Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Besides the 75MM sherman, moving down IS-2 from 6.3 to 6.0, Tiger 2 not H version and IS-2 1944 to 6.3 while you have tanks like the M26 Pershing stuck at 6.7 with mid armor and decent gun seems like unfair treatment since IS-2 1944 and Tiger 2 has better cannons with 200+ RHA pen and better protection than the Pershing. the IS-2s and Tiger 2 are just fine at the current BRs they are at or move M26 Pershing back to 6.3 like what makes M26 Pershing 6.7 and these both IS-2 1944 and Tiger 2 1-50 lower br than it?

1 Like

I have a proposal. Give ONE of the Phantoms AIM-9L and keep it at 12.0. The other ones can go down to 11.7 as the way it is

AIR SIMULATOR

Su-11 7.0 → 7.3

Direct upgrade to Su-9 (7.0) with much stronger engines (approx. 1.5x thrust, that’s a LOT). In Air Realistic it went up not so long ago, it should follow suit in Air Simulator as well.

a6m3 mod 22

4.3 → 4.0

zeros have bad flight performance for their brs and should be moved DOWN instead of up

1 Like

Su-27SM is NOT worth 14.3 and on par with F-15E 💀💀💀

1 Like

Edit: MB i looked at air, but its not even the strongest 8.7 ground. It also gets 1 popped all the time by 8.0 tanks

1 Like

I would agree with moving M26 down to 6.3.

3 Likes

oh boy, mig 25? (best 11.0 by far)
also if you move xs up aspide carriers and f 4e need to gu up as well

Vehicle: M60A3 TTS (USA)

Change: given M833

Reason: all other tanks of similar type and performance, including the Chinese M60A3 TTS at the same BR, have DM33 or DM63 ammunition. It should be noted that M833 compared to DM33 still falls short in performance, but this is still a better option than M774 and would bring the M60A3 TTS closer to parity with its counterparts.

4 Likes

same

it should already be 14.0 long time ago

Air realistic
J7D
10.7->11.0
Pl5 is a noticable upgrade over stuff like r60, being extremely fast and having large range. It also has internal flares so no pod for drag unlike the mig21mf/smt. At 11.0 it will be same rating as bis, bis having up to 6 missiles but j7d having 4 better ones, and somewhat less engine power.

4 Likes

Vehicle: XM8

Change: given M833

Reason: The light tank is a more advanced evolution of the CCVL which in game uses M833. It should have at least the same ammo as its earlier design, but in truth it would have been capable of firing M900 given that the XM8 was built in the 1990’s when M900 was also produced. I think giving it M833 is a more than fair addition to the tank.

1 Like

Nah, Su-27SM is just fine where it is. It has a terrible radar and basic R-77s over 77-1s.

1 Like

That wouldn’t make any sense because no. 74 Squadron’s F-4J(UK) entered service in 1984, when the AIM-9L was already the standard short-range air-to-air missile. On top of that, it’s the weakest British Phantom in the game, which only strengthens the case for giving it AIM-9Ls.

If both aircraft receive the AIM-9L, the F-4J(UK) still won’t outshine the FGR.2.

3 Likes

Aim7e2 and apside have such limited range you can generally see them being fired at you. And yes I also agree the mig 25 should go up.

With your logic gaijin should just move every Russian tank down in br to stomp everything else too. Notice how all of the vehicles you list are Russian? But type 90 must go up? Insane man, Russian mains can’t be pleased with much. Only one or two of the br recommendations I can maybe agree with.

1 Like

r 60ms are still all aspect. you can call them just worse than pl 5b.

Vehicle: AGS

Change: given M900

Reason: The AGS has had it’s BR increased significantly to the point where it now has to fight the most advanced and heavily armored tanks in the game. M833 is not adequate for these engagements where it often has to fight layers of composite reactive armors on top of composite armor with spall linings. I know historically the vehicle was not designed to fire M900, but for the sake of game balance it really needs it.

1 Like

i dont know, the fact that their titles have stronger language than equivalent for the a6e?

oh so gbu39s ARE useful…you know what i dont know any other details of what you are saying so im just not gonna comment. 0 clue what you are talking about now lol, a10c cant gain altitude to 5k meters in arb?

and he says 0.7 while you say 0.3?

nope its a perfectly average human response to get restless when the person you’re arguing with types at a snails pace, that issue is more specific to you it seems who also cant understand making responses this slow is terrible for letting your opponent have patience to understand you, especially when you type two times slower

uh, it looks like the su-24m is 11.3 because of the kh29ts not the mitl munitions that use the same racks… compared to the j22 with them at 10.7. skippers very hard to shoot down lol?

a single enemy plane comes, gg, oh right we’re talking where almost all games have no fighters intercepting cas aircraft, interesting. oh and skippers are very hard to shoot down apparently

(after climbing for 5 minutes) lmao, good on you if you have such an excess of free time willing to spend on war thunder. yeah i agree, the kosova is overrated, grom b isn’t.

oh my stand is: j22 at 11.0, a-6e at 10.7, too bad if you simply cant understand why. not gonna argue further with a guy with talks so slowly