AMD.35 (SA35) 1.7 → 1.0
It’s worse in every way than the reserve AMD.35 which is at 1.0…
Why is it higher in BR???
Because it’s a premium/event vehicle???
6 Likes
Mode: Air RB
Aircraft Su22-M3
Reasoning:
With the changes to the Russian aircraft, one other that should be changed is the SU22M3.
Yes it’s a squadron vehicle but the lack of countermeasures makes it impossible to play at its Br. There is nothing initially wrong with the battle rating, but the threats from other aircraft is the problem. But with the addition of its side mounted countermeasures it is able to keep up with the aircraft at its tier.
Didn’t the syrians add extra flares to their su22. And what br are you proposing?
Mode: Ground realistic
vehicle: M1 Abrams / M1 KVT
BR Change 10.7 → 10.3
Reasoning: At its BR of 10.7 it has no line up can be uptired to 11.0-11.7 where its armor is rendered absolutely useless even some vehicles at 9.3 can go right through the turret armor. The only real advantage it has is its speed its armor is mediocre and its best APFSDS round is not very good compared to most vehicles at its BR and below its BR
Usual snail shenanigans, I guess TGP and JDAMs are meta in air-to-air combat 🤷♂️
Yeah, must be, and can’t forget that killing 4x AI with GBUs is much easier than killing 12x AI with unguided bombs
Type 81, in what world does that go up?
This was introduced at what, 10.0?
Since then a lot more jets have been added that far outrange it whilst it’s complete dogwater, expected to go against jets that launch things from 10-20km away whilst it cannot get a lock beyond 5km, and lacks a radar to even detect them.
Absolutely mental to pretend this is on par with the Pantsir.
11 Likes
I think all F-104Gs, and F-104Ss need a 0.3/0.4 BR decrease, their only tool is speed and acceleration and at their current BRs it’s not a big enough advantage to balance their lacklustre missile load outs. The Italian F-104G, while having CMs, has only 2 very mediocre for 11.0 Aim-9Js. That thing faces 12.0 vehicles with look down radars, all aspect missiles, and solid SARH missiles that you have no hope of dodging in the 104 if they get an MTI or PD lock.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: EBR 1951
Change: 5.3 → 5.0/4.7
Reasoning: Despite having a good top speed and reverse gear, the acceleration on any path other than concrete road feels like a medium tank. The firepower is also relatively poor with M61, there is no reason to put it at 5.3 (If you compare to M24, simply having a good top speed doesn’t justify 1.6 BR gap)
14 Likes
you are not serious with these changes br? I swear if these changes are approved I will stop playing this game
Mediocre turn performance is praising the tornados a bit too much. As the 11.7 tornados currently stand, as bad as the planes were before Hornet’s sting, they now face the premium hoarde of 12.7 F-18s
1 Like
Well exactly lol my point is even further proven
The same happens with AMX A-1
alright the strv 103C can go to 9.0 BR only if it gets the seperated engines cuz it just doesnt make sense to have a non stabilised cheese wedge facing 10.0 tanks where youll get penned by everything. If the VT1-2 can hull aim with its engine destroyed so should the double engined cheese wedge then.
3 Likes
us and british spaa are already more than capable to destroy them it isn’t that good and wouldn’t compare to the rooivalk
It wouldn’t be a round of br changes without France getting kicked in the nuts lmao. The only one that makes sense for tanks is the AMX M4
Does locking onto them do anything with either modes?
FV4030 stays at 9.7 it’s actually pretty well balanced there.
3 Likes
Pzh-2000 7.7 → 8.0
3 Likes
I kinda agree, though I don’t really like how the T-55AM1 would just be 0.7 difference in BR with it.