Sea Vixen at 8.7: radar, RWR, Bullpups, IR-missiles.
German/Italian G.91 at 8.7: 4x AIM-9B or 4x AS-20 Nord.
MiG-15Bis ISh: A standard MiG-15 with a poor roll rate and awful ballistics. Yes, it has CCIP, but to use it effectively, you have to manually pitch down the camera every single time and return it back just to use your guns normally. If you actually played this plane, you would know how punishing the massive parallax effect is.
On top of that, at 8.7 it will face systems like the Ozelot, Gepard 1A2, Rapier, SIDAM 25, and Roland 1 - they will be more than happy to welcome a subsonic jet with open arms.
USSR attack aviation at 8.0-9.0 BRs is already practically dead, so hey, let’s finish it off completely, great idea!
P.S.: Oh, and speaking of balanced CCIP: L-39ZA is already sitting at 6.7 and terrorizing everything in sight, so why not
Ground RB
IA58 4.3-5.3/5.7
Excellent turning performance，many rockets can be used for CAS.
The IA58 can even easily fight many fighter aircrafts on 4.3 BR.
He was comparing the stats of the F-15C GE against the AESA eurofighters
And in air rb 16v16 scenarios, the F-15C GE has a massive advantage over the eurofigher due to the sheer missile count.
Vehicle: MirageF1C/CT/C200
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 —> 10.7
Reason: There is no fundamental difference between the Mirage F1C/CT/C200 and the Kfir C2—in fact, the former are arguably worse—so they should undergo the same adjustments.
again what you are saying is, players who use the rank 7 premiums to grind the air TT in ARB (incredible decision), are more likely to ground pound in the j-22 significantly more than the a-6e, and your evidence for that is? absolutely nothing. the evidence on the other side is rather overwhelming indicating the j-22’s overperformance compared to the a-6e, but I get that you just want to be contrarion for the sake of it.
first time I hear someone say tv mitl sight is worse than laser for bombs of comparable performance lmfao.
same for your countless other takes, mf really thinks the average player will care so much to play differently for a single plane. they care about kills, and the a-6e does not give that fast and as easily as other planes
Vehicle: XM8
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change 9.7 → 10.3
Rank Change VI → VII
Reason: Somehow the CCVL, wich was a “prototype” of the XM8 has acces to a better shell and sits at higher BR than later produced vehicle. This is absurd and I propose to give XM8 it’s historical ammo, M833 and M900.
Current BR : 6.7 propose —> 6.3 or fix the APDS issue
Resson : Tiger 2 P, Is-2 1944 are going 6.3
Tortoise
Current BR : 6.7 propose —> 6.3 OR ADD 32 pdr APDS / fix the commander turret armor
Reason : slow tank with huge weakspot and similar use with the T28 (6.3 with
Bette ammo/gun and front armor)
Churchill mk VII
Current BR : 4.7 —> 4.7
With APHE, the vehicule is competitive, but still slower than opponents T-14 and KV-1. If raising the BR of the Churchill, you need to fix decompression arrond 5.0-8.0
The Churchill can’t fight Panthers or IS-2 (downBR non sense). Keep it 4.7 and let SOME FUN for Britain. Stop bullying them.
Chieftain Mk.3 / Chieftain Mk.5
Current BR : 8.7 propose 8.3 — for MK.3 / ADD L15A5 APDS for Mk.5 to stay 8.7 — for MK5
Reason : Chieftain Mk5 is already at 8.7, the Mk3 is slower and 8.3 would help the vehicule. About the Mk.5 Adding L15A5 with good value apds would be a better
Competitive vehicule.
I don’t, I can watch corb’s videos on both of them and clearly see the difference, though i don’t think you do. I’m not that stupid to spend money on a vehicle I don’t need.
Loads of expected BR changes, but like move those 4.3 Russian tanks to 3rd rank already, come on.
Also M44 to 3.7? I mean, it is nice to see vacuum, after Chafee moved to 4.0, to be filled in, but the performance even for 4.3 is clearly there. It is easy mode whenever I played M44.
Charioteer to 6.0? Why? That’s one of the representatives of competition that T20 had at 6.3. Certainly felt like one of the meta vehicles at 6.3
M109A1 to 6.0 seems unnecessary too, it felt very comfortable at 6.3
Stug 3 coming to 3rd rank is welcome change, Sturer Emil would be nice to have there as well.
Not a fan that reload speed creep. Is it really necessary for improving gameplay?
the Chinese tree simply doesn’t deserve capable AA systems at the 9.0 area. Either completely get rid of the AHEAD rounds, or move them up to the same BR as the PUMA with spikes.
The Z19/Z19E should remain at 11.3; an increase in numbers cannot compensate for the AKD‑9’s performance shortcomings (its effective range is only 6 kilometers). The AKD‑9 is clearly inferior to the AGM‑114B/K (effective range of 8 kilometers). Helicopters equipped with AGM‑114B/K on the table have already been downgraded to 11.7–11.3. Given the performance of the TY‑90 and the Z‑9WA, the weight should not be reduced and thus remains at 11.3.
The ship should never had a BR reduction in the first place.
Good 5" mains, lots of 20mms, plenty of torpedos, good quantity of SAP and HE-VT. Good speed, decent manouverability. She is barely less effective than Gridley and Bagley and has advantages over every other current 3.7 DD each of which have at least one capability lacking (Eg T22 HETF only, Vega no torpedos, Optny only 3 main gums)