Probably due to the countermeasures staying at 60 and lacking TWS and HMS.
Just think of it from the other side, ADF at 13.7 would be same BR as F-16C, lacking a lot of countermeasures a TWS radar, a HMS, IRCCM missiles, and a whole fucking lot of ground ordinance, so you would give it a BR change because it was underused just to make it straight up unusable.
Plus being at the same BR as Mig 29 SMT, but with severe radar limitation I don’t think they will be that bad.
J-7D still at 10.7 instead of 11.0
Sure bro 👍
M2K and Yak-141 would say hello.
French and Russia can face US as enemy side and they are not that hard for wiping tons of F/A-18C spammers and F-14s.
spyder and All multi vehicle spaa’s except elde 98
ground realistic
12.0 → 12.3
currently in a uptier with a 11.0 cas aircraft there is almost nothing you can do against such aa’s as if we look at the AMX where it stands at 11.0 in grb it only has laser gbus what cant do anything against such systems except the elde just because of the short range and ceiling it has.
GRB：
VT-5 11.0→11.3
Adding new BTA2 apfsds
VT-5’s apfsds got only 491mm penetration now. which is limited in high tier battle. if it need to go to 11.3 and meet high tier MBTs more often. It is necessary for it to got more reliable fire power.
M8 LAC Armored Car (Chinese and US) 1.0 → 2.0 or 2.3 Armor, mobility and the Cal. .50 on its own is like a 2nd main gun. The reload nerf could also be taken away then.
vehicle: t72 b3a
br 12.0 → 11.7
Reasoning: Why on earth is a T-72 with horrid mobility and a reload rate at 12.0? it gets outclassed by everything and can be penned by m829a2 from 500m away on its ufp. Not only is it not survivable, but it’s slow and hard to use. compared to all the leos that have better mobility, realod, rounds, spall liners, reverse rates better than walking pace, no citv for the commander, and way way way worse armour with huge weak gaps.
The Merkava 2D should have the M428 and should have better armor in the modular armor, just like the 3D and 4.
still waiting for type90 to 11.7 in GRB
if MSC and VT5 should go to 11.0/11.3
why type90 still there?
You don’t get it. It’s totally fair for this thing to go at the same BR as the T64b.
GRB
ZTZ59A 8.0 to 8.3
its better than the t54 and type59 in every way
try playing the tors and you will see how useless they are. even against lower br aircraft
Aircraft: F-104G (Italy)
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
BR change: 11.0 → 10.7
Reasoning: In comparison with German and Belgian counterparts they are identical, however the Italian carries 2 times less missiles but shares the same BR with them.
100% agreed.
The PZH 2000 is stupidly broken being the best anti air at its br and also capable of destroying any tank it faces and it doesn’t go up ?
Who is the one responsible for those changes ??
Vehicle: Yak9K
Mode: Ground RB
BR: 4.7 to 5.7
Reason: Do I even need to state the obvious? A 45mm APHE shell that will nuke ground targets from top down attack on a very good airframe that can dog fight very well. While in real life the gun can’t fire without ripping the plane apart. This BR uptier is long over due.
AIR RB CHANGES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-4C
Add AIM-7E Sparrow because this Phantom has no countermeasures and needs a marginally better weapon so it’s not complete missile bait. This is a historical armament the F-4C had.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-4F Early
BR Change: 10.7 → 10.3
This Phantom has no countermeasures and constantly has to face missiles. The worst things you could face right now are the JA-37C Viggen or MiG-23MLD both of which have superior radars, missiles, and flight models. There are quite a few aircraft at 9.3 that can handle an F-4F in a dogfight like the MiG-19, MiG-21F-13, even a Q-5 early could probably kill an F-4F in an energy trap.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-104S.ASA
BR Change: 12.0 → 11.7
This is a dead plane that desperately needs a lower BR. It is outclassed within its BR range even when downtiered.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MiG-29 (9-12A), MiG-29 (9-12B), MiG-29 (9-13)
BR Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Remove R-27ER. The early MiG-29’s struggle because they only get 2 radar missiles that are really good but you are set back once you have R-60M’s left. The R-27ER was originally a balancing choice when it was R-27R vs AIM-7M. Also this is a late variant R-27 missile on early MiG-29 variants which doesn’t make too much sense. This change would make the aircraft comparable to the F/A-18A or Mirage 2000C-S4 that are also at 12.3. These early MiG-29’s don’t really stand a chance against 13.7 aircraft decked out with ARH missiles and IR missiles with IRCCM.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MiG-29 Sniper
BR Change: 12.7 → 13.0
Add R-73 and R-27ET. This would be a logical choice since the aircraft is technically an upgraded version of previous models. This change would make this aircraft slightly better than the MiG-29G and would make it a much more appealing aircraft to buy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRB
type90
br 11.3→11.7
leclerc S1/S2
br 12.0→11.7
su22m3
more countermeasures like the su22um3k/su22m4 need to be added
i agree with the type 90 but from someone who has used both the leclercs they should stay at 12.0
(Air RB) Kurnass 2000 12.3>12.0 — plane has only IR rockets that dont have IRCCM, for example f4ej-kai on 12.3 it has aim 9L and aim 7 sparrow