Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

…So what was your original point then? They’re both still easily killed by LFP and anywhere with ERA on any of the T-72s is a strong point. I can’t say I’ve ever been penned through my UFP without the ERA in that spot being destroyed. Meaning the TURMS-T is just a B with thermals.

I don’t get why the AM-1 is going up but the AMD-1 absolutely needs to go up.

Does it make any sense that M1A1 and IPM1 are at the same br?

1 Like

The AM-1 is clearly superior to the AMD-1 with its turret armour… the APS does not weigh up the difference.

1 Like

The A-5C is already sad enough at 10.7. No reason at all to move it up.

The T-72B glacis is vastly stronger than the AV on top of having a better engine and fwiw a stronger turret due to heavy NERA inserts

you have no idea what you’re talking about, the AV is nothing like a “B with thermals”.

2 Likes

Nah. The Ho-Ri makes up for it by being massively more mobile and having half the reload rate.

The Jagdtiger should go up. But can’t unless that entire bracket is decompressed. Jagdtiger is a sitting duck to many high pen guns it can meet.

1 Like

Make it go up i need something to hit with an ATGM and laugh the ass off lol

1 Like

What great armour?
the T55AMD-1 has the same turret as a T55 which is a modified T54 turret…
The hull while has the composite on it can be shot clean through by any of the 105mm APDS at 8.3 never mind 8.7

Its not good, its mediocre, not good or bad.

Completely ignoring the fact its got one of the worst rounds for the BR in its APFSDS, it may have APHE, and a missile but you shouldn’t be using either of those over an APFSDS.

As well as all of this, you’ve never even used the T55AM1 or AMD1.

Its a good 8.7, there are far better tanks at 8.7 than the T55AM1 and AMD1
hell even the object 435 is miles ahead of both of them.

the tank while good for 8.7 should not be forced to face off against 10.0s! have you ever fought a leopard 2K in a T55? it doesn’t work.
Youve got 125mm of angle pen which is about 100 less than most 10.0s have.

Most tanks dont have an APS period, there arent many in game as far as im aware, the BN, the VT4A1, the one on the megachs and the APS on the T55 and T80.
thats it.

The fact is, the T55 APS is still one of the worst in game, regardless of the BR.
If you see the thing pointing at you, and you fire an ATGM at it, that is a skill issue.

Its not though, its about the same and only 2kmph faster, hence the comparison to the chieftain.

You are completely ignoring.

  • better reload-
  • substantially better round
  • similar mobility.
  • better layout and survivability.
  • better ammo positioning
  • better crew positioning.

T-62 aint that good at all, the object 435 takes what is bad on the T62 and improves on it.
E.g roof MG, better profile, marginally better mobility.
and ofc the same gun and reload.

I have complained in the past about the compression of heavy tanks, actually had a full blown debate on a german thread about moving a lot of tanks up E.G tiger 2 shouldnt be the same BR as a sherman.
or the IS3/4 shouldnt see 6.3 / 7.

The T72A actually was something i was about to bring up, the fact of hte matter is, if the T55Am1 and AMD1 go to 9.0
the Merkavas to 9.7,
the shir 2 to 10.0
the T72A should go to 9.7 and the T64B up to 10.0.

Its not one vehicle, its two for a start.
Secondly it creates greater imbalance as these tanks will get clubbed. meaning the tanks in the Br bracket around it will seem better and move up due to the score they recieve not on how they perform overall.

2 Likes

The fact theyll be at 9.0 with a 125 angle pen dart is stupid af man xD isnt it

Nah, anything over the 105 mm dm 33 can easily pen the t72a UFP, for the t72b only things better than the M900 can actually go trough the UFP, the TURMS-S isnt just a B with thermals, it is just a t72AV with thermals.

mode : Ground realistic battles.

Vehicle : ZTZ99II / III

Change : 11.0 > 11.3

reasoning: they are incredibly strong tanks for their BR, armed with good composites and ERA. great turret protection, and reliable frontal mobility, as well as a laser warning system and decent dart.

1 Like

mode : Ground realistic battles.

Vehicle : MBT 2000

Change : 11.0 > 11.3

reasoning: extremely mobile platform with good optics, and decent protection as wella s a decent round

Doesn’t it have like half the reload?

Ho-Ri, especially production is in a pretty good spot rn

1 Like

Though they are extremely Patriotic :P

(Couldnt resist :P )

I don’t think he cares.

1 Like

But I need them to drop 2,000lb of democracy on a tiger, i mean, a annihlator tank

1 Like

Its like the mig25 stuff all over again, except it took years for the western intel to understand a foxbat, instead here just ask a handful of friends

Yeah i can see that man. Dudes just trolling at this point so bugger it

1 Like

The 38 n.A. was a dedicated scout vehicle, at rank 1 it is unable to scout.

2 Likes