Use HE
2 Likes
You forgot the most important part, it was moved down to 9.7 a few days after it went to 10.0
Mode: Air Realistic
Vehicle: F4F-Early (germany)
BR Change: 10,7 → 10,0
Reasoning: Its the only flaresless plane that sits so high. It constantly faces planes with all aspect IR missiles. It only has rear aspect 18G IR missiles to defend itself. It even has to face potent radar missiles which it cant defend without chaff.
1 Like
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: J7W1
6.0 > 5.3 + Air spawn (5.0 if it still struggles)
This plane doesn’t perform well to the other aircraft at its BR, let alone those above it. While the guns can vaporize aircraft if all goes well, they have been known to be inconsistent. Not to mention, it’s climb rate is quite lackluster, which is odd, given the power output of the engine. I would suggest lowering it to 5.3 and re-classing it as an interceptor, its intended role. However, if it still has a rough time at 5.3, it could go down to 5.0.
3 Likes
in SB?
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: AMX A1A (Brazil)
Change: 11.0→ 10.7
Reasoning: The MAA-1 missiles are better in terms of G pull but other than that they are worse in every other way compared to the AIM-9L and the DEFA cannons are also objectively worse than the Vulcan, Yet this is still placed higher than the tech tree counterpart.
7 Likes
The swiss Hunter should get its correct cockpit first before it moves up in Sim.
GRB
(Yes, its an sentence)
Currently, the only place where its 10.0 is ARB
This round of BR changes are actually pretty decent.
Shir and Sabra finally got what they deserved and move up to 10.0,
Merkavas being the best 9.3s are now going to 9.7 which is also great.
Ah, different gamemode though, this is just for SB
No, just grind the tech trees normally instead of asking the snail lol
No 50.cal
Ground Realistic: Strv 103C
9.0 → 8.7
Considering the extremely limited ability of the vehicle not being stabilized, and being comparable to the already present SK-105A2 / JaPz.K A2 — being kinda more hard to kill but lacking a turret, thermal, and the light tank mechanic, while sharing the same firepower (fire rate and weak spot penetration potential) — it should probably even be lowered in BR. But I will not force it and simply accept it stays the same BR. However, I understand no one plays it, so it will increase in BR because no one cares about the Strv 103. plz like if you support this change
32 Likes
It needs to be done, but when compared to say the Hunter FGA9 also at 9.7 with no RWR, No CMs and only Aim-9Es. The fact they are at the same BR is rather stupid
RB
Object 279
9.0 > 9.3
if all t55 get +0.3br then 279 should too since it has everything better…
4 Likes
Ground realistic
FV107 Scimitar (Britain)
7.7–> 7.3
It’s not a very fast light tank, the gun isn’t stabilised, and with the recent changes the turret traverse is very slow too. it has next to no survivability, as unlike the fox it is not .50 cal proof frontally, and the 30mm gun has a very low fire rate for an autocannon
10 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Me 262 A-1
Change: 7.0 → 6.7
Reasoning:
The Me 262 is severely underpowered compared to almost all other 7.0 aircraft. It climbs worse, accelerates worse, often has worse top speed, it’s guns are all but unusable against jets, and it nearly always turns worse compared to every aircraft it faces, both at 7.0, it’s own tier, and especially in any level of uptier. As it is, it is a slightly buffed He 162 sitting a full BR higher, and people tend to consider the He 162 fairly tedious to fly as it is. It is also a mostly unavoidable part of the German tech tree, as all the way from 7.0-8.0 your options are mainly Me 262 variants, which all suffer against their respective opponents. Even the Jabo variant, which gets an airspawn, is still underpowered. With respect to this, the Me 262 A-1 should be moved to 6.7, where it will hopefully both fight a higher quantity of superprops and, naturally, avoid uptiers to 8.0.
12 Likes
Is-2 (All models) deserve a .3 reduction in BR.
The ones at 6.7 are inferior to the American and German heavy tanks they share a BR with, The Is-2 has worse protection than most of them, A painfully long reload and below average mobility, Their only real strength is angle pen and HE filler but that’s not enough to justify being 6.7 with how the Tiger 2H and T34 out class it.
Even the T-44-122 is better than the Is-2 1944 because it at least has good mobility to get out of danger when reloading.
The BR-471D on the 1944 models is also not an upside over the base model, That shell only has 25mm of extra flat pen while having slightly worse high angle pen and worse HE filler than BR-471B, And as i recall, That shell was removed from the 1944 models in the past because they never had it, But it was re-added to justify moving it up? That +25mm of flat pen barely matters when the majority of tanks at that BR range don’t have flat armor, If it needs to be removed to justify lowering the Is-2’s then remove it.
10 Likes
I find funny that the JaPz. K A2 and the SK-105A2 has way better gun handling, ammo, has good thernal imager quality and laser rangefinder (in a oscillating turret which is pretty uncommon).
Leopard 2A7V
Ground Realistic Battle
12.0–>12.3
fix its armor hole and give it its realistic D-tech armor, it is currently better than many 12.0 MBT, so it should be at least 0.3 br higher than 12.0 while also use this opportunity to fix its armor
2 Likes