More compression in GRB…yay!
And look who dodges the bullet again, 2S38!
So, what? It’s still weak even if you give it M833. So don’t bring the overused(mobility and reload).
Where Swiss Hunter?
I could chuck it in there, but being 10.0 its fine relatively speaking
Top tier Air RB decompression:
Su-30SM: 14.0 → 14.3
2 Likes
Top tier Air RB decompression:
Rafale C: 14.0 → 14.3
2 Likes
Dont forget the PT-76-57 and begleitpanzer
Top tier Air RB decompression:
Eurofighter (all): 14.0 → 14.3
4 Likes
In SB? says 9.7 to me
Top tier Air RB decompression:
F-15E/I: 14.0 → 14.3
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Aircraft (Helicopters): KA-50
Change: 11.3 → 11.7
Reasoning: The KA-50 is tier-by-tier the most toxic and overpowered helicopter to date. At it’s own BR there is literally only a single SPAA that is capable of reliably fighting it (Tor M1), any other SPAA at it’s br or below has absolutely no chance at dealing with it, even if the KA-50 player barely pays attention, as most SAM’s at the BR or below do not have the necessary range-performance, nor the velocity to take it down. Gun, or IR-based SPAA do not stand a chance, as they either: do not have enough range, or cannot lock-onto it at ~2.5km. Even at 11.7, there’d only be few, but atleast some, SPAA that can deal with it.
At the same time, the KA-50 has an absurdly high kill potential with minimal risk and is hilariously easy to spawn in. Heli-rushers inting early, therefore possibly dragging down it’s overall stats is absolutely no justification for it to stay at such a low BR.
1 Like
No clue why the FGA9 is 9.3 in realistic where the F.6 is 9,7
In truth it should be given its 6 Aim9L-I it had IRL, Id need to find the source again but its out there. unclassified. it might even have had 8 since it had a double mount on the wings like F18 has.
1 Like
Thought it went up last BR change
Ground RB, M26. 6.7 > 6.3
I propose a revert to the M26’s former BR of 6.3
-
It is directly outclassed by other US vehicles at 6.7, such as T26E5 and T26E1-1. These are more heavily armored and/or better armed variants of the M26. They are obviously different and shouldn’t share a BR.
-
It is comparable with tanks such as Panther A and Tiger 1E, which sit at a BR of 6.0, a whopping two BR steps lower. The tanks are roughly comparable in Armor and firepower, but I will concede the M26 is slightly better than either. That’s why I advocate for 6.3 BR, a difference of 0.3 from these vehicles.
8 Likes
Doesn’t rectify its still a starfighter at 12.0 lol, I think it would be fine staying as it currently is with a severe BR decrease
1 Like
SRAAMs were good, and should be a LOT stronger than they are currently. It makes sense if they ever fix SRAAMs
No wonder Gaijin doesn’t listen to most of these posts when users think 2S38 is stupidly survivable.
2 Likes
A vehicle that isn’t even in game yet?
Also no, the SEPv2 is not in line with the 2A7V.
Air:
AB: 9.3
RB: 10.0
SB 9.7
Ground:
AB: -
RB: 9.7
SB: 9.7