If you trade shots, mostly you are getting a hit into the turret. Tiger 2 turret is weak, really weak and results in instant dead because of the ammo carried there.
It’s also sluggish, and pretty big. Cannon is great - correct. Should the BR be lowered? I’m not so sure, early version maybe. But BR increase is out of option in the current state.
Gaijin really need to stop neglectinmg props, its so incredibly compressed and the balancing method of #of cannons > Flight performance is actually insane and stupid
Vehicle: Ta152c3
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 6.3 —> 5.3
Reason: God forgotten plane with unreasonably bad performance, cannot possibly be at 6.3. if not 5.3, at least 5.7.
4 Likes
It’s fine, I’m definitly in the minority there.
It going up to 5.0 means it doesn’t fit in my current line-ups anymore and I really don’t think it needs APHE
valid
just fan service for crying people, why you dont increase the br of the Yak3P? because you give a **** as devs the equilibrium, You must stop touching the br once and for all beauce of noobs and your pretty protect veterans friends of the developers.
2 Likes
the problem is more with the Yak-3U and VK-107 lol, if you ever fought those things you’ll know how incredibly impossible it is to deal with them unless ur in like a H-5 mustang
Ground RB/AB
Merkava MK.4M
12.7 → 12.3 like other mk4s
or
12.7 → 12.7 but with actual fixed armor, spall-liners and fixed internal models who are hilariously wrong too (along other MK4s) and without 1 million antennas :)
it’s an incredibly sad tank right now after the new internal modeling that just gave it an outright immense nerf, while i agree it has great qualities, it’s the biggest MBT of top tier with practically poor armor that cannot defend itself against even 10.3s 3BM42, this tank lives alone by player skill and not getting hit at all
5 Likes
I agree with you, but I wanted to say that training aircraft should be more limited in my opinion in term of dogfight than actual fighters.
And A-4E entered service in 1965 in Vietnam and the production ended in 1979, and flew in the end of the 70’s, and the F-16 entered service in '78. so it’s not the same.
Both Pumas should go down a step, or please do fix the Spike’s performance
1 Like
You can change the sensitivity to make it lower :)
lol, delusional
1 Like
dats crazy no
When willz those change be applied ?
To see how much time I can still have fun at JPN 7.3
I cant without switching to relative controls which dont auto reset axis. And having to reset them manually is worse than ±100% sensivity
(in relation to Air RB)
Some of the changes are reasonable
Some are downright psychotic
You have my seal of approval
Moving the A-6E up to 11.0 in GRB is criminal. No amount of altitude will save it from getting smacked out of the sky by any of the free Pantsir-S1 spawns. No FnF, no anti-radiation missiles; having to spend an eternity side-climbing, 20+ seconds guiding the munitions in leads to a bad time. Not to mention the skippers get shot down half the time anyway.
4 Likes
You don’t need to, you can just lower the sensitivity, fiddle around with it for a bit and you’ll know what I mean
The aiming pip is literally hidden behind the tail of the plane because of the angled pylons. To use the CCIP normally, you are forced to configure a specific keybind just to maintain a permanent camera offset during the run. On top of that, you have to deal with massive horizontal parallax because the pylons are mounted wide apart - meaning you have to constantly track which wing is firing and compensate for the lateral offset. And you need to hit the rockets very accurately, since they have already been nerfed several times. Only direct hits are allowed because of weak splash. Absolutely zero skill required, right?
Furthermore, suggesting to “just roll” ignores the fact that the MiG-15 has a notoriously awful roll rate, especially when fully loaded. Trying to fine-tune your aim on a sluggish subsonic brick while doing camera gymnastics is a nightmare, not a skill check.
And let’s not forget the SPAA opposition. Even a standard gun-based SPAA like the Gepard at 8.0 poses a serious threat due to its excellent ballistics and great range, making low - altitude runs extremely punishing. Not to mention what happens when you face actual missile SPAA higher up.
IRL this jet hever had a CCIP, instead of raising It`s BR to 8.7 or higher, maybe better to delete CCIP and return It to 8.0?
1 Like
Vehicle:
Q-5L 10.3→10.0（Ground Realistic）
Reason: 10.3 with only 2 × GB-500 and 0 × AAM have no reason, especially compare with Jaguar GR.1A which has much better arms