The Leopard 1A5 bringing DM33 to 9.0, Gaijin must add M833 to the M60A3 TTS.
2 Likes
Can’t respect how strong it is when the airframe can’t get into position to use it 9 times out of 10.
1 Like
Negative, 2 in italy, 3 in Britain
Vehicle: Mig 25 11.0-- 11.3 or 11.7
Reason: almost impossible to fight, also best 11.0 regards wn, k/d (40% better than second best in june) and k/s
4 Likes
Centurion MK. 2
Current BR : 6.7 propose —> 6.3 or fix the APDS issue
Resson : Tiger 2 P, Is-2 1944 are going 6.3
Tortoise
Current BR : 6.7 propose —> 6.3 OR ADD 32 pdr APDS / fix the commander turret armor
Reason : slow tank with huge weakspot and similar use with the T28 (6.3 with
Bette ammo/gun and front armor)
Churchill mk VII
Current BR : 4.7 —> 4.7
With APHE, the vehicule is competitive, but still slower than opponents T-14 and KV-1. If raising the BR of the Churchill, you need to fix decompression arrond 5.0-8.0
The Churchill can’t fight Panthers or IS-2 (downBR non sense). Keep it 4.7 and let SOME FUN for Britain. Stop bullying them.
Chieftain Mk.3 / Chieftain Mk.5
Current BR : 8.7 propose 8.3 — for MK.3 / ADD L15A5 APDS for Mk.5 to stay 8.7 — for MK5
Reason : Chieftain Mk5 is already at 8.7, the Mk3 is slower and 8.3 would help the vehicule. About the Mk.5 Adding L15A5 with good value apds would be a better
Competitive vehicule.
8 Likes
I don’t, I can watch corb’s videos on both of them and clearly see the difference, though i don’t think you do. I’m not that stupid to spend money on a vehicle I don’t need.
Loads of expected BR changes, but like move those 4.3 Russian tanks to 3rd rank already, come on.
Also M44 to 3.7? I mean, it is nice to see 3.7 BR vacuum filled in, after Chafee moved to 4.0, but the performance even for 4.3 is clearly there. It is easy mode whenever I played M44.
Charioteer to 6.0? Why? That’s one of the representatives of competition that T20 had at 6.3. Certainly felt like one of the meta vehicles at 6.3
M109A1 to 6.0 seems unnecessary too, it felt very comfortable at 6.3
Stug 3 coming to 3rd rank is welcome change, Sturer Emil would be nice to have there as well.
Not a fan of that reload speed creep. Is it really necessary for improving gameplay?
1 Like
Vehicle: Gripen A 13.0-12.7
Reason: low missile count, no good fox 1s or fox 3s, side grade to f 15a thats already 12.7
2 Likes
The Z19/Z19E should remain at 11.3; an increase in numbers cannot compensate for the AKD‑9’s performance shortcomings (its effective range is only 6 kilometers). The AKD‑9 is clearly inferior to the AGM‑114B/K (effective range of 8 kilometers). Helicopters equipped with AGM‑114B/K on the table have already been downgraded to 11.7–11.3. Given the performance of the TY‑90 and the Z‑9WA, the weight should not be reduced and thus remains at 11.3.
6 Likes
Suggestion:
USS Alwyn
3+7>4.0
The ship should never had a BR reduction in the first place.
Good 5" mains, lots of 20mms, plenty of torpedos, good quantity of SAP and HE-VT. Good speed, decent manouverability. She is barely less effective than Gridley and Bagley and has advantages over every other current 3.7 DD each of which have at least one capability lacking (Eg T22 HETF only, Vega no torpedos, Optny only 3 main gums)
2 Likes
vehicle: F-14A Early
change: add AIM-9M
reason: same BR as F-15J with AAM-3
Mode: RB
Vehicle: Leopard A1A1 (L/44)
Change:
BR 9.3 → 9.7
Add DM33
There is no reason to play this tank currently. With the 1A5 going to 9.0 even less so. It has worse armor than the Leopard 1a5 and less penetration.
Therefore it should receive a better shell and move up in BR to provide a slightly different playstyle.
1 Like
hellnahhhhhh Its fine at 11.0.
F-15J shouldn’t be 12.7
terrible justification
1 Like
F-15A shouldn’t be 12.7 anyways
2 Likes
When T-62 to 8.3? It’s similar to the T-55 armor wise. But has worse ammo selection, no roof hmg and a slightly longer reload speed. Only upsides are slightly better penning dart, higher velocity and faster vertical traverse speed.
Also, how come the Leo 1a1a will be at the same br as the T-62??
1 Like
and su 27 and 33 shouldnt be 13.0. but here we are…
TY-90 is now the only IR missile in game that does not have 1 sec seeker warm-up time. Can we change it to match the stand?
1 Like
Vehicle: MiG-29SMT 9.19
Gamemode: Ground battles (All)
Changes: Decrease BR 12.3 —> 12.0
Reason: Currently it’s CAS load out is subpar compared to its counterparts at 12.3 since it only has access to 2x Kh-29TDs as AGM or 4x KAB-500Kr or KAB-500S
1 Like
Oops, meant specifically the Tech Tree