Basically the same main gun as on the M24 Chaffee, same shells, same penetration.
Meanwhile, the M24 also reaches a top speed of 56km/h. With tracks, so it can maintain a higher speed on worse terrain too, with actual armor, low speed stab, a 50cal on the roof, while being at 3.7, which is the proper br for it.
So what the heck justifies the 5.3 br for the EBR 1951 ??? Its a 3.7 “tank” that can reach a higher top speed than the M24, under optimal conditions . But can be penetrated by a 50cal, has no low-speed stabilizer but an especially bouncy gun, worse off-road mobility, and no heavy machine gun.
The EBR 1951 loses to the M24 in every aspect but on-road top speed. Nothing justifies 5.3 for it, not even the .5 faster aced reload.
XM-1 Chrysler 9.0 → 9.3
It is XM-1 (gm)'s clone but at lower battle rating. This month’s br change moves t55’s up to 9.0 and XM-1 is better than t55 in every aspect, so it’s a bit unfair that that XM-1 Chrysler stays at the same br.
The only other non spaa and free tanks at 9.7 are the Vextra and the CV90. The vextra is basically a worse Rooikat or Centauro at a higher BR, already suffering from Gaijins “hatred” for France. So you’d essentially take a Cv90, a wheeled vehicle that gets a round considered decent for 8.7-9.0 and a glorified AMX-32(120) worse than most 9.7 tanks to 10.0, sounds like a great time for the french playerbase. What would be reasons to move the AMX-40 up to 10.0 anyway? Its similar to the Leo 2k but worse in almost every way exept for thermals and a blowout panel in the turret.
The main reason Kfir is sitting in that BR is flight model, which is ways better than the F-5E, yet it is ridiculous to argue that it should be moved to a lower BR.
In an ideal world the F-5E and Kfir Canard should not have the same BR, but with the current BR compression that is not possible so it is better to stay with the current BR.
Top1 incompetent player comment i’ve ever seen. Looking at your massivly skill issue stats, the problem is that people like you have the right to comment on a topic like this.
If you guys will increase the BR of AMX 13 with solid shot shells. How about increasing the spall damage also? And also no nerf for YAK with 45 APHE for GRB? eg like more gun spread or mix belt? no pure aphe? And gonna spade the lower BR one while its still very good…LOL
Ralistic Air battles: Vautour: 9.0-8.3? or airspawn
I find it nice that the Vautour’s are going down in br id like them to do the same in Air RB as well, they are sitting at a 9.0 battlerating with no airspawn and generaly takes off slower than more or less enything else on the airfiled, outside the fact that its a subsonic bomber without afterburners it dosent have mutch going as it lacks manuvrebility and flares unlike some strike aircrafts that sits at lower br’s, one thing that can be done is give it airspawn to start with, i know there is a thread on the forums thats spesifically for the Vautour’s due to the issues it has
(tecnically repeat from last time since nothing happend with it still being same br without airspawn)
Like I said the TKX (P) has specific point on the hull and one on the mantlet over the type 90.
Respectfully, ive survived more in the type 90, believe its composites are modelled better or layout is better.
It was stated by another which I agreed with that the TKX (P) loses some of the mobility for marginally better protection. overall not just the turret.
The issue is, and bear with me here, the Type 90s can see 10.3 where you have tanks such as the CR1 MK2 which barely has a 220 angle pen round (L23A1)
Or the soviet T72B’s which while good for the BR seriously cant hold a candle to the likes of the Type 90.
(I seen you mention the M1A1 as well further down, Im of hte opinion that both the M1A1, M1A1 HC and M1A2 should all be a little higher than they are.)
the M1A1 at 11.3 is better in almost every way than the Leopard 2PL bar in maybe optics yet is a lower BR.
Completely agree, think I mentioned it to someone else further up.
The tanks when going down absolutely dominate the BRs , M1A1, Type 90s .
(ztz99s) etc
but when going up the way, they get crushed, like a type 90 VS STRV 122+ is just silly, dont get me wrong you can do more against the STRV witha type 90 than say damage to a type 90 with a CR1 Mk2.
as always the games issues would be resolved with decompression
I have the TKX(P) and type 90s and genuinely believe they should be put to 11.7, they have too much effect on 10.3 games and absolutely are ruining that BR bracket.
Along iwth the M1A1, M1A2 (no tank with m829A2 should be seeing 10.7) ZTZ99’s etc ,
We need 12.7 BR for ground (at least) to give some bloody breathing room for these vehicles.
Because the shir 2 program was used as the basis for the CR1?
However that doesnt change the fact they reworked a lot of the internals, gunners sights etc for CR1.,
Though in the middle of both is a bit of a stretch, its essentially a worse armoured and fire capable CR1 Mk1 /mk2.
though at 10.0 it really should get the L23A1 round now.
well shir 2 is the basis for challenger but most of its literal parts are chieftain, and its armour protection is not much better than stillbrew in practice, and your hull is weaker.
the only thing going for it is mobility on par with everyone else’s vehicles at that BR. if its too much to be even with everyone else then idk what to tell ye