JaguarGR1A, A-10 late, AJ37, and other 10.3 attackers are all worse than the AMX. it gets 6 LGBs and 2 AIM-9Ls while being nimble, very fast for a subsonic and not ripping at high speeds like the Su25.
A6E has limited loadouts and rips quickly in hard turns. the 10.0 Su25s don’t have a targeting pod or LGBs and rip at high speeds. A-10s are super slow in comparison.
5 cm KwK 38 L/42 (As found on Pz III Ausf. F and J as well as P.204 (f) KwK) they were allready nerfed with a useless increase the reload speed from a prio ammo storage.
From 5,2/4 sec to 3.0 (Aced full crew)
For example the: (Aced full crew/Basic)
45mm 20-K has: 3,77/2,9 sec
40mm 2 Pounder has: 3,19/2,8 sec
37mm M6 has: 3,55/2,9 sec
Japanese 47mm has: 4,29/3,3 sec
Italian 47mm has: 3,77/2,9 sec
Even tho its has allways a dedicated Loader its among the slowest to reload. Its fastest is slower than the basic of the other guns.
L-62 ANTI change is unnecessary
Excuse me WHAT
In AB,
Pz.II C, Pz.II C TD and Pz.II C(DAK) have different BR, I think this is a error.
That Strv m/41 S-I and S-II have different BR is strange.
S-I has slightly more engine power iirc, but should go down to 2.3.
Twitch drop is just a gaijn moment, though.
Chieftain Mk.3 : Down BR, 8.7 to 8.3
Reason: The Chieftain mk.3 is very slow, it doesn’t have APFSDS ammo and no LRF (Laser rangefinder) like most of its competitors at the same level . The vehicle would be the equivalent of the M60A1 (AOS) or the T-55A who they’re sitting in 8.3 BR, like the Olifant mk.1 (haves apfsds and LRF)
T-80UD/Object 292 :Raise BR, 10.0 to 10.3
The T-80UD, Obj 292 need to go up to 10.3 at a minimum.T-80UD has a fast reload and K5 ERA, the only negative is no thermal, what is correct to have 0.7 lower of the T 80 U / T-80UM (squadron vehicule of Sweden and russia).
2S38 :Raise BR, 10.0 to 10.7/11.0
2S38 would be fine at 10.7 or 11.0 minimum. HTVL is 11.3 and perform less than 2S38. Why ? HE-VT + tracking system, good reload and bigger ammorack. You have anyway BMP-2M in the same BR too.
20 pdr uptiers? Did you play them latley? Two words… “shell shattered”.
20 pdr. Cents were 6.7 a few years back. Now you wanna put them to 8.0 along with the Leopard 1?
Bro you need to chill. The 120mm Concq is the same br as the Caernarvon, which is worse in every aspect except reload speed. Delete this from your comment for the love of God.
The UD is underwhelming. On what planet is it an issue? It’s got the transmission and engine of a T-72, no thermals, none of the features that make a T-80 appealing, period. Minus the reload rate, which you can beat with manually reloaded tanks with higher crew skill.
Spitfire mk.22 → 6.0
Spitfire mk 24 → 6.3
Reason: P-51H Exsists. That and just that. + Now it will fight MiG-15s…
To quote myself from last time there was a BR change: Spitfires MK.22 and 24 need to go down to 6.3 and 6.7 respectively
The P-51H is not going up, yet it is literally better on paper and in practise than the Spitfire Mk.24 at 7.0 let alone the Mk.22 at 6.7.
Either put the Spitfire Mk.22 and 24 down, or raise the P-51H. It should be at least the same BR as the Mk.22 (despite being better) and at worst on par with the Mk.24.
2S38 is balanced in BR where it is! It is a fragile vehicle, it only has an automatic cannon with one penetration. I think it’s better for you to learn how to play better than to complain about this vehicle unnecessarily.
If you base the BR’s purely off the P-51H being at 6.3 I would agree.
The F-104s will die at 9.7. I know. In my view, it’s better for a vehicle to not be good than for it to absolutely dominate everything below it.
Going up, sure, but it has to fit into a ground lineup, unless we are talking about balance in Air RB. After all, you cannot bring the plane alone into ground RB. It can be balanced by reducing the number of GBUs it carries or even by giving it a buff and moving it to 11.0/11.3.
Honestly I don’t know if he’s stupid or just a troll. seems to think the QF 77MM and 17pdr is eqivalent to the 90mm M3, which is insane. His suggestions in other threads aren’t great either lmao, just mute and move on
Horrible changes! Strela depends a lot on the player to work! Plus, mine is full of errors! There are times when the radar doesn’t lock, other times it locks on the plane but the missile doesn’t fire! Furthermore, in 10.0 it’s already difficult to see and find planes in the skies, especially when there are crap fighters with thermals installed! Strela up to 10.0 is acceptable, but in 10.3?! You are crazy?! Stop listening to flying stumps cry! Start nerfing the planes in AB and RB tanks!
Furthermore, Strela in 10.3 has no vehicles to accompany her on the Russian line! Just like the T-90A in 10.7, just it and one more SPG… These are DEAD levels! You are killing yet another vehicle with this stupid change!
The M-51 fucking sucks, should be 1.3
Its moved only in arcade bruh, radar isnt as needed as RB. Other SPAAs like the WZ305 is also miles higher in AB. Plus, whatever CAS was spawned was a lot more undesirable compared to what was picked in GRB.
The bigger thing with the UD is its unclear role. Newer players wouldve brought the turms for its thermals and added GE for crew skills, skilled players who began working on USSR/Russia only usually needs an 2S38.
The problem here is that the UD is too well protected but everything else is undesirable compared to the turms. The best way to balance it is to give it 3BM46 and moved up to 10.7.
Q-5A should not be moved up to 9.3. The vehicles of 9.0 and 8.7 are moved to a smaller BR in the same change, so balancing Q-5A only needs it remain at 9.0. Already with even no change the amount of uptiers Q-5A will face will increase, as well as it’s relative BR. Q-5A has nothing against higher BR vehicles, due to its limited top speed and subpar maneuverability at majority of speed range.