the FLARELESSS SUBSONICS watching PAINFULLY as the SU-25SM3 fires a THRUST VECTORING IRCCM MISSILE at them in FRONT ASPECT
1 Like
Air RB: Hunter F1 (9.0->8.7) Hunter F1 has a poor engine; it is definitely worse than cl mk6 or f3h. It should go against mig 17 & 15, f86
Air RB: Sagittarro2 (9.3->9.0) Since Ariete is much better than Sag2, sag2 should have a lower BR
2 Likes
You don’t need IRCCM missiles to dunk on flareless planes my dude.
Do you really think they’re going to take your request seriously when you can’t even get the most basic information right ?
Man, what did the KV-1S do to you to deserve this fate?
2 Likes
I mentioned T1E1 90 and MBT in other cases I mentioned ammo and reload and br increase if it will perform like with XM-1 because with ammo and reload it could work at 9.7-10.0 , so nice try…
IPM1
11.3 → 11.0 or → 11.3
Reason: Currently it shares its br with the now better M1A1 since the M1A1 got a reload buff to 5 seconds while retaining better firepower and having an equal reload. The IPM1 currently would fit better to the 11.0 bracket
or just remove the 5 second reload from the M1A1 specifically and keep it 11.3
1 Like
M1A1
11.3–>11.3
Remove 5 second reload: The 5 second reload on this abrams makes the IPM1 all but useless since it has the same reload and way less firepower in comparison
1 Like
Ariete AMV
12.0—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the Leopard 2A7s is at the same br while being better in every way. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.
4 Likes
The ARL only has ~80 of frontal protection on it’s hull and 50 to 60mm on it’s side. infact both the KV-1B and E can penetrate it’s entire UFP.
The oddity is that you think that ARL is overpowered and that the KV-1s are not.
2 Likes
C1 Ariete PSO
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.
4 Likes
C1 Ariete (WAR)
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.
4 Likes
Just decrease the reload speed of M1A1 and it should be enough.
IPM1 doesn’t belong at 11.0.
im not going to lie i just pasted what i wrote last time we had one of these
Air RB Mirage 2000 C-S5 back to 12.3 please!
It cannot compete against FOX-3 carriers, it has to play defensive until it is the last plane in the team
wyvern 4.7? Is there any buff on airframe or what.
Kurnass 2000
11.7->11.3(Revoke this unreasonable change)
Reason:The K2000’s carrying capacity is not as good as that of the American 11.7 F111F. If you need to carry a laser-guided bomb while carrying an AGM65D, you can only use a pod with a 10x magnification and no thermal imaging function.Moreover, the current number of points for mounting AGM65D has reached an unacceptable level
1 Like
I don’t really understand the habbit of making Ground RB BRs of helis and jets higher than the BR cap of ground vehicles. Its makes them impossible to use.
I’d also request BR reduction of the dumb-bomb only Tornados by -0.3 BR. Its just neccessary. Their current BR is too high and they can’t compete to reach bases before other do and bomb them. Its always the last to arrive. Its air to air capabilities are super meh as well… Its BR need to be lower.
1 Like
What buff does it even need??? Its capabilities make it literally as good as a 6.0 strike aircraft, being able to bomb bases with a single loadout and having tons of ammo while maintaining a high speed still comparable to an early jet (sea level straightline speed is literally 650 km/h). Not to mention it still has its airspawn for some reason. A vehicle should be judged according to its capabilities in its own role.
1 Like
Its outer cheek armour is actually pretty good – up to ~600mm:
Its inner cheek armour is okay, but isn’t great – around 400mm:
Its Breech is around 200mm thick, though the breech area is smaller than that of the Type 90’s:
For comparison (Type 90’s):
What’s funny is that the 10.7s Abrams can’t pen the breech of the Type 90.
In general, the TKX (P) has stronger strongpoints (turret cheeks) and smaller (albeit weaker) weakpoints (breech) for the turret. I’d say it’s better overall.
The lower UFP of the TKX (P) is worth around ~600-570mm, which is enough to block most, if not, all MBT rounds at 10.3-11.3 – even most from 11.7 and 12.0:
For comparison (Type 90’s):
Seems to only be around 430-410mm, which is still great for a ‘no-armour’ MBT.
The Upper UFP of the TKX (P) also is steeper, which can sometimes be trolly enough to ricochet APFSDS:
For comparison (Type 90’s):
