Yet there still in game and you can still fight against them I’ve literally fought against e100 back to back in games before
its funny using that argument when people ask for 6.0 262s
I support you! F/A18c(early) can move to 12.0, then blind TV seekers(kh29td) should also be in 12.0, including su30mk2 and mig29m.
The fact that none of these changes will affect sim still baffles me…
the lf mk 9 and ki 84 variants are still 5.0 in sim, and the j2m2 is 3.7, allied aircraft have no answer for it at 3.7
Plus the yak 3u still being 6.0 despite being literally the best prop in the game, and out performing a 51h in literally every metric aside from dive and top speed just goes to show that gaijin will go an extra mile to give russia a little advantage, and if you think im crazy, check it out; aircraft with engines like the vk 105, 107 and shvetsov m82 dont lose performance above 5km like they did in real life
Check out the engine performances, literally the only aircraft that can beat a yak3u at high alt is a dora 12 and a fw 190c variant, other than that, unlike in real life, these aircraft will outperforme you even in high alts…
Air RB
F-111A
10.7 → 10.0
OR Add AIM-9J
Currently the F-111A is extremely sad in air RB
It has its legacy BR of 10.7 from when it was very good in flight performance,
since the major flight performance nerf, this aircraft is near enough useless, it has Extreme speed bleed, extremely low acceleration, extremely hot engines and only AIM-9Bs
It either needs a major BR reduction, or AIM-9J to at least remain useable at 10,7
9 Likes
What?
Mode: Air Simulator
Aircraft: Mirage 2000C-S4
Change: 12.3->12.0
Reasoning: The generally low missile count of 2 Radar missiles and 2 IR guided ones combined with the 16 Flares and 18 Chaff make this plane extremely difficult to play as at 12.3 you only see uptiers to at least 12.7 and when going up against ARH slingers (F-14A, F-14A IRIAF) the dumping of chaff to fool the missiles is impossible as you would run out of chaff before leaving the square of the Airfield. At 12.0 the plane would still face the Tomcats in certain brackets but they are not included in the “best case scenario” brackets.
1 Like
Speaking of proofs and assumptions, do you own a6e?
S-38b 1.7->1.3
It has also 0 difference besides 2 extra MG-34s and slightly more armor. Not good enough to go from reserve to 1.7!
1 Like
su-39 at 11.7 br? please give me my money back, i dont want it anymore.
also yak-141 still useless at 11.7.
1 Like
Morvan did not propose proper decompression, he proposed that the EFT AESA and F15CGE are equals
Sea Vixen at 8.7: radar, RWR, Bullpups, IR-missiles.
German/Italian G.91 at 8.7: 4x AIM-9B or 4x AS-20 Nord.
MiG-15Bis ISh: A standard MiG-15 with a poor roll rate and awful ballistics. Yes, it has CCIP, but to use it effectively, you have to manually pitch down the camera every single time and return it back just to use your guns normally. If you actually played this plane, you would know how punishing the massive parallax effect is.
On top of that, at 8.7 it will face systems like the Ozelot, Gepard 1A2, Rapier, SIDAM 25, and Roland 1 - they will be more than happy to welcome a subsonic jet with open arms.
USSR attack aviation at 8.0-9.0 BRs is already practically dead, so hey, let’s finish it off completely, great idea!
P.S.: Oh, and speaking of balanced CCIP: L-39ZA is already sitting at 6.7 and terrorizing everything in sight, so why not
I was expecting those british tanks to get moved up after being given APHE.
Ground RB
IA58 4.3-5.3/5.7
Excellent turning performance，many rockets can be used for CAS.
The IA58 can even easily fight many fighter aircrafts on 4.3 BR.
5 Likes
2k and 11k vs 618k battles. Do you see the difference?
He was comparing the stats of the F-15C GE against the AESA eurofighters
And in air rb 16v16 scenarios, the F-15C GE has a massive advantage over the eurofigher due to the sheer missile count.
it is definitely 14.7 material
2 Likes
Vehicle: MirageF1C/CT/C200
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 —> 10.7
Reason: There is no fundamental difference between the Mirage F1C/CT/C200 and the Kfir C2—in fact, the former are arguably worse—so they should undergo the same adjustments.
Vehicle: yak 3U, vk; 5.7- 6.3
Reason: should not be equal or lower br than zeros that are getting moved up
6 Likes
again what you are saying is, players who use the rank 7 premiums to grind the air TT in ARB (incredible decision), are more likely to ground pound in the j-22 significantly more than the a-6e, and your evidence for that is? absolutely nothing. the evidence on the other side is rather overwhelming indicating the j-22’s overperformance compared to the a-6e, but I get that you just want to be contrarion for the sake of it.
first time I hear someone say tv mitl sight is worse than laser for bombs of comparable performance lmfao.
same for your countless other takes, mf really thinks the average player will care so much to play differently for a single plane. they care about kills, and the a-6e does not give that fast and as easily as other planes
Vehicle: XM8
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change 9.7 → 10.3
Rank Change VI → VII
Reason: Somehow the CCVL, wich was a “prototype” of the XM8 has acces to a better shell and sits at higher BR than later produced vehicle. This is absurd and I propose to give XM8 it’s historical ammo, M833 and M900.
6 Likes