CM11 ammunition loading speed data is provided by WT data personnel in Taiwan, China, China, who are CM11 loaders
1 Like
the APDS is still bad against 6.7
its ultra bad against 8.0 super heavies while being worse compared to german M41 that are resistant to 12.7mm frontally and from the top
Fox and M551 (76) doesnt need its BR raised
M551 (76) APDS is already generating random damage when penetrating, moving it to fight 8.0 Heavies and MBT are already worse considering it doesnt have HEATFS and not enough ammunition stowage for 4 shot to kill APDS
Fox is much worse than the Warrior, how is it going to sit near Warrior’s BR without Thermal and ATGM?
Funny you are saying that because M18 is more survivable and faster than the M551, making it a better tank than the M551 76 with its very reliable APHE which M551 76 APDS being unreliable.
Both dont deserve to go up simply because planes with caliber higher than 7mm easily kills them and 50 caliber machinegun kills them frontally
actually yeah, the Su-11 needs to go to at least 8.0 like, right now.
its not even a joke anymore.
3 Likes
Since IJN Mutsu has come into this game ,I believe the maxium of Naval BR should rise to 7.3,.Also , planes’ BR in naval battle should be independent with which in Realistic air battles
1 Like
Some personal suggestions (all for RB mode):
- The black cat and m64 should remain at 5.7 since they aren’t benefited from the recent engine hp buff. Especially the black cat as it would be total inferior compared to other hellcats when at the same br.
- If the BMP1s are going to 8.0 then the Swedish pbv501 should also go to 7.0 at least. The BMP’s missile controllability is rather bad at close ranges so I don’t believe it could make a 1.3 br difference.
- The me262A1 (and jabo) should be lowered to 6.7 if the F86 and mig15 is going to 8.0. It’s currently inferior at its br and if the new br is implemented conditions will only get much worse for it. Similarly, other me262s should all have their brs lowered by 0.3
- Similar to 3. Apart from the f86 and mig15, early German, British, Japanese, French and Swedish jets should all have their br reconsidered as the br is rather cramped for early jets, and every br change will make a significant change for the environment.
- The Swedish Sherman (Sherman 3/4) should go to 4.0. Its armor is identical to 4.0 shermans and has a better engine than it’s American counterpart, only without a .50cal. The missing .50cal does make some problems but I don’t think it’s enough to make it 's br 0.3 lower.
3 Likes
While it is identical to the F-25 Sabre in the game but, the MiG-15bis is actually much better if you know how to use it. It turns faster at mid to low speed and doesn’t have huge flight model issues just like Scimitar’s rudder.
And rudder compression and slower rolls are not really a problem, it can be solved simply by using air brakes and rudders. Even if it were to engage in a dogfight with an F-25 Sabre from high speed, the MiG-15bis would win 100% of the time.
The only problem is the learning curve is steep compared to other 8.7 machines just like you don’t know how to use it.
2 Likes
Hi,
Most of the ground changes are sensible and I can agree with. Undertiered premiums are being left out (2s38, VIDAR, SAV, KV-1B/E for example) either because of a financial incentive or poor player statistics. The changes that are here I agree with though.
Moving the Sabres and mig 15s down simply shifts the compression downwards, where early jets and spitfires will get absolutely destroyed by sabres/migs/related jets.
The BRs will need to be substantially decompressed to make these jet interactions fun and fair, which is the whole point of adjusting BRs in the first place. Changing the OP plane to be a different one does not solve the problem.
Thanks
1 Like
do you still think the Tiger H1 belongs at 4.7?
Shilka yenisei
Pz 4 belongs at 4.7
Shilka isnt bad but yeah the yenisei is horrible
Bruh what, 2s38 is broken af, it can go to 10.7 and be fine XD
Shilka is horrible even after radar changes the lock still jumps around the target making it literally impossible to aim
I think Yak-28B (The bomber) could go to a lower br of 9.0 because at 9.3 its nothing special,
It has problems with fuel, when you go just slightly down or experience negative Gs it INSTANTLY
suffers from fuel starvation, like it has the biggest problem with fuel ive ever experienced in an aircraft.
Also at 9.3 almost everything can outrun it, kill with missile and most deffinelty outturn it (its a bomber duh) And its bomb-load is kinda horrible for a bomber, its really bad for its BR, it needs some improvement or get to a lower BR.
Thanks for reading
1 Like
will the R-60MKs be added to the italian Su-22M3 or just the russian one?
4 Likes
Why are you using the radar lol its not nessecary unlike the yenisei you have a wall of 23mm
because an accurate burst uses less ammo than a wall of bullets
Bonjour, I think that some of the russian planes are to Low after the Changes, Like Mig 15 / 17.
Also I think that the Harrier GR.1 should get flares or move down from 9.7 to 9.3. Yes there was one GR.1 with a flare-system. Also i think the Tornado IDS variants may need a rework or a br change to 10.7.
1 Like