Again, non-german ground is nerfed
Id also say the T-80UD could be moved to 10.7/11.0 and given 3BM46. Currently it is rather formidable but equally not fun to play, it also kinda makes turms redundant if the players already researched Russia and has enough crew XP(such as grinding with 2S38). With other machines that should also get moved up such as obj 292 at 10.7, it should be able to make a rather unpopular BR in high tier USSR/Russia somewhat unique to play.
YES!
Or even just giving them a temporary ability that does that. It would make scouting a lot more valuable, and give LTs a big use. Though, it might cause issues at lower tiers, so more things would need scouting. (And some viecles would not get the LT’s low visibility, especially at low tier.)
(pls give it to pakpuma this totally not biased)
Guys make sure you like any suggestion you like, they will adjust the ones with the most likes.
I agree with you but just comparing it to the bulldog. Is it .3 better? Yeah. Is it .7 better? Without HEATFS hell nah
1 Like
One thing that needs to be done is an increase in AI gunner effectiveness and range, especially in RB.
2 Likes
Russia 10.0 line up is completely broke and need adjustments. Can we all agree.
10 Likes
2s38 is fine its the T-80UD and the 292 that need to move up
Helena is probably the single best CL in the game, moving it down would be criminal
2 Likes
It may be the problem of the sloppy and inconsistent target acquisition in air battles as a whole, but indeed.
Shh, dont tell him I oneshot a maus with ZT3A2 on mozdok hulldown, he cant even see me because im hiding behind the hill at F7 and its foggy where I got (GEN 2 btw) thermals
But thats more like any heavies in an uptier so this doesnt say much, the maus is fine at 7.7
1 Like
Frontal armour and stab mostly just matter in frontal engagements. for almost everything else, the much better mobility of the T-34 matters more. And the 3.7 M4s armour is nothing to write home about either.
.50 cal sure is nice, but how many people actually use it well at that BR…
I kinda take statistics over subjective opinions and comparing stats in a vacuum, ngl
Lmao yeah my bad, I meant hopefully Gaijin just leaves the Puma where it is now.
Its in a fine spot, dont need to be moving it to 4.0 in the foreseeable future.
That thing called the royal navy between 5.0 and 6.0:
Keeping it against Battleship spam is criminal
CL/CA should fight eachother, not be forced against hordes of BBs
Gaijin, please R2Y2’s down to 7.7 or 7.3; come on, they have no business being 8.0, especially after the gunnerf to 770 m/s. Hella Bad engines, good turn time, I also don’t see how the R2Y2’s are compareable to a MIG-15, a 1945 “Jet” vs a 1947 Jet
+Ki-200 also nerfed guns to 700 m/s and no more full HE belt.
+Hipper class should stay at 6.0.
1 Like
The vampire has the same problem with the zero, a zero player would be able to defeat many allies players cuz they began turnfighting, and many early jet players would turnfight a vampire too, since at the time(7.3/7.7) nobody has a significant energy advantage(except for the La-200 and some other stuff that nobody plays). They both got very good WR and KD and gets moved up subsequently.
1 Like
Stab is immensely helpful, and lets you fire first most of the time. Mobility advantage of the '34 is definite, but its balanced by the reload/armor disadvantage, especially in AB.
I dont play RB as much, but at least in AB its fine at 3.7.
Why would something need a hard counter? Do you wanna play Air Battles or Rock, Paper, Scissors? I’m not very knowledgable about Air balance, but as long as there are planes that can fight it on even or slightly advantaged terms, that should be more than fine