One thing that needs to be done is an increase in AI gunner effectiveness and range, especially in RB.
2 Likes
Russia 10.0 line up is completely broke and need adjustments. Can we all agree.
10 Likes
2s38 is fine its the T-80UD and the 292 that need to move up
Helena is probably the single best CL in the game, moving it down would be criminal
2 Likes
It may be the problem of the sloppy and inconsistent target acquisition in air battles as a whole, but indeed.
Shh, dont tell him I oneshot a maus with ZT3A2 on mozdok hulldown, he cant even see me because im hiding behind the hill at F7 and its foggy where I got (GEN 2 btw) thermals
But thats more like any heavies in an uptier so this doesnt say much, the maus is fine at 7.7
1 Like
Frontal armour and stab mostly just matter in frontal engagements. for almost everything else, the much better mobility of the T-34 matters more. And the 3.7 M4s armour is nothing to write home about either.
.50 cal sure is nice, but how many people actually use it well at that BR…
I kinda take statistics over subjective opinions and comparing stats in a vacuum, ngl
Lmao yeah my bad, I meant hopefully Gaijin just leaves the Puma where it is now.
Its in a fine spot, dont need to be moving it to 4.0 in the foreseeable future.
That thing called the royal navy between 5.0 and 6.0:
Keeping it against Battleship spam is criminal
CL/CA should fight eachother, not be forced against hordes of BBs
Gaijin, please R2Y2’s down to 7.7 or 7.3; come on, they have no business being 8.0, especially after the gunnerf to 770 m/s. Hella Bad engines, good turn time, I also don’t see how the R2Y2’s are compareable to a MIG-15, a 1945 “Jet” vs a 1947 Jet
+Ki-200 also nerfed guns to 700 m/s and no more full HE belt.
+Hipper class should stay at 6.0.
1 Like
The vampire has the same problem with the zero, a zero player would be able to defeat many allies players cuz they began turnfighting, and many early jet players would turnfight a vampire too, since at the time(7.3/7.7) nobody has a significant energy advantage(except for the La-200 and some other stuff that nobody plays). They both got very good WR and KD and gets moved up subsequently.
1 Like
Stab is immensely helpful, and lets you fire first most of the time. Mobility advantage of the '34 is definite, but its balanced by the reload/armor disadvantage, especially in AB.
I dont play RB as much, but at least in AB its fine at 3.7.
Why would something need a hard counter? Do you wanna play Air Battles or Rock, Paper, Scissors? I’m not very knowledgable about Air balance, but as long as there are planes that can fight it on even or slightly advantaged terms, that should be more than fine
This change should work on the T-80UD, but im not really sure about it. Let’s compare rougly that stated buff to the 90A.
90A will have a better dart, has LWS/LR. Because of this means that the 90A should be 11.0 aswell ?
6.0 being the new 5.7 when are you going to raise ground BR to 12.7 so you can unjam 8.0-10.0 and raise 7.0 to 7.7 so we can see an actual early Cold War BR?
2 Likes
Always.
I dont like this change overall, but compared to the other CAS option at 10.7, that being the Su-22M3 and F-104G, nah, id keep the AMX. Stock R-60Ms cant mean much in GRB anyways.
Both use limited APDS belts while the DCA has the universal belt. What lineup did you even want to play at 8.3 with the Brenus at 8.7 now? There’s little change with this choice.