Reason: Just. No.
Its armor is weak, its engine is weak, its firepower is mediocre for the BR, gun handling is med. Overall there’s just no justification for it going up to 9.7. Does it even have nice stats???
Edit:
Fair, it does have a 1.4 KD over the past month, but could yall PLEASE NORMALIZE that based on the stats of the players that played this tank? Like, look up the KD for the premium Leo2A4 in German TT (0.94KD) and French TT (1.47KD) over last month, we all know French mains are more “saturated” because there’s fewer new players grinding the whole tree with one single premium tank, it’s…I’m tired at this point.
Theres no Reason to the Merkava Mk2D and Sabra get up in BR even higher and i wont even talk abow the Ayit. will be so nice playing against the J7D BS. a Skyhawk playing vs Mig 23, J7D, F5C and others
Once again the Namar is being put up in BR how many times do you need to be told the spikes are dreadful for a top down attack munition it rarely seems to do top down attack usually opting for a track or the front plate or for the 2A7V especially likes to hit the fat turret cheeks. The 30mm it has just feels so weak and now that its going to face the 90M and BVM more its just depressing I mean what is russian era made of? Vibranium?
Can we pwetty pwease stop putting the Namar 30 up in BR
And for everyones sake FIX the Trophy APS
T29 is now gonna have the same reaload as T34? So 18KG 105mm round takes same time to load in turrent with more space then the T64 24Kg 120mm round in turret where larger gun was jammed…
Suggestion:
Add AIM-120B or C-5 missiles to the F-16C.
Reason:
With the AIM-120A already available on the F-16A ADF, there is little incentive to play the F-16C. The F-16A is a slightly better dogfighter and, although it lacks the HMD and 60 CM, this is not a major issue. The lack of a more advanced missile makes progressing to the F-16C less appealing, as it does not offer significant advantages over the ADF.
How come Turm III is still untouched in the BR changes? I understand it’s one of the best-selling premiums and Gaijin doesn’t want to hurt sales, but come on – this vehicle has been long overdue for a BR increase. It’s been sitting in a sweet spot for way too long
Mode: Air Sim
Vehicle: Ariete
BR: 9.0 to 9.7
It is at 9.3 in AB and RB, and there is no reason to keep it low in sim.
In sim, this aircraft should be even higher than 9.3 due to its extremely good kinematics, cockpit visibility, and quality of its guns with 1100m/s projectile velocity.
Kinematically, Ariete is comparable to 9.7 aircraft like MiG-19S, and not the 9.0 sim aircraft. It runs circles around 9.0 aircraft in sim easily. Ariete and MiG-19S have comparable basic equipment, making the kinematics comparison fair.
In sim, cockpit visibility is of great importance, and Ariete has a fantastic visibility, above average cockpit visibility.
Guns quality. 1100m/s projectile velocity is best in game, vastly above air cannons quality of anything below 10.0.
Reason: T-80UD has been quite broken for many patches, particularly the armor and…just about everything except for reverse speed, let’s be honest. Its stats are bad only because a lot of new players bought it, so idk.
I agree, the core issue is the compression and the BR reduction of most migs and sabres. I think CL-13B should be one of the first steps in decompressing, alongside Ayit which is happening in this change.
thats not entirely true because F-16C is a true multi-role fighter, yeah its A2G weapons aren’t really a factor in ARB but overall it’s still a good step up over the ADF. I 100% agree that the F-16C should get the AIM-120B or C-5 though
edit: we’re also forgetting F-16A has AIM-9L and not 9M so thats another A2A advantage F-16C has
