I mentioned in my feedback SUB-I-II that is too low, lack of stabilizer is not a problem for these.
That thing is faster on cap than hellcat and in the same time as puma.
(which helps in early cap so can get plane, I used it with combination of premium A7M1 to unlock all R2Y2 before they will be removed)
Maybe Luchs is not as good as Type 87 RCV but I also listed BTR because in my opinion all these vehicles should go up and if Japanese variant is so good, it should go to 8.0.
Paradox of these vehicles is that they actually work better on higher tier because there is more light tanks around.
The only problem for me with luchs is that it should get CLEAN APDS belt like XM800T.
(also it have thermals so camp and spot for team as much as you can)
m735 pens chal 2 just like it pens the fv when the chal doesnt have its dozer blade attached.
the dozerblade on the challenger 2 works additional armor and helps against weak rounds like 735, but also its more weight. 735 still pens anywhere in the above the dozer and under the turret area and it also goes tru the dozer to the lfp rather easily, but the dozer does help against upper frontplate shots which are shot tru it.
its strange you did not mention the dozerblade at all, if you think it makes so huge of a difference.
dozer makes 0 difference with 3bm42 and it goes tru boths hulls like butter. the turret will tank the shell for both vehicles at medium & long range.
the armor profiles of the tanks itself are identical.
me when air sim doesnt get any changes second time in a row
Mode : Ground Realistic
Vehicle : Object 435
BR Change : 8.7 > 8.7 (do not raise)
The tank is similar to Object 122MT “MC” (8.7) and has no advantages over T-55s and tanks 9.0
lack of stabilizer is not a problem at 5.3, but when facing stabilized enemy vehicles, you really need one to compete effectively.
luchs seems very good on paper, but the lack of acceleration & huge size makes it really bad. you have no idea how much worse it is against tanks than the wiesel is for example.
go play it before suggesting any changes to it.
it has a 14.5, its an advantage, no? also a better round and stronger turret than t55amd for example.
i agree, its not as good as t55amd/am1 or t62m1, but it is better than the 8.7 t62.
Ahh, Luchs is absolute dog water, especially compared to the Wiesel… It’s so slow, big and has a terrible gun.
F14 (ALL)
Back to 12.7
Those just dont belong in 13.0
Sadly T62 can only worth 8.3 when compared to 55A
Add a bit of speed, add a 14.5, reduce some overpressure survivability and enlarge the side weak zone
435 stays good for 8.7
moving up the AMX-13’s and the AMX M4 is fucking criminal.
Centaouro is a light tank and its very agile its pretty good
this tank is weak, it should be moved to 8.3 because it is the same level as the T-55A (8.3) that is already there
and the 435 itself is equal to the Chinese Object 122, the Chinese have ATGMs, the 435 has a good machine gun
Meanwhile A-10 with agm-65 on 10.7 su-25 su-39 su-24 with X-29, mirage 2000d-r1 tornado gr.1 tornado IDS ASSTA1 11.3. But no K2K can’t play 11.3 no matter that ISR doesn’t have 11.7 tanks
M2KD R1 does carry only SAL weaponry, and while the AS30L is very good, its limited to only 2. In total, it can use up to 5 air to ground ammunition but isn’t capable of carrying a gun pod at the same time. It’s also completely incapable of doing decent CAP since it lacks radar missiles and is limited to 2 AAM (although magic 2 are great)
The FM of the plane is excellent but I don’t think it’s better than the K2K overall in ground RB when mavericks always have the edge of being FnF (and harder to spot and destroy than the AS30L)
The SU22M3 had:
1x KDS-23 decoy launcher with twelve cartridges (the one we have now)
4 × Artem ASO-2V decoy launchers with 32 × 26 mm decoys each ( the 128 that Syria is missing )
1 × SPS-141/142/143 jammers (are pods
designed for electronic warfare (EW))
Initially when it was added it sat at 11.3 but since that one update it’s fine at 11.0. However because of the other aircraft it encounters, it is still greatly outmatched because of the lack of countermeasures. Yet somehow it shares the same br as the Su22 M4 that has those additional flares & Chaff, which should then sit at 11.3 if they choose to give the M3 the countermeasures
It’s better than the T-62 with better armour, speed, has a HMG and coincidence rangefinder, but it’s not 9.0 material. The T-62M-1 and ZTZ88 sit at 9.0…
I don’t see pantsir going to 12.3 on this list?
a lot of your ss’s are either showing ridicoulously small spots where it would be difficult to hit even if you want to lol.
pretty much everyone hit you in the hull or turret ring area that does not withstand pretty much anything. both type 90 and TKX are getting killed by autocannon frontally and you can feel it when both playing in one or against it
like 11.7 you have t80u’s, late abrams, some leos and pretty much everything is better than it there. it was fine at 11.3 and i dont think i ever had an issue penning it from 10.3 vehicles (cv90, boxers, even early 120mm sabot shells) like i get it that you have unparalleled mobility but thats about it for both tanks and imo on 11.7 thats just not enough. it would kill the vehicle