Mode: Ground realistic
Vehicle: 2S38
BR Change: higher BR needed, 11.3
Reason: its just a joke how good is it at 10.3, HSTVL is worse and has 11.3. So need rebalance or change the BR.
1 Like
So whats the reason behind moving the merkavas to 9.7? There’s got to be some stats/reasoning that prove this thing is too strong for the BR. But you’re just leaving other 9.3’s that are just flat out better/performing better there?
You are making a one tank lineup at 9.7 that will predominantly get put at 10.3 and 10.7 because you decompressed 9.7 so there’s no 9.7 lineups, or 10.0. In what world should this thing see a leopard 2A4? Israel 9.3 currently sits in 2nd place as the worst winrate 9.3 lineup at 46% WITH those tanks. What will it become now its literally three of the same magachs and a machbet?
Why would i ever bother to play through the 8.7 lineup now to end up at 9.3 with three of the same vehicle and then at 9.7 with one vehicle?
Mode: Ground RB
Vehicle: F-15J
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: Compare to F-15A, which is moving to 12.0, it does not have any precision guided munition (GBU-8).
Thus, they should have the same BR.
2 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: AMX-40
Change: 9.7 > 9.7
Reasoning: AMX-40 has excellent mobility, but its other performances are not as good. The armor is not at all reliable, as it can be overtaken by the HEATFS 105mm gun, although it contains composite armor. Its firepower is also not excellent. For example, the Leopard2K, which is often compared as a similar vehicle, has a DM23, but this shell has higher penetration than the AMX-40’s OFL120G1 and is heavier and has superior damage. Thus, the AMX-40 does not have the performance of the BR10.0. Therefore, we do not believe it should be changed from 9.7.
5 Likes
Can you please lower the second stage reload time on the Leopard 2s at once? 24 seconds at maximum qualification is too much, it should be more like the time it takes to replenish the primary ammo rack from the secondary (13-14 seconds per round) since 24 seconds is closer to what it would take to replenish an autoloader.
Can you explain how they’re strong and how they’re stronger than other 9.3’s.
Maybe it’s the size, wt players seem to have issues with little things. My stepsister said the Object 435 is in this picture, maybe she was trolling as I only can see Merkavas?
1 Like
The Obj 435 is pretty decent but its not the best
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Kurnass 2000
Change: 11.7 → 11.3
Reason: Israel does not have 11.7 MBT to play 11.7, aircraft doesn’t have thermal scope,
They are definitely the tankiest of all Merkavas due to amount of poor ammunition being thrown at it in that BR range. It has really good gun handling, thermals and a dart that ignore most 9.3 armor. It also comes with a LWS which is an added bonus.
Sorry but K2k doesn’t really belong at 11.3 with Mavericks.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Type 81 (C)
If you plan to raise a short-range flack without radar to 11.7 and thus also fall out of a playable lineup and Japan again has no more flak from 9.3 to the end
Then I expect you to raise the Strella flack, which operates in the same way, by at least 1 BR for all nations.
The same applies to the 2S38 which operates in the same way as an Otomatic at 11.3 only a complete BR further down.
So step up the 2S38 or step down the Otomatic to 10.7
what the heck is this logic, so you’re saying it is ok to just move them up because they’re always getting uptiered?
Nah J-7D need to be move higher.
2 Likes
Vehicle: Falcon
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 8.3 > 7.7 (APDS deletion)
Reason: The APDS on this vehicle is extremely threatening and I believe it needs to be modified. I suggest that instead of removing the APDS for this vehicle, the BR be set to 7.7.
1 Like
True, only larpers use APHE instead of APDS or darts at 8.3 and above, but I guess this is off topic.
Mode: Naval RB
Vehicle: USS Des Moines
BR Change: 6.3 > 6.0
Reasoning:
Bad armor, bad shell room and magazine placement making it easy to ammo rack.
Firepower inadequate for the battle rating and versus Battleships and Battlecruisers
GRB
Radkampfwagen 90
10.0 → 9.7
Reason:
Sure it has good mobility, BUT No Thermal, No LWS, Paper armor and an aced 6.7 reload with just DM33
4 Likes
totally agreed 200/100 comment