA (about 1000kgf weaker), and has the air to air loadout of 4 AIM-9Ms.
However, I cannot justify it sitting at a battle rating of 12.3 without a radar, especially since the A-10C sits at 11.7 with a much better A2G loadout and a HMD, as after all the GR.7 is a strike aircraft.
Sure, the A-10C is slower, which is why I am suggesting the GR.7 to be 12.0 opposed to 11.7, but I can’t find any reason the GR.7 should fight F-16ADF and other block 15/20 variants after they recieve their AMRAAMs.
5 Likes
Switch places between the F-100D and the Alpha Jet E in the french tech tree, respectively a fighter in the attacker line and an attacker in the fighter line… Moreover it seems logical to me for the super saber to be after an other sabre and before the F-8 which is literally based on the F-100.
The french (dutch) sea fury needs to be moved in the benelux line of the tech tree.
3 Likes
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: Ki-84ko
BR Change: 5.0 > 5.3
Very good flight performance, simple to fly, should go a little higher
3 Likes
VT5 and MBT2000 are simply not worth a BR of 11.3. Compared to the 90B at the same battle rating, they look like clowns.
the F-8 is based on WHAT?!
1 Like
Mode: ASB
Vehicle: P-51D-5 (and D-20)
BR Change: 5.0 > 4.3
Extremely bad flight performance when compared to other planes, difficult to fly, weak engine
4 Likes
Mode: ARB
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.2
BR change: 9.3–>8.7/9.0
the S.2 currently sits at a BR of 9.3 (for some reason)
It is a subsonic, strike aircraft with no guns, no countermeasures and AIM-9Bs to defend itself.
There is no reason a plane like this should sit at such a high BR, where it can even face all aspect missiles.
10 Likes