Planned Battle Rating changes for April 2025

Mode: Simulator

Vehicle: all 12.3, 13.3, 13.7

BR Change: none, but rearranging of rotations

Reasoning:
The BR’s mentioned above are never at the top in a rotation, and thus always face more potent vehicles exclusively. Especially 13.3 is always facing 14.0, which is a very steep step.

Now:
image

Possible rearrangement:
image

(Other setups with overlapping ranges also possible)

30 Likes

AMX-40 + Vextra 105
10.0 + 9.7 → 10.3
Why: Vextra 105 still missing OFL 105 F2, and now lacks a lineup with AMX-40’s increase
AMX-40 is still missing armor, proper ammo performance, and proper Gen 2 Thermals. This would back up the Leo 2NL and Super Etendard in a slight uptier, or make the Jaguar A and Tiger HAP more useful, as well as bring the vehicles up-to-par with reality whilst not making them overpowered

45 Likes

and the HAC (fake helicopter which was actually a UHT but reskinned and added to france) is still at 12.0

4 Likes

Yeah but so you are still loosing your 6.7 lineup, you can hope to go downtier even if it’s low

1 Like

Naval RB, type T-38, BR 1.7→1.0, This is as same cannon and armor as type T-14(mod.2) reserve boat. Is there enough difference between these boats to change the BR? (same reason of ab)

1 Like

Genuinely confused why are the Q-5A and L going up in ARB? Very limited amount of CM’s, barely supersonic and poor turning since they are attackers. Also no missiles and limited to dumb bombs , rockets, and LGB’s for the L which shouldn’t push it up in air BR.

20 Likes

from what i remember it’s one vehicle per suggestion but yeah i wanted a vextra one

I mean my 6.7 lineup is amx 13. Amx 13 ss11 and amx m4 so doesn’t matter XD

why you move Q-5 up gaijin?they are just worse mig19 and no reason to 10.0

11 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Vehicle: Typhoon FGR.4(Great Britain)
BR Change: 14.0 > 14.3/14.7

Reasoning:
If we take planes at 14.0 such as F-15E/15I, Su-30SM, F-18C, F/A-18C Late as a prime examples of 14.0 aricraft, then in comparison with them Typhoon FGR.4 is arguably way better and should be raised in BR compared to them.

15 Likes

But the fact that its higher than a tiger ii H is still dissapointing

1 Like

Gaijin, its long overdue increasing the Maximum BR in naval to 7.3, so instead of moving ships down in BR, increase the maximum BR

8 Likes

mode: realistic mixed battles

vehicle: panzer IV C/E/F1, sdkfz 234/3 and nb.fz removal of the (busted) heat round (hl.gr38 b and c)

reasoning: it’s a 3.3sec overpressuring round capable of killing t34s from the front and shouldn’t be available for vehicles before 3.0. In short it’s blantantly op.

Did both because AMX-40 is already increasing

NVDs are added to new vehicles when they are in the 10.0 range where night battles take place.

4 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Vehicle: Rafale C F3
BR Change: 14.0 > 14.3/14.7

Reasoning:
If we take planes at 14.0 such as F-15E/15I, Su-30SM, F-18C, F/A-18C Late as a prime examples of 14.0 aricraft, then in comparison with them Rafale C F3 is arguably way better and should be raised in BR compared to them.

26 Likes

great excuses to yeet the fox there then.

2 Likes

We need decompression, mostly around 8.0~9.0 and 13.0~14.0
The current BR compression is total mess

9 Likes

The HMS glorious used to be 5.7 but moved up because it was stomping on cruisers and destroyers, now it’s going back down?

It’s frankly ridiculous how the first Gen dreadnoughts and battlecruisers got moved to 5.7 and 6.0 where they can see teams of destroyers, they need to go up, not down

1 Like

KA-50
11.3 → 11.7

It outranges every spaa if downtiered and still does most at its own br.
the APDS belt on all helicopters with the russian 30mm need SP cost for the belt it should not be able to first spawn with that specially at that BR.
the KA50 should sit much more closely to the KA52 in BR,Just because it lacks thermals doesnt mean it should be able to terrorize 10.0 tanks with 7km max range SAMs.

29 Likes