mode: realistic mixed battles
vehicle: panzer IV C/E/F1, sdkfz 234/3 and nb.fz removal of the (busted) heat round (hl.gr38 b and c)
reasoning: it’s a 3.3sec overpressuring round capable of killing t34s from the front and shouldn’t be available for vehicles before 3.0. In short it’s blantantly op.
Did both because AMX-40 is already increasing
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
NVDs are added to new vehicles when they are in the 10.0 range where night battles take place.
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Rafale C F3
BR Change: 14.0 > 14.3/14.7
Reasoning:
If we take planes at 14.0 such as F-15E/15I, Su-30SM, F-18C, F/A-18C Late as a prime examples of 14.0 aricraft, then in comparison with them Rafale C F3 is arguably way better and should be raised in BR compared to them.
great excuses to yeet the fox there then.
We need decompression, mostly around 8.0~9.0 and 13.0~14.0
The current BR compression is total mess
The HMS glorious used to be 5.7 but moved up because it was stomping on cruisers and destroyers, now it’s going back down?
It’s frankly ridiculous how the first Gen dreadnoughts and battlecruisers got moved to 5.7 and 6.0 where they can see teams of destroyers, they need to go up, not down
KA-50
11.3 → 11.7
It outranges every spaa if downtiered and still does most at its own br.
the APDS belt on all helicopters with the russian 30mm need SP cost for the belt it should not be able to first spawn with that specially at that BR.
the KA50 should sit much more closely to the KA52 in BR,Just because it lacks thermals doesnt mean it should be able to terrorize 10.0 tanks with 7km max range SAMs.
GRB
Su-22UM3K (as well as other Su-22M3s)
10.3 > 10.0
Reasoning:
It has no TGP (basic gunsight used to aim laser weapons) and has a bad Flight Model coupled with an RWR that cannot even detect rolands.
Yeah but i mean they will ignore the suggestion if you suggest two different vehicles, if those were like same exact tank but just in different tech tree it’s fine.
except if i’m not understanding well what you suggested in your comment.
Mode: Air Realistic
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-R1
Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reasoning: It’s worse than the Mirage 2000C-S4/5 while being at the same BR. Lacking the Super 530D’s that the S4/5 get whilst also being worse in performance and relying on a gunpod which also tanks it’s performance.
@Grantaire Does not seems bad ‘if’ Gaijin lowers overall destroyers and cruisers BR downward.
For Marne, well she’s having firepower of 3.3 destroyer and having coastal spawn so even 3.3 could be low BR for her.
GRB,
BO 105 PAH-1
9.3 > 9.0.
Reasoning:
It is nearly an Copy of the other BO, but has worse missiles, lowering it to 9.0 would also allow it to be used in the 9.0 lineup, hopefully this way this BO would be played more as currently there is not an single reason to play it over the other BO
Is it me or is anything naval or below tier VI just getting the Windows 7 support treatment now??
XF5F → Aierial respawn has been removed.
That is a spelling error. It should be “aerial respawn.”
Last time I checked, the XF5F doesn’t have airspawn.
EDIT: it changed to XP-50 in Excel, so I don’t really care. Will definitely revisit to see how it is doing at 4.0 by the time the BR changes are implemented.
ARB
F-4F Late
11.0 → 11.3 + Aim-9L
Currently the F-4F performs realy good at 11.0, maybe even a bit to good with 9L’s it could be eazyly pushed to 11.3 if not even 11.7
VT5 with 9.7 apfsds in 12.0 (thx for 90+% fulluptier) lmao complete joke… fix the br system and the matchmaking first before change the pointless brs
RB
PzH 2000/ PzH 2000HU
7.7 → 8.0
Fix the Issues on it(mainly Spall-Liner for the BR) and move it to atleast 8.0, good mobility, VERY good firerate
Edit: forgot to mention that the PzH 2000HU is a bit more than 2 tons lighter than the german one so it has better mobility while also having the Camo net
HAC missing appears to be a typo. Devs are investigating.