uk sherman 2 does get apcr but its useless and ahistorical, hull is a bit stronger but probably not enough to make a difference. 3.3 would be nice.
4 Likes
Air Simulator Battles, Mirage IIIE, 11.0 → 10.7, only has access to either 2 rear aspect heat seeker missiles missiles and a CW SARH missile, or 3 heat seeker missiles, the 2 non optional heat seekers are Magic 1 dogfight missiles with 35g pull, but short range, and the SARH or heat seeker is the Matra 530/E, with only 15g however much longer range. the Mirage IIIE only has access to a pulse radar, which is prone to losing track without countermeasures deployment below 2000m, and has no chaff or clutter rejection available. the RWR is a Sensor based unit, with only four sensors, one in the front, back and sides, and only has Pulse or CW notification, with no launch warning. Its engine is especially weak for its br with a afterburning thrust of 6110 kgf, compared to the MIG-21Bis’ engine which has a afterburning thrust of 7050 kgf or the J-7E’s afterburning thrust of 6460 kgf, or F-4E’s afterburning total thrust of 16020 kgf
The Mirage IIIE is notably less capable than its counterparts at its own br, with less missiles and a weaker engine than other fighters at its own BR, and is worse is most ways than the F-4E, which sits at 10.7. In addition, from my perspective, the Mirage IIIE suffers more in Simulator battles than Air Realistic due to the loss of markers showing enemy players and missiles, despite its higher BR in Simulator Battles.
2 Likes
As a joke, with Gaijin’s recent move with Q-5A/L,
I can’t wait to see non-GR.4 Tonka becomes from 11.3/11.7 to 11.7/12.0 and GR.4 goes 12.7 and ties up with D-RMV
‘Because they bomb too good!!! You want buff? Then nerf base reward!!!’
while MiG-23ML gangs go 11.7->11.3 and F-4S goe 12.0->11.7
2 Likes
Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised. Though if it goes to 12.7, they can just give it ASRAAM 😜
1 Like
cant agree more
Like why, at first you would need to change every EF not just the German one. What about the Rafal it’s at least as good as the EF If Not better. Of course the flight model of the EF and the Rafal are better then the ones of the F18 and Su30 but you only have 6 Radar missiles on the EF while you can take 12 on the Su 30or 10 on the F18.
amx-40 too :p
1 Like
I just don’t get why Gaijin hates strike aircraft when they can destroy a base for a reward, in that level of hatred… :/
Even Gary King(From the world’s end) or Baroness Maggy wasn’t this aggressive.
It might be completely unhistorical rubbish, and Bug reports will be spammed
But 50% of them will be rejected by ‘contains classified document’, and the other half will stay for years with another British bug report.
And Tabloids will enjoy showing the breaking news about this. :(
1 Like
France has no other 10.0 ground vehicles. You might as well remove it from the game then. It is fine at its 9.7 BR.
1 Like
It’s just like that sometimes, look at the M1 Abram’s at 10.7. You only have a line up with 10.3 and 10.0 tanks
When i stock grind the GR.4 its slower than phantoms ironically bc i need 5000 pounds of bomb a base while phantoms with 2 napalms barely needs a 2000 topped off with a full a2a kit
2 Likes
cuz its french
Please either remove airspawns all together, or stop pulling them from specific aircraft. The XP-50 was designed as an interceptor, and DESERVES to get an airspawn, same as the Fw-190s you’ve pulled the spawn from. Maybe don’t start them so far forward, sure, but completely removing them from cherry-picked aircraft is NOT the way to go about it.
Mode: Ground Realistic
Vehicle: T77E1
Change: Rank Change from II to III, Swap places with M19A1
Reasoning: The T77E1 is a much more potent Anti-Aircraft platform than the M19A1 and since its move to 4.0 It feels like it fits much better situated after the M19A1 in the tech tree at the start of rank III than it does at rank II.
You call me a genius and that would be correct in comparison to you.
You don’t understand. The KV-1E lacks a shell / gun capable of damaging a lot of things at 5.0, let alone 5.3
It’s a heavy tank. ITS SUPPOSED TO HAVE ARMOR.
It’s not a TD with a massive gun.
why change br of TKX P and Type 81 C from 11.3 to 11.7 when both are perfectly balanced at 11.3 while making a line up with premium Type 90 b Fuji. if TKX P moves to 11.7 despite our efforts against it then it should recieve a better APFSDS round because JM33 (DM33) is kinda hard for 11.3 already but JM33 at 11.7? a very bad idea
1 Like
I beg to differ. 2 mauses can cause alot of damage. And the comparison, of downtier v downtier
Maus v KV-1E many many more things can kill the Kv-1E over the Maus.
Unless you in a T92 or some time traveling Vietnam lighttank.
You wouldn’t angle in the ARL, you don’t need to.
Soviet 8.7 are bullying all of this unplayable stuff at stupid BRs like Leopard 1 M48 Char25 and another. Why? Because genius developer put it so high and now same developer want to make T-55 tanks usless like them too. So what they can do except making more and more boring barely playable tanks at unfair BRs? Maybe put all of this german and french and american and another stuff back to old BRs? Leopard 1 was at 7.3 and it wasnt even good just okay. M48 was okay at 7.0 for example. Maybe such changes can make game more fun without making T-55 equal to TAM or XM-803 or another stuff which are overperforming to ancient soviet tank and without making them free kill courier like Leopard 1 before?