Not even remotely true, you’re probably playing them wrong. Maybe there’s an argument for the standard B2, but the BRENUS is just so much better.
Nah bro, they tend to play Japan most of the times
it already fights thermals & stabilizers. worse thermals, but still.
just shoot first and no problemo, just dont get hit.
when holding a solid position 2.5s is enough to deal with several people coming in a row. and the round is just about good enough to effectively frontally kill any vehicles up to 11.0 from weakspots.
i would love to have a vehicle like that. there is the 2s reload vcc 80/60, but the 60mm damage is quite poor compared to nato 105mm.
in arcade battles, or? its 9.0 in air realistic.
I think we’ve already missed had like 2 bracket additions by now based on past patterns, no announced bracket changes yet again afaik, and to top it off no sim br adjustments whatsoever for the second time in a row. Truly the neglect sim players suffer is staggering
technically its inbetween both
Its the direct steb between chief and challenger so is a kinda like a mutt of both
sure dude, guess you have reading issue smh
Proposed BR Adjustments for Ground RB.
EC-665 Tiger UHT (11.7): Lower to 11.7 maybe even (11.3). Pars 3LR missiles are highly ineffective, often yielding only 2 kills from 8 missiles. Lacks cannon and radar, making it vulnerable.
F4F KWS LV (11.7): Keep at 11.7. Equipped with only 2 Mavericks and no other guided munitions, unlike peers with 4-6. Moving to 12.0 requires adding 4-6 Mavericks.
Eurofighters (12.7): Stay at 12.7. Excellent airframe but no fire-and-forget munitions. Brimstones, the least lethal option, require constant laser lock while dodging missiles, demanding far more effort for 6 kills compared to peers.
Suggestion: Ground RB BR ratings should prioritize air-to-ground capabilities over air-to-air loadouts for fairer balance, after all it is GROUND RB. Thanks for your consideration.
1 Like
F-14A (+ IRIAF) & F14B both be given better IRCCM missiles or lowered one step as they are not that good jets.
1 Like
AMX-13 (all of them) be lowered as they are not good at such high BRs.
Because you have a warped reality, and only see one side.
Considering a YouTuber is not an average player, and often is quite suspicious in the players they fight.
They also seem to have preferential match making.
My stat card is better with the KV-1E, lol yes, that ace crew, knowing all the strengths, and all the weakenesses, etc. hmm could also be odds of what I see vs you.
You have to face the turret away to block shots? (Your gun can get clipped at any angle), Turn it towards the enemy to kill them? (Can still be taken out). No brainer chief
The SA.342M should probably get moved from 9.7 to 9.3 as well. It’s only 0.3 away from the Tiger HAP and is no-contest the inferior helicopter by every metric.
Those are mostly “I played 8 hours to make a 10-minute video that makes me look cracked” type of content creator, not saying they ain’t good but most has their ign renamed to “player” so we cannot stat check them to find their kd lol
3 Likes
Stop with the bullshit, tell me why it should stay at 6.7 then? Oh wait you can’t. It decimates early jets and late props and can still go pound for pound in its max BR of 7.7.
1 Like
su25sm3 ground rb 12.7→12.3
sm3 have no advantage to mirage 2000d rmv but have higher br
jh7a air rb 12.3→11.7
no pl8b no pl5e2 but such a high br
or just give irccm and stay 12.3
q5a q5l air rb 10.0→9.3 a5c 10.7→10.3
250-2 2 for 1 base nerf to 3 for 1
shenyang f5(mig-17_f5) air rb ground rb 9.3→9.0
it should be lower br then a mig-19 or mig-21
f5e(cn) f16blk15 mlu
should have aim9p4
tkxp ground rb 11.7 but add type10 apfsds
1 Like
tc-1l ground rb 10.3→9.7
it just worse then 9.7 il mim-72 but in a crazy 10.3 as 9m35m even higher then lav-ad
1 Like
You don’t think they have floppy guns? there is no mbt that can match the floppy gun of the AMX-30. the the BRENUS and B2 have identical gun handling.
I haven’t.
You never stated anything about the hull armour being different, just that the turret is weaker in general – other than the outer cheek armour:
In a full downtier (or even 10.7 downtier) though, Type 90’s might be more useful:
Not disagreeing with you here:
I think there needs to be further decompression at top tier and then move the M1A1, Type 90, and TKX (P) up to 11.7.
The problem is that they’re neither fit for 11.3 nor 11.7 (either it’s too good for the BR or too mediocre) at the moment.
3 Likes