well glad to see that they are still messing up the battle rankings for planes the A-10s should get lower BR rating due to how slow and easy they are to kill
Let’s address a ridiculous issue ASAP! WHY nobody suggesting to move the degenerated M44 from 4.0 to 7.0-8.0??? It’s a cold war vehicle it should be put together with cold war vehicle! FIX your damn game already and move stuff not based on their performance but the actually Era they belong to!
2 Likes
They nerfed it quite a lot.
It used to have a shoulder stabilizer, and its 50.Cal used to elevate way higher which also had a lot more ammo / didn’t overheat.
I think it was 2.0 / 2.3 material back when those were still a thing.
I think 2.0 is fine but 1.7 might be more reasonable.
1 Like
Disappointed that 2S38 isn’t on the list but I cant say I’m not surprised. Why would they kill their cash cow? But at least Kh38MT carriers got bump to 13.0 in GRB which is nice, although pretty late.
Suggestion
Game mode: Realistic Battles, NF
Ocean Going Torpedo Boat Chidori **BR 3.7 - 3.3 **
The vessel has been at BR 3.7 for several years since its original release in the old TT, I was to original make a post talking about this years ago & to talk about the RP requirements yet here we’re double the costs.
The vessel sits at 3.7 in a place with not much of a lineup bar the JDS Isuzu DE-211 & the far superior recent addition of the much cheaper Matsu class Light Destroyer which basically does everything it does but better, ntm it has a third cannon, more LAA & four 410 mm torpedoes.
The Chidori is honestly over BR’ed, it could be a 3.3 an wouldn’t be OP, it’s also the late war refit as seen by the lose of the afterwards third 120 mm cannon & only has two torpedoes (gaijin please may it receive the reload back again if you now model the torpedoes on the rails between the funnel).
3 Likes
Preferrably 12.3 for top ground as well, not a lot of candidates neccessary like there is really only L2A7V/HU/122, T-80BVM, S1 and kind of type 10 that actually needs an extra BR
Im not a fan of adding cold war vehicles to WW2 BRs either and M44 shouldnt have been added in the first place either but unlike the cancer wagons with laser ramgefinders, M44 would be useless at these BRs.
2 Likes
Suggestion
Mode: Realistic Battles NF
Town class (1940) destroyer HMS Churchill I45 BR 3.3 to 3.0
I was about to suggest an ability to get this before 2.45 dropped yet (moved to coastal TT), this will do instead.
The vessel could easily fall into similar lines as the Project 2 Guardship SKR Groza, the Churchill is a convoy escort so they lack of main armament makes sense.
A reduction to 3.0 would allow it some more flexibility over other destroyers.
1 Like
Yup lol same reason Italy has so many overtiered vehicles… kinda sucks being a minor nation sometimes lmao
1 Like
Vehicle: Chinese top tier MBTs(ZTZ99A, WZ, VT4)
Gamemode and BR: GRB/GAB/GSB, BR Unchanged
Additional changes: Reload rate from 7.1s to 6.5s
The lack of both pen and reload make the tank(s) that has decent armor deemed ineffective for frontline gameplay. It is outmatched in protection or surviability by some opponents as well.
3 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Mig 23ML (SOV)
Change: 11.7 → 12.0
Time to face the truth, this plane ruins so many joy of playing for others.
3 Likes
Suggestion
Game mode : Ground Realistic Battle
Vehicle : All french ground.
BR Change : +1 BR to all.
Reasoning : You’re gonna do it soon or later anyway, so i suggest we do not waste anymore of our time.
2 Likes
Ill be entirely Honest, i don’t think the FV4030 should go up.
A Worse armored version of the Challenger Mk2? At only .3 BR bellow it? With No Thermals?
Take the L23 away from it, fix L15A5, and keep it at 9.7.
A Properly working L15A5, that isn’t a copy and Paste L15A3 would make it entirely viable at 9.7. And considering the 4030 was designed about FIVE YEARS! before L23 entered service? I think its a very justifiable change.
1 Like
Mode: air realistic Battles
Vehicle: BI
BR Change: 6.7>8.0
Reasoning:
This plane is clearly in the wrong place; it doesn’t differ too much from a me-163 while being in a br where they cannot even face each other. If you’re fling a prop is practically untouchable; for example even in planes like the early variants of the me-262 is very hard to just run away from it, getting guns on is incredibly unlikely.
I can’t see how 6.7 it’s fair for this plane, it needs to go up of at least one whole br.
3 Likes
or the ground search radar :)
1 Like
Vehicle: Early CR2s(CR2/CR2F/CR2TES/CR2OES)
Gamemode and BR: 11.7 to 11.3 in GRB/GAB/GSB
Additional changes: first order ROF from 6.5s/5.0s to 5.2s/4.0s
Every western MBT outside of the leopard 2 now has a 5 second reload, mitigating the only advantage on challengers. Being inferior in protection, mobility and firepower, the tank has no business at top tier.
3 Likes
probably its coastal spawn
you’re very close to the action seconds after spawning and a 100mm shell or two will easily pop most things you’d run into whilst being able to absorb quite a lot of fire from the sort of threats you encounter in the coastal brawl
you mention Groza being the same BR, im fairly certain it has to spawn with the destroyers (dont have it myself), but i would expect it to be as much of a speedboat culling machine as the Marne if it got to spawn further forward as well
Suggestion
Mode: Realistic Battles NF
Ayanami class Destroyer JDS Ayanami DD-103
4.0 to 4.3
The catch is to rerate this warship as a destroyer so secondary & tertiary armament doesn’t fire on it from other destroyers in game.
This is quite a powerful destroyer even if incorrectly labelled a frigate, the vessel might still use WWII cannons, but with three of them it can be potent.
It would also be a nerf if they make 3"/50 Mk. 22 cannons not a belt feed cannon type, as that’s not what these cannons were & fired single shells, the nerf would be the whole empty magazines with two belts trick heh heh heh.
You also gotta mention that the L23 doesnt exist at all
1 Like
Ehh… it DID, but it only saw service for like 6 months, due to how horribly unreliable it was.
It had HORRBILE angled performance, worse than the L15A5 round it replaced.