Same here. Given just how unwilling they are to even lower the GR1, I doubt they’ll lower the Gr4. The GR4 has an exceptionally good defensive suite in comparison with practically unlimited flares and chaff, all-aspect MAWS and a great RWR. I’ve been able to consistently get 1+ base kill and 1+ A2A kill in it recently.
12.0 maybe, but much like the Gr7, would rather see it buffed. It’s FM is underperforming and it’s A2G loadout is also pretty poor at the moment without it’s main A2G weapons. Brimstones
Imo, lack of additional armor is not enough to bring in down to 4.7, on uk firefly i personally just removed it since it adds barely any protection but increases the weight by 2 tons, should not go down unless it looses apds.
Air Simulator Battles, Mirage IIIE, 11.0 → 10.7, only has access to either 2 rear aspect heat seeker missiles missiles and a CW SARH missile, or 3 heat seeker missiles, the 2 non optional heat seekers are Magic 1 dogfight missiles with 35g pull, but short range, and the SARH or heat seeker is the Matra 530/E, with only 15g however much longer range. the Mirage IIIE only has access to a pulse radar, which is prone to losing track without countermeasures deployment below 2000m, and has no chaff or clutter rejection available. the RWR is a Sensor based unit, with only four sensors, one in the front, back and sides, and only has Pulse or CW notification, with no launch warning. Its engine is especially weak for its br with a afterburning thrust of 6110 kgf, compared to the MIG-21Bis’ engine which has a afterburning thrust of 7050 kgf or the J-7E’s afterburning thrust of 6460 kgf, or F-4E’s afterburning total thrust of 16020 kgf
The Mirage IIIE is notably less capable than its counterparts at its own br, with less missiles and a weaker engine than other fighters at its own BR, and is worse is most ways than the F-4E, which sits at 10.7. In addition, from my perspective, the Mirage IIIE suffers more in Simulator battles than Air Realistic due to the loss of markers showing enemy players and missiles, despite its higher BR in Simulator Battles.
I can’t wait to see non-GR.4 Tonka becomes from 11.3/11.7 to 11.7/12.0 and GR.4 goes 12.7 and ties up with D-RMV
‘Because they bomb too good!!! You want buff? Then nerf base reward!!!’
while MiG-23ML gangs go 11.7->11.3 and F-4S goe 12.0->11.7
Like why, at first you would need to change every EF not just the German one. What about the Rafal it’s at least as good as the EF If Not better. Of course the flight model of the EF and the Rafal are better then the ones of the F18 and Su30 but you only have 6 Radar missiles on the EF while you can take 12 on the Su 30or 10 on the F18.
I just don’t get why Gaijin hates strike aircraft when they can destroy a base for a reward, in that level of hatred… :/
Even Gary King(From the world’s end) or Baroness Maggy wasn’t this aggressive.
It might be completely unhistorical rubbish, and Bug reports will be spammed
But 50% of them will be rejected by ‘contains classified document’, and the other half will stay for years with another British bug report.
And Tabloids will enjoy showing the breaking news about this. :(
When i stock grind the GR.4 its slower than phantoms ironically bc i need 5000 pounds of bomb a base while phantoms with 2 napalms barely needs a 2000 topped off with a full a2a kit
Please either remove airspawns all together, or stop pulling them from specific aircraft. The XP-50 was designed as an interceptor, and DESERVES to get an airspawn, same as the Fw-190s you’ve pulled the spawn from. Maybe don’t start them so far forward, sure, but completely removing them from cherry-picked aircraft is NOT the way to go about it.
Change: Rank Change from II to III, Swap places with M19A1
Reasoning: The T77E1 is a much more potent Anti-Aircraft platform than the M19A1 and since its move to 4.0 It feels like it fits much better situated after the M19A1 in the tech tree at the start of rank III than it does at rank II.
why change br of TKX P and Type 81 C from 11.3 to 11.7 when both are perfectly balanced at 11.3 while making a line up with premium Type 90 b Fuji. if TKX P moves to 11.7 despite our efforts against it then it should recieve a better APFSDS round because JM33 (DM33) is kinda hard for 11.3 already but JM33 at 11.7? a very bad idea