Why isn’t Sherman II being lowered to 3.3. It’s just a M4A1 Sherman with a useless APCR
3 Likes
“BuT YOu HaVE ApcR!!!”
:/
Kurnass 2000 (12.3), JH-7A (12.3), EJ Kai (12.3), Harrier GR.7 (12.3.), Bison (12.3), F-16A(12.3) vs. AMRAAM capable F-16 with HMS?
You know what, sure. Lets go get em bois
1 Like
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: kfir C7 (this is the last one I send today I promise)
Change: 12.0 → 11.7
Reasoning: a mirage 5 with canards and f4 engine, 0.3 br away from the f16A, not counting its 36 countermeasures and without radar.
If f5 exists with python 3 in 11.3 kfir c7 can exist in 11.7.
but for this change to happen the kfir c2 has to go to the 11 l.3 together with the f5FCU
5 Likes
I am saying the same thing about Iranian tomcat. It’s game play is all about early game presence and it does it well. It could use extra 2 fakours (i made a post asking for this during last BR change but it went unnoticed) to sustain at up tiers but it doesn’t need to be brought down in BR any further.
1 Like
Gaijin, please do something about the M60A3 in the China tree. It is currently the same BR (in all modes) as the US equivalent, except it has no ERA and, more importantly, no M774 shot. So either lower the BR or give it the same ammo options.
7 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Plane:Kurnass 2000
Br change: 12.3>12.0
Reasoning: It’s a Phantom with 6 Python-3s, extra flares and no radar missiles .3 higher than another Phantom with 4 decent IR missiles, 4 decent radar missiles and less flares. Python-3s are good non-IRCCM missiles and more flares are nice, but since it’s missing radar missiles, it has no right to be 12.3.
3 Likes
its basically a leo 1 l/44 but with a trolly hull that bounces rounds
1 Like
To add to your comment there’s also no lineup available at 8.0 for it to work with so you either drag up your 7.7s into 9.0 or drag it up to 8.3 which is a solid lineup but there’s not much of a reason to play it since the ZA-35/Warrior/Falcon pretty much do what it can but better.
Ground Realistic Battles, XM8. 9.7 → 10.0
Gets M833
Historical change, the vehicle itself was introduced after the CCVL (IRL) and should get the M833 – which was initially denied as it was considered a balance value on the bug report site: Community Bug Reporting System
Gaijin states on the CCVL devblog:
The CCVL is the direct ancestor of the AGS, VFM 5 and XM8 light tanks already known to War Thunder tankers. The light chassis gains quite a high power-to-weight ratio, allowing the tank to perfectly overcome off-road terrain, climb hills, and quickly get up to maximum speed.
If the change should occur, the XM8 should swap BR and Ammo with the CCVL so there is not essentially two of the same vehicle.
Both vehicles are also missing functional blow-out panels (credit: Apollo_1641)
2 Likes
11.3 is the best BR for it, just compare it to the J-8B and you’ll see that they are equivalent planes.
there are already 13.0 with fox3 and other 13.3 planes, adding other 13.3 planes will not destroy the game
None of which are AMRAAM capable F-16.
Wiesel has no stab and a smaller magazin aswell. It definetly isnt as good as the XM800
Ok?
foxes cant bully 6.7 german heavies now :(
Leopard 2K and AMX-40 both have: 20mm autocannon, ~30 hp/t, LRF, stabilizer, more or less the same survivability. AMX-40 has gen 1 thermals and slightly worse APFSDS. It would be fair to have them at the same BR, although I would’ve preferred if they put Leopard 2K back to 9.7 rather than change BR of AMX-40.
And the same holds for Radkampfwagen and Vextra.
1 Like
well, this scratches something like 6 talismans off my “to buy” list for next round of sales just in ground vehicles section because of completely butchered lineups. And FV4030 & Merkava 2B coupons I bought earlier are no longer worth claiming and can be sold off again
5 Likes
Fair.
1 Like
Just AIM-120C-3 or AIM-120C-4 to replace AIM-120B and add AIM-120C-7 on F/A-18C late
And decompression BR (Air RB & Air SB) to 14.7