i can agree with alot but moving the merkavas and the namer is dumb, they arnt very good as is only being decent because no one uses them enough for folks to know where to shoot, i accept ten sabra going up as top tier round at 9.7 is stupid
also why is the amx40 going up? its not amazing, solid but nothing crazy
you rarely get downtiers ever its just uptiers because of the amount of people playing 12.0-13.0
its good, its much better than most of the 9.3 vehicles, but not leo2k material.
Maybe they are preparing to decompress 9.0-9.3 by first moving the rest of the 9.7 mbts to 10.0, or something? would be about time t-72a/m & kpz went up.
thats just normal, i get full uptiers in 70% of my matches no matter what i play.
but yet i play the mig 29, and i almost get all downtiers with r27ers and r60ms… idk they need to fix something
Maybe Gaijin just needs to hire 5 players with 2000GE per month, which could be better than paying a team with over $10000 XD
sounds like a time for decompression, not more compression like your suggestion.
you put it down in br and everything below will suffer.
gaijin needs to take a grip and decompress.
ive been playing them just to re confirm, im top of the leaderboard most games and i still 100% believe these vehicles are awful tanks.
Drop the FG.1 to 11.7 and label it an “early variant.”
Add AIM-9Ls to the FGR.2 and F-4J(UK), and keep them at 12.0 for some variety.
Out of curiosity, what feels “better” when playing them. I spaded the AV-8C last year and am about to start on the GR.3.
This is especially important since the population of BI users is increasing with the sales of the Infantry Backpack.
At top tier, the HMD is a more obvious weakness than the lighter weight. You can immediately notice the lack of HMD but you need to have a good understanding of the flight model to really feel the weight difference.
Less experienced players are also generally not as good at making use of good flight performance and rely more on avionics and weaponry.
If you want a good discussion on both vehicles, watch DEFYNs video on them both.
The VT1-2 can only do so because it has a hybrid powerplant and uses electric motors to turn and drive. When the engines are destroyed it runs off a battery.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Tank: FlaRakRad
Change: 11.7 → 10.7
Reasoning: The FlaRakRad has the same performance as the FlaRakPz 1 due to same weaponry and deserves to be at least 10.7 to be more balanced
Please don’t kill the Type 81C again, Japan 11.3 needs air defense, the Type 93 has never been enough and never will. It already doesn’t have a radar, and the Tor M1 is 11.0. This thing literally can’t kill KA-52’s as it is because it both can’t get a lock unless they sit in the sky and give it to you, and can’t hold the lock because of the IRCM blocks
I want to ask one question about naval BR change after Hornets Sting update, including current planned battle rating changes.
Is there a long term planning of lowering entire destroyers and cruisers Battle Rating, including making reserve destroyer from 3.3 ~ 3.7 to like 2.X?
If current battle rating changes are just part of gradual long term planning of lowering overall bluewater vehicle’s battle rating, and developers announces it to players, than current rage of people about nowadays BR compression could be turned into hope of future BR decompression.
He’s right. The Ki-44-II hei has an outstanding FM. A +1.3 BR jump is a bit extreme, but its seriously way too good for 3.7.
Shows a lot about the WT community that a detailed post about an undertiered plane gets one like, and the reply ‘no’ gets four likes.
Gotta be one of the most annoying planes in the game. Definitely needs to go up, or have its airspawn diminished to an attacker spawn.
Also if you look here: StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics, it has one of the highest WRs of any plane in the game
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
it has vt-1 missiles compared to roland 3s.