Game mode: ground realistic
vehicles 9040B 9040C and other wth that cannon, it sould reload he gun while using wit 3 rounds in a bracket one bracket at a time at a time. PLEASE ADD single shot/3 shot modes to CV9040’s so its easier to not panic fire your ammo rack empty
Where did you see that T-55A goes to 8.7 ?
16 HP/t and 50km/h top speed isn’t really great mobility for 8.3 nor 8.7.
Dart is also pretty trash as it’s a copy of their APDS round. DM13 fired from L7 gun is literally better than that thing.
Mode: Naval Realistic
Vehicle: Scharnhorst
Change: 7.0 → 8.0
Reasoning: Scharnhorst is genuinely head and shoulders above any other ship in the game, it requires focus fire from an entire team to have the hope of taking it out.
Scharnhorst is absurdly powerful and can solo-carry a match. It should not be at a BR it is obviously overwhelming superior to supposed peers.
Naval is horribly compressed, with 6.7 being significantly worse than 7.0 ships. They should not ever have to fight something as monstrous as the Scharnhorst.
Just realized that AM-1 is going up to 2 BR steps over the T-55A for having… better armor and a laser rangefinder.
Chieftain Mk.10
GRB
9.0 → 9.3
Changes: Convert to Mk.11, (Add Thermals), Change shell to L23A1,
Reason: Currently it is the Trees only 9.0 tank, conversion to the Mark 11 standard would bring it up to par with 9.3s and give it a lineup where it fits as an equal, not as an inferior vehicle, it would be a welcome jump in capability and give us the ultimate variant of the Chieftain in game, while in addition the L23A1 shell will be a nice jump in abilities for uptiers, and help deal with opponents there, (aswell as addressing the concern that Standard L23 shell may be fake)
Or just add the Cheiftain Mk.11 and keep the Mk.10. No reason to remove vehicles.
Hmm I beg to differ with the breech shot doing nothing.
A 40mm anti air gun literally broke my breech and killed my gunner.
the Mk.10 is left without a lineup, and if the Mk.11 was added separately there would be 0 reason to bring the 10 over the 11 after it is researched. as they would play the exact same but one would be less capable, much like the Mark 3 and 5 Chieftains,
Shvaks over preforming??? What planet are you on now? 😂 the things you people come up with.
And acting like the me-163 isn’t just as good lol okay… ones a tech tree, ones a super rare event vehicle.
Once the skill issue is said, your argument is null and void bud. I clearly know how to use the vehicles, but in my experience you only have about 45 secs worth of fuel left at best when reaching the battlefield in air rb.
I do find it find it hilarious you think it’s so OP, I’ve downed a few of them over the years in far less competent aircraft, and they were good players too.
Mythical armor that falls apart moment it’s shot at by APDS or a dart. I seriously doubt it will do good at 9.0.
Wait i thought all t55 goes up well thats sucks and makes no sanse
Also 16hp/pt is very nice when u have armor too and the apfsds is pretty good
If u dont like it u have heat or great aphe
It was too strong against 7.7
Have you ever played it? It’s terrible, not to mention you’re outloaded by everyone, and you have no thermals.
lol I still find it funny that there is no comments with evidence shvaks are better.
Out of all the belts, the stealth rounds are the only HE I believe but it goes AP, HE, AP.
(Your lead comment is kinda pointless, I know how to lead, trying to see a stealth belt is difficult though no?)
Lastly, I hate air rb, they should removed the red marks above peoples head then it would be a good game mode, I prefer sim.
In sim the Bi likes to flat spin fairly easily.
Ah yes, totally, I’m biased, im talking about vehicles I have experience with ones you seemingly don’t, and half the forums always try to get Russian vehicles nerfed because people cannot aim, or can not play well, so it’s automatically assumed “Russian bias is real.” Y’all are goood pranksters, joking about.
Only nonsensical move would be to move T-55A up to 8.7 lol.
No, having 20 HP/t is nice, having 16 is just okay.
Dart is far from pretty good, it’s one of the worst in the game. As I said, it’s basically worse than DM13 APDS fired from L7 cannon. Calling that pretty good at 8.7 or 9.0 is asinine.
ab and RB ground forces
if the AMX-13 and AM M4 is going 7.0
then it means that :
- PANTHER D → 6.0
- TIGER H1, TIGE E → 6.7
- Sd.Kfz.234/2 → 5.0
- PzH 2000 → 8.3
- Gepard -->8.7
its only fair to move germany up, if they forces france up due to germany poor player performances causing the stats of france being better than germany
They’re good in WT, but they kinda sucked IRL.
They’re good at 8.0, but for some reason gaijin put the one with 20mms and the Ki-200 at 8.7. There also isn’t an event Me-163. Even if we assume they are equal planes, why is the Me-163 1.3-2.0 BRs higher than the BI?
If you’re saying the BI is balanced, you are biased and/or do not know what you are talking about.
Good luck killing one in a prop plane, because you just won’t. You also won’t be able to in an early jet either.
I have not seen much evidence to suggest otherwise.
Have you ever considered that the vehicles are OP in some way?
I genuinely can’t imagine defending the BI unless I was biased towards it.
what is bro on
nvm he onto smth
simple, due to players that cant utilize tiger, its at a lower BR,
the panther is trolly due to volumetric issue in this game,
and puma is beyond due for a UP becaus of how OP that rat is that low of a br
i agree 10.7 is a bit to high however 10.3 will do fin until we get a br increase and move anything above. bc the F-4F i still a better Phantom than the F-4C even though it lacks the Radar missiles.
these days its a lot better balanced, its not quite as good as the Chaffee IMO, it used to be 2.7 and it was horribly strong there