Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised. Though if it goes to 12.7, they can just give it ASRAAM 😜
1 Like
cant agree more
Like why, at first you would need to change every EF not just the German one. What about the Rafal it’s at least as good as the EF If Not better. Of course the flight model of the EF and the Rafal are better then the ones of the F18 and Su30 but you only have 6 Radar missiles on the EF while you can take 12 on the Su 30or 10 on the F18.
amx-40 too :p
1 Like
I just don’t get why Gaijin hates strike aircraft when they can destroy a base for a reward, in that level of hatred… :/
Even Gary King(From the world’s end) or Baroness Maggy wasn’t this aggressive.
It might be completely unhistorical rubbish, and Bug reports will be spammed
But 50% of them will be rejected by ‘contains classified document’, and the other half will stay for years with another British bug report.
And Tabloids will enjoy showing the breaking news about this. :(
1 Like
France has no other 10.0 ground vehicles. You might as well remove it from the game then. It is fine at its 9.7 BR.
1 Like
It’s just like that sometimes, look at the M1 Abram’s at 10.7. You only have a line up with 10.3 and 10.0 tanks
When i stock grind the GR.4 its slower than phantoms ironically bc i need 5000 pounds of bomb a base while phantoms with 2 napalms barely needs a 2000 topped off with a full a2a kit
2 Likes
cuz its french
Please either remove airspawns all together, or stop pulling them from specific aircraft. The XP-50 was designed as an interceptor, and DESERVES to get an airspawn, same as the Fw-190s you’ve pulled the spawn from. Maybe don’t start them so far forward, sure, but completely removing them from cherry-picked aircraft is NOT the way to go about it.
Mode: Ground Realistic
Vehicle: T77E1
Change: Rank Change from II to III, Swap places with M19A1
Reasoning: The T77E1 is a much more potent Anti-Aircraft platform than the M19A1 and since its move to 4.0 It feels like it fits much better situated after the M19A1 in the tech tree at the start of rank III than it does at rank II.
You call me a genius and that would be correct in comparison to you.
You don’t understand. The KV-1E lacks a shell / gun capable of damaging a lot of things at 5.0, let alone 5.3
It’s a heavy tank. ITS SUPPOSED TO HAVE ARMOR.
It’s not a TD with a massive gun.
why change br of TKX P and Type 81 C from 11.3 to 11.7 when both are perfectly balanced at 11.3 while making a line up with premium Type 90 b Fuji. if TKX P moves to 11.7 despite our efforts against it then it should recieve a better APFSDS round because JM33 (DM33) is kinda hard for 11.3 already but JM33 at 11.7? a very bad idea
1 Like
I beg to differ. 2 mauses can cause alot of damage. And the comparison, of downtier v downtier
Maus v KV-1E many many more things can kill the Kv-1E over the Maus.
Unless you in a T92 or some time traveling Vietnam lighttank.
You wouldn’t angle in the ARL, you don’t need to.
Soviet 8.7 are bullying all of this unplayable stuff at stupid BRs like Leopard 1 M48 Char25 and another. Why? Because genius developer put it so high and now same developer want to make T-55 tanks usless like them too. So what they can do except making more and more boring barely playable tanks at unfair BRs? Maybe put all of this german and french and american and another stuff back to old BRs? Leopard 1 was at 7.3 and it wasnt even good just okay. M48 was okay at 7.0 for example. Maybe such changes can make game more fun without making T-55 equal to TAM or XM-803 or another stuff which are overperforming to ancient soviet tank and without making them free kill courier like Leopard 1 before?
Mode: Ground Realistic
FV4030/3 9.7 → 9.7
Why it should be left at 9.7, point by point:
- No NVD
- No ESS
- Slightly worse hull
- Possibility to assemble a setup
- It will not become competitive against MBT 11.0
When BR increases, give it TPV to compensate for the BR increase.
2 Likes
T95E1
RB
8.3 → 8.0
This vehicle is symptom of BR compression. Compared to contemporaries at 8.3, it is worse in just about every way. Against the M60A1 AOS, it is at a disadvantage in every regard except that its APFSDS has more flat penetration than the M60’s APDS. The lack of a stabilizer especially makes it very difficult to play, even with decent traverse rates and frontal protection. Compared to a tank like the Type 69, its only advantage is once again its armor penetration, which can be negated by the Type 69’s access to HEAT-FS, while the Type 69 is also much more responsive due to its excellent fire-controls, posessing not only a two axis stabilizer where the T95E1 lacks one, but also a laser rangefinder.
5 Likes
No, we should get away from that, not continue to do it. This mentality of “lets ruin one for the sake others” is a cancer people need to get over. Because its proven to be anything but just one. It is perfectly fine at 9.7. Has been. And will continue to be as it does not need this nerf. It has no because facing 11.0 tanks.
1 Like