cuz its french
Please either remove airspawns all together, or stop pulling them from specific aircraft. The XP-50 was designed as an interceptor, and DESERVES to get an airspawn, same as the Fw-190s you’ve pulled the spawn from. Maybe don’t start them so far forward, sure, but completely removing them from cherry-picked aircraft is NOT the way to go about it.
Mode: Ground Realistic
Vehicle: T77E1
Change: Rank Change from II to III, Swap places with M19A1
Reasoning: The T77E1 is a much more potent Anti-Aircraft platform than the M19A1 and since its move to 4.0 It feels like it fits much better situated after the M19A1 in the tech tree at the start of rank III than it does at rank II.
You call me a genius and that would be correct in comparison to you.
You don’t understand. The KV-1E lacks a shell / gun capable of damaging a lot of things at 5.0, let alone 5.3
It’s a heavy tank. ITS SUPPOSED TO HAVE ARMOR.
It’s not a TD with a massive gun.
why change br of TKX P and Type 81 C from 11.3 to 11.7 when both are perfectly balanced at 11.3 while making a line up with premium Type 90 b Fuji. if TKX P moves to 11.7 despite our efforts against it then it should recieve a better APFSDS round because JM33 (DM33) is kinda hard for 11.3 already but JM33 at 11.7? a very bad idea
1 Like
I beg to differ. 2 mauses can cause alot of damage. And the comparison, of downtier v downtier
Maus v KV-1E many many more things can kill the Kv-1E over the Maus.
Unless you in a T92 or some time traveling Vietnam lighttank.
You wouldn’t angle in the ARL, you don’t need to.
Soviet 8.7 are bullying all of this unplayable stuff at stupid BRs like Leopard 1 M48 Char25 and another. Why? Because genius developer put it so high and now same developer want to make T-55 tanks usless like them too. So what they can do except making more and more boring barely playable tanks at unfair BRs? Maybe put all of this german and french and american and another stuff back to old BRs? Leopard 1 was at 7.3 and it wasnt even good just okay. M48 was okay at 7.0 for example. Maybe such changes can make game more fun without making T-55 equal to TAM or XM-803 or another stuff which are overperforming to ancient soviet tank and without making them free kill courier like Leopard 1 before?
Mode: Ground Realistic
FV4030/3 9.7 → 9.7
Why it should be left at 9.7, point by point:
- No NVD
- No ESS
- Slightly worse hull
- Possibility to assemble a setup
- It will not become competitive against MBT 11.0
When BR increases, give it TPV to compensate for the BR increase.
2 Likes
T95E1
RB
8.3 → 8.0
This vehicle is symptom of BR compression. Compared to contemporaries at 8.3, it is worse in just about every way. Against the M60A1 AOS, it is at a disadvantage in every regard except that its APFSDS has more flat penetration than the M60’s APDS. The lack of a stabilizer especially makes it very difficult to play, even with decent traverse rates and frontal protection. Compared to a tank like the Type 69, its only advantage is once again its armor penetration, which can be negated by the Type 69’s access to HEAT-FS, while the Type 69 is also much more responsive due to its excellent fire-controls, posessing not only a two axis stabilizer where the T95E1 lacks one, but also a laser rangefinder.
5 Likes
No, we should get away from that, not continue to do it. This mentality of “lets ruin one for the sake others” is a cancer people need to get over. Because its proven to be anything but just one. It is perfectly fine at 9.7. Has been. And will continue to be as it does not need this nerf. It has no because facing 11.0 tanks.
1 Like
T28
RB
6.3 → 6.7
This vehicle should not be facing 5.3 tanks, which it is practically invulnerable to. Even though it has weaker side armor compared to the T95, frontally it is still a 7.0 vehicle. It still has incredible firepower for its battle rating while being frontally impervious to all but the strongest guns, especially at range. The reduced side armor is a downgrade, but it only requires more careful playstyle/planning rather than compromising the entire vehicle.
1 Like
At this point i want a refund on the merkava mk2d as it is already weak at 9.7 it’s slow it’s big and it’s barely survivable 10.0 makes absolutely no sense for this thing. Meanwhile the t64b with a better gun, a better round, better armour, and better mobility is at 9.7 how does that make sense. What a scam company
1 Like
Marder III
RB
2.3 → 2.7
The level of firepower it possesses is unreasonable for 2.3, compared to a contemporary like the ZiS-30 it is superior in all but reload rate and some degree in mobility. It is comparable to the Marder III H and could arguably be the same BR at 3.0.
1 Like
The Syrians got the upgrade to the Turms-T sight in 1998 at the earliest, which means the 3BM42, which entered Soviet service in 1986 was not “modern at time”, in addition the Upgrade gave the Turms the Ability to use the 9M119 ATGM.
Concerning your rumors about them being to long:
on this page there is a picture showing off ammo captured by I**S in 2016
This one to be precise which shows 3BM32 and 3BM42. IF the Syrians had nothing to shoot it with why would they have bought it?
T-34-85 (D-5T)
RB
5.3 → 5.7
Due to its use of volumetric armor, the turret armor is actually stronger frontally compared to the standard T-34-85. The firepower performance is the same, and the only real disadvantage is the lack of a 5th crew member. They should be the same BR, as they perform more or less the same when at full performance, only lacking slightly in survivability.
3 Likes
Crusader AA Mk. II
RB
3.7 → 2.7
The firepower is equal to the AEC AA Mk. II, with the only advantage in total ammunition count, not even belt sizes. Their BRs could be different, but they should not be so far apart.
Ka-Chi
RB
2.0 → 2.3
The Ka-Chi has very strong frontal armor, much stronger than the Chi-Ha Kai even. The large size makes it rather cumbersome to use, but it also means that, with its large crew count, makes it very survivable, especially against low-rank opponents. Right now it seal-clubs most 1.0-2.0 vehicles due to its good protection and survivability, while its firepower and mobility are adequate for the tier.
3 Likes
Air AB, French F-100D. 9.7 > 9.3 : like the american one which is better thanks to its Aim9E and is 9.3 since years!
Sidenote : same situation for the chinese F-100A.
1 Like