Hmm I beg to differ with the breech shot doing nothing.
A 40mm anti air gun literally broke my breech and killed my gunner.
the Mk.10 is left without a lineup, and if the Mk.11 was added separately there would be 0 reason to bring the 10 over the 11 after it is researched. as they would play the exact same but one would be less capable, much like the Mark 3 and 5 Chieftains,
Shvaks over preforming??? What planet are you on now? 😂 the things you people come up with.
And acting like the me-163 isn’t just as good lol okay… ones a tech tree, ones a super rare event vehicle.
Once the skill issue is said, your argument is null and void bud. I clearly know how to use the vehicles, but in my experience you only have about 45 secs worth of fuel left at best when reaching the battlefield in air rb.
I do find it find it hilarious you think it’s so OP, I’ve downed a few of them over the years in far less competent aircraft, and they were good players too.
Mythical armor that falls apart moment it’s shot at by APDS or a dart. I seriously doubt it will do good at 9.0.
Wait i thought all t55 goes up well thats sucks and makes no sanse
Also 16hp/pt is very nice when u have armor too and the apfsds is pretty good
If u dont like it u have heat or great aphe
It was too strong against 7.7
Have you ever played it? It’s terrible, not to mention you’re outloaded by everyone, and you have no thermals.
lol I still find it funny that there is no comments with evidence shvaks are better.
Out of all the belts, the stealth rounds are the only HE I believe but it goes AP, HE, AP.
(Your lead comment is kinda pointless, I know how to lead, trying to see a stealth belt is difficult though no?)
Lastly, I hate air rb, they should removed the red marks above peoples head then it would be a good game mode, I prefer sim.
In sim the Bi likes to flat spin fairly easily.
Ah yes, totally, I’m biased, im talking about vehicles I have experience with ones you seemingly don’t, and half the forums always try to get Russian vehicles nerfed because people cannot aim, or can not play well, so it’s automatically assumed “Russian bias is real.” Y’all are goood pranksters, joking about.
Only nonsensical move would be to move T-55A up to 8.7 lol.
No, having 20 HP/t is nice, having 16 is just okay.
Dart is far from pretty good, it’s one of the worst in the game. As I said, it’s basically worse than DM13 APDS fired from L7 cannon. Calling that pretty good at 8.7 or 9.0 is asinine.
ab and RB ground forces
if the AMX-13 and AM M4 is going 7.0
then it means that :
- PANTHER D → 6.0
- TIGER H1, TIGE E → 6.7
- Sd.Kfz.234/2 → 5.0
- PzH 2000 → 8.3
- Gepard -->8.7
its only fair to move germany up, if they forces france up due to germany poor player performances causing the stats of france being better than germany
6 Likes
They’re good in WT, but they kinda sucked IRL.
They’re good at 8.0, but for some reason gaijin put the one with 20mms and the Ki-200 at 8.7. There also isn’t an event Me-163. Even if we assume they are equal planes, why is the Me-163 1.3-2.0 BRs higher than the BI?
If you’re saying the BI is balanced, you are biased and/or do not know what you are talking about.
Good luck killing one in a prop plane, because you just won’t. You also won’t be able to in an early jet either.
I have not seen much evidence to suggest otherwise.
Have you ever considered that the vehicles are OP in some way?
I genuinely can’t imagine defending the BI unless I was biased towards it.
3 Likes
what is bro on
2 Likes
nvm he onto smth
1 Like
simple, due to players that cant utilize tiger, its at a lower BR,
the panther is trolly due to volumetric issue in this game,
and puma is beyond due for a UP becaus of how OP that rat is that low of a br
1 Like
i agree 10.7 is a bit to high however 10.3 will do fin until we get a br increase and move anything above. bc the F-4F i still a better Phantom than the F-4C even though it lacks the Radar missiles.
these days its a lot better balanced, its not quite as good as the Chaffee IMO, it used to be 2.7 and it was horribly strong there
1 Like
Nevermind you lost me again. Bro what are you on about??
The tiger1s are an easy pen angled by any m82 shell at 6.7, that’s a death sentence. there’s practically no way to defend themselves at 6.7 against american 90mms using a short 88mm. that’s just stupid
the panther d could use an uptier to 5.7 because having a slow turret is not an excuse to being 0.7 BRs below the other panthers. but that’s about it.
and seriously, puma for 5.0? have you lost your mind? the only thing its got to it is speed, and honestly if you die to a puma and think it should be fair to put it at 5.0, that’s a massive skill issue there. 100mm pen at 5.0 in a light tank is stupid and you should feel stupid for suggesting that too.
3 Likes
Are you comparing a radar missile with an inertial guidance system, protection from dipole reflectors, more maneuverable (P24P) with a missile that runs away from any dipole reflector (countermeasure) even when the Mirage’s radar is not shot down (530F)? In order to compare them, find out their features and the meaning of the postscript in the missile characteristics - Front-acpect - shoot down. In particular, how it works in the game. By comparing them, you showed your knowledge base on radar missiles. Moreover, some of those who encounter MLD do not see launches of radar missiles at themselves - shall we forget about this or is it something else? The R-60M will not work at 400 meters, at most from 700+ - I managed to shoot them down - personally. If you have problems with them - this does not mean that everyone has them. This is an average quality missile in all respects. I’ll note that I didn’t say that the P60M is equivalent to Magic2, but it’s not quantitatively clear if you know how to use it. The examples of aircraft you gave meet MLD, and all your arguments can be projected onto MLD and the result is the same, even worse because there are radar missiles that can shoot down long before the collision. Don’t forget about the RWR, which is much better and gives quite accurate data on enemies, which allows you to play better in defense. Comparing the Bison and the 2000Mirage (4/5) - with better FM, radars, combined weapons - is abnormal. The Bison - has only a worse maximum speed, but 1 on 1 will win. If we take 16 on 16, then the Mirage is played exclusively from defense and the moment when the enemy has not noticed you, while the MLD - can play both aggressively and passively. As for the wing sweep, in the game if it comes to this, you can set it up and manually control the sweep, thereby both maintaining the speed in the range you need and surprising opponents in one turn. All this number of countermeasures on the Mirage 144+48 helps only from infrared missiles and not all of them… And against radar and AMRAAM only the height helps and not all of them. If the number of countermeasures is a balanced norm, then the Taiwanese F16 with 45 countermeasures at 13.7 and without a helmet-mounted radar missile guidance system is at the level of the F16C. For some reason, they did not take this into account here as a balanced value. By the way, 72 counters to the MLD are enough for its combat rating.‘’ Being slow usually means you get 3rd partied and for the late game all it takes is the MLD being caught side or rear aspect within roughly 1.4km to get smacked by a Magic 2’’ - you can also catch a mirage, basically anyone who is not looking around. This is an empty take.
You got to be kidding me right? Tiger E are not equal to Tiger 2 or T34 lmao
4 Likes
try telling that to the AMX13 , AMX M4, EBR varients, SA 50, m4a1 FL10, AMX 13 FL11, and so many other french tanks,
because funnily enough, you defend germany that way, but that exact probleme is whats going on with france, and it seeems the hate to france is randome and trendy
2 Likes
Not to be offensive or anything but nobody is reading all of that, consider writing less because the only way I or other people will read all of this is if we’re legit getting paid lol.
Ja, please hilfen becoz me 262 nicht know what das MiG ist.
1 Like